The fire chief is obviously a leftist who loves teslas but hates Elon. He probably shits in a litter box too.Wow. I got this now: the Fire Chief didn’t know about the reservoir being offline because she’s an incompetent DEI hire that George Soros undoubtedly backed. Then Soros fired his space lasers knowing full well there would be no water so he could burn down the city, force everyone to evacuate allowing the United Nations to move in to seize all of the property and turn LA into an AI controlled “Smart City”. This makes perfect sense.
Oh, it’s so much worse than you can imagine - they are a w-o-m-a-n. And a l-e-s-b-i-a-n. I’ll bet you she even believes in human caused climate change because she’s dumb enough to believe scientists and too stupid and lazy to do her own research.The fire chief is obviously a leftist who loves teslas but hates Elon. He probably shits in a litter box too.
I’m sure that if LA had tried to design and build a system that had capacity to provide water to fight fires driven by 80 MPH winds, then Woods, Rogan, and Trump would have criticized them for wasting money.Here’s a video from the WSJ that does a decent job explaining the water situation in LA, complete with clips from assholes like James Woods, Joe Rogan and the future Crap-for-Brains In Chief making shit up and politicizing and exploiting a massive tragedy.
I’m sure that if LA had tried to design and build a system that had capacity to provide water to fight fires driven by 80 MPH winds, then Woods, Rogan, and Trump would have criticized them for wasting money.
Simple reality: when people insist on building on hillsides covered by dense vegetation, those structures are going to be at risk whenever wind and fire intersect. No amount of planning can put enough water at the top of a hill to effectively combat fires like this.
Good article. And yeah I'd like to know how your in-laws in-laws emerged unscathed. In some of these before and after pictures you see a house or building standing surrounded by devastation. And the comment on "random ignitions" in Altadena some distance from the major fireline - I see/saw that in some of the aerial pics as well. Did they have shake roofs or what?Inconvenient truths about the fires burning in Los Angeles from two fire experts
For years, renowned fire experts Jack Cohen and Stephen Pyne have tried to shift the conversation on fire prevention strategies. This week’s destruction, they say, could have been minimized.www.latimes.com
Here’s an interesting article from the LA Times. The perspective here is that people focus too much on the wildland-urban interface when they should instead be focused on “home-hardening” as most of the destruction in large urban fires is spread by embers carried by winds rather than big flames. That may sound silly when watching video of huge walls of fire consuming trees while spreading through the canyons in LA but as far as the mass destruction of high density housing huge walls of flame from burning vegation isn’t the primary vector. One of the experts interviewed pointed out that you will see trees that have survived right next to burned out homes - embers from neighbors burning houses were carried over to other houses through the air rather than having the adjacent trees transmitting the fire from one house to another.
My sister-in-law’s brother-in-law owns a Malibu waterfront house that was spared while every other house around it burned down. I personally don’t know him but I’d love to find out how his house was constructed and whether that helped to spare his home - I suspect his house was “fire-hardened” but then again maybe it was just an incredible fluke that it survived.
I'm sure that a bunch of places did have shake roofs. I also suspect that in some of the hillsides and beachfront locations there was a fair number of flat roof buildings in order to maximize house volume within existing Building/Planning Code restrictions. And so how do they seal those places? Hot mopped petroleum goo products. Yeah, that stuff would never burn!Good article. And yeah I'd like to know how your in-laws in-laws emerged unscathed. In some of these before and after pictures you see a house or building standing surrounded by devastation. And the comment on "random ignitions" in Altadena some distance from the major fireline - I see/saw that in some of the aerial pics as well. Did they have shake roofs or what?
And edit - being that I've been to SoCal once in my adult lifetime (around Jan 1, 1998), and never to the Palisades/Malibu area, I did not realize that the "mountains" really are right there. And the Palisades fire appears to have indeed started in the woods/mountains. FWIW.
Duh. I just found out that his house has been in the news - he was interviewed and said it has a fireproof roof ( but nothing specific) and stucco siding. It was primarily built to be earthquake proof and to withstand pounding from the ocean waves.Good article. And yeah I'd like to know how your in-laws in-laws emerged unscathed. In some of these before and after pictures you see a house or building standing surrounded by devastation. And the comment on "random ignitions" in Altadena some distance from the major fireline - I see/saw that in some of the aerial pics as well. Did they have shake roofs or what?
Petroleum goo? I just flashed back to the old Traffic song.......I'm sure that a bunch of places did have shake roofs. I also suspect that in some of the hillsides and beachfront locations there was a fair number of flat roof buildings in order to maximize house volume within existing Building/Planning Code restrictions. And so how do they seal those places? Hot mopped petroleum goo products. Yeah, that stuff would never burn!