Now that the class is full and probably has its final rating of 29th, 3rd in Pac 12.
I would like to cover what is usually not included in the class rankings.
Fit, Filling holes, Letter Grade, Upside, Potential, etc.
To illustrate this importance there have been some amazing pro sports drafts, and recruiting classes, by team that altho were the highest rated, still got the lesser class, draft, letter grade.
For example a team might recruit or draft the Best QB in 65 years, and have the highest rated class, but have a F for letter grade, because they have 4 Pro Bowl QB's in front of that recruit, draftee.
Altho this class is 29th, 3rd in Pac 12, I think that it should be 15th, 2nd in Pac 12.
Here Why:
Fit, filling holes, Basketball IQ, Upside, Potential, Intangibles, etc, wise, this class is one of the best in the country.
Without that, the class would be 29th, 3rd. But with that, the class should be ranked higher.
Fit: All of these kids in the class, seem to be a good fit for both the kid, WSU.
Filling Holes: Every Need was addressed, filled, even PG, altho its questionable at PG, because of combo, semi PG, not a PURE pg.
Basketball IQ: These kids are smart on the court.
Upside, Potential: The only Pac 12 class IMO that has more, is Arizona.
Intangibles:
Teachable, Humble, Work Hard, Hate to lose, competitive, etc.
The only Pac 12 class IMO that has more is Arizona.
All of these things combined, is why WSU gets the 2nd best Letter Grade in the Pac 12, IMO, and gets a A+ Letter Grade, IMO, and why IMO this class should be rated about 15th in country, + or - about 3 spots, give or take, and 2nd in Pac 12, behind Arizona(Arizona still gets 1st, as their class is more amazing. I think Stanford is just barely slightly overrated, and not as good as WSU's class.)
Also in WSU's history, there have been some amazing clssses, but almost none of them have the Fit, Filling Holes, Basketball IQ, Upside, Potential, Intangibles, etc, as this class, and usually either had good guards, 1 good big man, or good bigs, 1 good guard, and not good
bigs, wings, guards, etc, like this class.
Now no one credible is saying that. This is just my opinion. But I do think my opinion is logical.
I would like to cover what is usually not included in the class rankings.
Fit, Filling holes, Letter Grade, Upside, Potential, etc.
To illustrate this importance there have been some amazing pro sports drafts, and recruiting classes, by team that altho were the highest rated, still got the lesser class, draft, letter grade.
For example a team might recruit or draft the Best QB in 65 years, and have the highest rated class, but have a F for letter grade, because they have 4 Pro Bowl QB's in front of that recruit, draftee.
Altho this class is 29th, 3rd in Pac 12, I think that it should be 15th, 2nd in Pac 12.
Here Why:
Fit, filling holes, Basketball IQ, Upside, Potential, Intangibles, etc, wise, this class is one of the best in the country.
Without that, the class would be 29th, 3rd. But with that, the class should be ranked higher.
Fit: All of these kids in the class, seem to be a good fit for both the kid, WSU.
Filling Holes: Every Need was addressed, filled, even PG, altho its questionable at PG, because of combo, semi PG, not a PURE pg.
Basketball IQ: These kids are smart on the court.
Upside, Potential: The only Pac 12 class IMO that has more, is Arizona.
Intangibles:
Teachable, Humble, Work Hard, Hate to lose, competitive, etc.
The only Pac 12 class IMO that has more is Arizona.
All of these things combined, is why WSU gets the 2nd best Letter Grade in the Pac 12, IMO, and gets a A+ Letter Grade, IMO, and why IMO this class should be rated about 15th in country, + or - about 3 spots, give or take, and 2nd in Pac 12, behind Arizona(Arizona still gets 1st, as their class is more amazing. I think Stanford is just barely slightly overrated, and not as good as WSU's class.)
Also in WSU's history, there have been some amazing clssses, but almost none of them have the Fit, Filling Holes, Basketball IQ, Upside, Potential, Intangibles, etc, as this class, and usually either had good guards, 1 good big man, or good bigs, 1 good guard, and not good
bigs, wings, guards, etc, like this class.
Now no one credible is saying that. This is just my opinion. But I do think my opinion is logical.
