ADVERTISEMENT

A breakdown on UNC

Cougsocal

Hall Of Fame
Sep 5, 2010
2,963
1,155
113
We are playing a team coached by the "John Wooden" of college soccer. UNC has won 21 NCAA titles. Their roster reflects that. Their team is littered with players who have been called up to U17, U20, and the National Team, here or in England. After, watching the USC game in full, they have better ball skills than we do, play the ball with more pace, they have a high work rate and are aggressive. They have great depth, allowing their first team (less defenders) to play only 60 minutes with little drop off.

That said, they have won only 1 title in the last ten years. You wonder why? For all their talent, they play from the "how to" play soccer text book, with little flare or imagination. They are a team you can prepare for defensively.

They are aggressive offensively, pushing numbers forward, and their defenders play a very high line. They try to make it very difficult for you to play (dribble) out of your own end. But because of their aggression they don't make it difficult for you to possess the ball. They don't play Tiki Taka, i.e. keep away.

What does this mean for the Cougs? Assuming they play this same style against us (Remember, South Carolina chose to play with numbers back against us, afraid of our pace), we will be under assault, defensively. This won't be South Carolina, where they had only 1 solid shot on goal all game, in OT. We will need to defend in numbers, and resist the temptation to foul in or around the box. The ref could easily have awarded a penalty kick to South Carolina on a play that wasn't even remotely “do or die.” UNC is the blue blood, they will get that call. We need to trust that Dederick will make the stop on breakdowns.

Based on what I saw, Emily Fox, their best and most dynamic player, will miss our game due to injury (she was carried off the field with a leg injury).

UNC is ripe to be countered with our pace -- if they play their game. I have to believe that sheer hubris will not allow their coach to fundamentally change how they play, to a more defensive style, against the upstart Cougars. Because their defenders play so high, there will be plenty of space behind them to play the ball. Their goalie tries to neutralize this by coming up field to cover these balls. But this can be countered by playing the ball into the channels to the left or right of the goal mouth. Goalies are far more reticent to go after these balls because the goal becomes completely exposed.

USC was able to counter these guy with Penelope Hocking, wearing a full knee brace. So while the UNC defenders are clearly a cut above the South Carolina defenders, pace wise, they don’t have elite pace. To get the ball on the feet of Bennett and Weaver, we need to win the ball, pass quickly to Collins or Gomera-Stevens, centrally, who should turn and immediately deliver the ball into space allowing Bennett and Weaver the opportunity to run onto the ball. We need to resist the urge to try to dribble the ball into the mid field. We will get dispossessed quickly, and they will continue to attack without concern or pressure on their defense. Their defenders were not rested during the USC game, assuming that is the plan against us, also, their pace should fade down the stretch, if we make them work early, and often.
 
Last edited:
We are playing a team coached by the "John Wooden" of college soccer. UNC has won 21 NCAA titles. Their roster reflects that. Their team is littered with players who have been called up to U17, U20, and the National Team, here or in England. After, watching the USC game in full, they have better ball skills than we do, play the ball with more pace, they have a high work rate and are aggressive. They have great depth, allowing their first team (less defenders) to play only 60 minutes with little drop off.

That said, they have won only 1 title in the last ten years. You wonder why? For all their talent, they play from the "how to" play soccer text book, with little flare or imagination. They are a team you can prepare for defensively.

They are aggressive offensively, pushing numbers forward, and their defenders play a very high line. They try to make it very difficult for you to play (dribble) out of your own end. But because of their aggression they don't make it difficult for you to possess the ball. They don't play Tiki Taka, i.e. keep away.

What does this mean for the Cougs? Assuming they play this same style against us (Remember, South Carolina chose to play with numbers back against us, afraid of our pace), we will be under assault, defensively. This won't be South Carolina, where they had only 1 solid shot on goal all game, in OT. We will need to defend in numbers, and resist the temptation to foul in or around the box. The ref could easily have awarded a penalty kick to South Carolina on a play that wasn't even remotely “do or die.” UNC is the blue blood, they will get that call. We need to trust that Dederick will make the stop on breakdowns.

Based on what I saw, Emily Fox, their best and most dynamic player, will miss our game due to injury (she was carried off the field with a leg injury).

UNC is ripe to be countered with our pace -- if they play their game. I have to believe that sheer hubris will not allow their coach to fundamentally change how they play, to a more defensive style, against the upstart Cougars. Because their defenders play so high, there will be plenty of space behind them to play the ball. Their goalie tries to neutralize this by coming up field to cover these balls. But this can be countered by playing the ball into the channels to the left or right of the goal mouth. Goalies are far more reticent to go after these balls because the goal becomes completely exposed.

USC was able to counter these guy with Penelope Hocking, wearing a full knee brace. So while the UNC defenders are clearly a cut above the South Carolina defenders, pace wise, they don’t have elite pace. To get the ball on the feet of Bennett and Weaver, we need to win the ball, pass quickly to Collins or Gomera-Stevens, centrally, who should turn and immediately deliver the ball into space allowing Bennett and Weaver the opportunity to run onto the ball. We need to resist the urge to try to dribble the ball into the mid field. We will get dispossessed quickly, and they will continue to attack without concern or pressure on their defense. Their defenders were not rested during the USC game, assuming that is the plan against us, also, their pace should fade down the stretch, if we make them work early, and often.

Thanks for this, socal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cougzz
Awesome, thanks. I just read more about soccer than I ever have before or ever will again. Pulling for the Cougs to win this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cougzz
Over the weekend, I watched the replay of our win over #1 UVa. Believe it or not, we could easily have won 6-2. Collins and Pulver flubbed open point blank shots and a Weaver take down in the box should have been a penalty. South Carolina’s defensive shell, try to steal a goal, strategy, now seems more reasonable. Also, I’m no longer so sure that UNC will try to play us straight up, strength vs strength.
 
We are playing a team coached by the "John Wooden" of college soccer. UNC has won 21 NCAA titles. Their roster reflects that. Their team is littered with players who have been called up to U17, U20, and the National Team, here or in England. After, watching the USC game in full, they have better ball skills than we do, play the ball with more pace, they have a high work rate and are aggressive. They have great depth, allowing their first team (less defenders) to play only 60 minutes with little drop off.

That said, they have won only 1 title in the last ten years. You wonder why? For all their talent, they play from the "how to" play soccer text book, with little flare or imagination. They are a team you can prepare for defensively.

They are aggressive offensively, pushing numbers forward, and their defenders play a very high line. They try to make it very difficult for you to play (dribble) out of your own end. But because of their aggression they don't make it difficult for you to possess the ball. They don't play Tiki Taka, i.e. keep away.

What does this mean for the Cougs? Assuming they play this same style against us (Remember, South Carolina chose to play with numbers back against us, afraid of our pace), we will be under assault, defensively. This won't be South Carolina, where they had only 1 solid shot on goal all game, in OT. We will need to defend in numbers, and resist the temptation to foul in or around the box. The ref could easily have awarded a penalty kick to South Carolina on a play that wasn't even remotely “do or die.” UNC is the blue blood, they will get that call. We need to trust that Dederick will make the stop on breakdowns.

Based on what I saw, Emily Fox, their best and most dynamic player, will miss our game due to injury (she was carried off the field with a leg injury).

UNC is ripe to be countered with our pace -- if they play their game. I have to believe that sheer hubris will not allow their coach to fundamentally change how they play, to a more defensive style, against the upstart Cougars. Because their defenders play so high, there will be plenty of space behind them to play the ball. Their goalie tries to neutralize this by coming up field to cover these balls. But this can be countered by playing the ball into the channels to the left or right of the goal mouth. Goalies are far more reticent to go after these balls because the goal becomes completely exposed.

USC was able to counter these guy with Penelope Hocking, wearing a full knee brace. So while the UNC defenders are clearly a cut above the South Carolina defenders, pace wise, they don’t have elite pace. To get the ball on the feet of Bennett and Weaver, we need to win the ball, pass quickly to Collins or Gomera-Stevens, centrally, who should turn and immediately deliver the ball into space allowing Bennett and Weaver the opportunity to run onto the ball. We need to resist the urge to try to dribble the ball into the mid field. We will get dispossessed quickly, and they will continue to attack without concern or pressure on their defense. Their defenders were not rested during the USC game, assuming that is the plan against us, also, their pace should fade down the stretch, if we make them work early, and often.

One of the U 17 players led our Wesco high school school to a state championship the year she was allowed to play high school ball. NC is very talented.
 
One of the U 17 players led our Wesco high school school to a state championship the year she was allowed to play high school ball. NC is very talented.

You're telling me that the most successful women’s college soccer team ever is very talented? And here i thought they lucked their way into this game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taf88
I think Ed is referring to Madison Schultz. She is a sub forward. They say she played for Edmond Woodway. According to her coach, on there Website, she has the skills to start, but lacks the fitness. It mirrored what saw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wazzucougs96
I think Ed is referring to Madison Schultz. She is a sub forward. They say she played for Edmond Woodway. According to her coach, on there Website, she has the skills to start, but lacks the fitness. It mirrored what saw.

Fastest kid I ever saw on a soccer field. She has the talent to start, and I think she scored the winning goal against the UW when they played earlier this year. Not sure the coach is off om her remarks.
 
Fastest kid I ever saw on a soccer field. She has the talent to start, and I think she scored the winning goal against the UW when they played earlier this year. Not sure the coach is off om her remarks.

Have you seen Weaver? Her speed is US National Team fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kougkurt
Have you seen Weaver? Her speed is US National Team fast.

So is Maddy.... but let me be a little more precise for you . Fastest kid I PERSONALLY saw on the soccer field
 
Last edited:
Fastest kid I ever saw on a soccer field. She has the talent to start, and I think she scored the winning goal against the UW when they played earlier this year. Not sure the coach is off om her remarks.

Virtually everyone who gets an ACC or Pac-12 soccer scholie is a youth star. College is just at another level. There's a ton of kids who are agile, fast and elusive for 15 minutes, but you need players with the gas tank to play that way for 90. Hell it isn't that difficult to stop Messi for 15 minutes, its the last 75 that the bitch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taf88
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT