Fork in the road

[UberCougars]

46 million views in one day.

Without an editor.

Agree or disagree, it’s unprecedented in history.

This is news. More news than all other news sources, combined.

For those of you choosing to continue to hide your heads in the sand, maybe it’s time to consider change?

There’s a reason why X continues to be the world’s #1 NEWS download.

 

[Coug90]

You’re such a dumbass.

 

[UberCougars]

100,000,000 people discussing something broadcast less than 24 hours ago.

Not big like your flying Bigfoot’s I will grant you but, it’s still kind of a big deal.

 

[UberCougars]

Didn’t see this one on CNN either, Lemu Emu.

 

[longtimecoug]

View embedded media

Didn’t see this one on CNN either, Lemu Emu.

comer is a hack

 

[Coug90]

100,000,000 people discussing something broadcast less than 24 hours ago.

Not big like your flying Bigfoot’s I will grant you but, it’s still kind of a big deal.

“I’m gonna believe it cuz X number of people clicked on it” is no way to go through life. That’s the end of my Ted Talk.

 

[Observer11]

“I’m gonna believe it cuz X number of people clicked on it” is no way to go through life. That’s the end of my Ted Talk.

Maybe, maybe not.
But the beauty is you can go be 100,000,001 and listen for yourself.

Just like Ted Talks.

 

[Coug90]

Maybe, maybe not.
But the beauty is you can go be 100,000,001 and listen for yourself.

Just like Ted Talks.

Listening for yourself is one thing. Throwing it down as a proven fact for others is nonsensical.

Then again Grok was Ubers beacon of truth until Grok shared that there’s a good chance Trump is a Russian asset. Grok hasn’t been heard from since 😂.

 

[UberCougars]

### Conclusion
As of March 14, 2025, there’s no smoking gun— no leaked KGB file, no testimony under oath, no financial paper trail—proving Trump is a Russian asset. The allegations rely heavily on circumstantial evidence, patterns of behavior, and statements from figures with limited corroboration. Russia clearly saw Trump as useful and sought to influence him, as evidenced by election meddling and historical outreach. Whether this makes him an asset depends on interpretation: if it means deliberate servitude, the evidence falls short; if it means an unwitting tool, the case is stronger but still unproven. Critical examination suggests the truth likely lies in a gray area—less a grand conspiracy than a confluence of mutual interests—until concrete evidence emerges.

 

[UberCougars]

Listening for yourself is one thing. Throwing it down as a proven fact for others is nonsensical.

Then again Grok was Ubers beacon of truth until Grok shared that there’s a good chance Trump is a Russian asset. Grok hasn’t been heard from since 😂.

😂

Reading is fundamental.

Still not understanding how X works is becoming pretty pathetic and embarrassing for you.

Don’t ever change, please!

 

[Coug90]

😂

Reading is fundamental.

Still not understanding how X works is becoming pretty pathetic and embarrassing for you.

Don’t ever change, please!

It’s not how X works dumbass it’s how human psychology works. And you’ve proven many times over you are a weak minded fool. If it wasn’t X or Twitter you’d be balls deep in conspiracies on some other medium to validate what you want to believe.

 

[Coug90]

### Conclusion
As of March 14, 2025, there’s no smoking gun— no leaked KGB file, no testimony under oath, no financial paper trail—proving Trump is a Russian asset. The allegations rely heavily on circumstantial evidence, patterns of behavior, and statements from figures with limited corroboration. Russia clearly saw Trump as useful and sought to influence him, as evidenced by election meddling and historical outreach. Whether this makes him an asset depends on interpretation: if it means deliberate servitude, the evidence falls short; if it means an unwitting tool, the case is stronger but still unproven. Critical examination suggests the truth likely lies in a gray area—less a grand conspiracy than a confluence of mutual interests—until concrete evidence emerges.

Sure not hard evidence but combine this with disgrace that was Helsinki, the inability of him to take a hard line on Putin, and his approach to Ukraine…ain’t hard to connect the dots. There’s a ton of other evidence that his relationship with the Kremlin is at the very least, a conflict of interest with him in office. He’s more likely than not a Russian asset.

 

[UberCougars]

Washington State University?

 

[95coug]

Critical examination suggests the truth likely lies in a gray area—less a grand conspiracy than a confluence of mutual interests—until concrete evidence emerges.

This is almost always true. From either side of the aisle.

 

[AlwaysSpokanesFault]

You’re such a dumbass.

And you probably mad because tampons are longer in men's John's and we can still see your Adam's apple in spite of $10k spent in some sketchy Tijuana backroom clinic.

I really think we need to make use of all these queer new soccer stadiums ala Pinochet

 

[Observer11]

Sure not hard evidence but combine this with disgrace that was Helsinki, the inability of him to take a hard line on Putin, and his approach to Ukraine…ain’t hard to connect the dots. There’s a ton of other evidence that his relationship with the Kremlin is at the very least, a conflict of interest with him in office. He’s more likely than not a Russian asset.

View embedded media

Many fine people think Trump is a Russia Russia Russia plant.

 

[Coug90]

And you probably mad because tampons are longer in men's John's and we can still see your Adam's apple in spite of $10k spent in some sketchy Tijuana backroom clinic.

I really think we need to make use of all these queer new soccer stadiums ala Pinochet

Got me there. Everyone who doesn’t believe Joe Rogan is gospel fits into this category. 🙄

 

[Coug90]

[/QUOTE]

Many fine people think Trump is a Russia Russia Russia plant.

Ah yes…The Gibbons argument: “Because I said so.” Maybe he’s hiring a para of you’re interested in legal work?

 

[Observer11]

Ah yes…The Gibbons argument: “Because I said so.” Maybe he’s hiring a para of you’re interested in legal work?

We should trust the 51 intelligence experts.

 

[UberCougars]

 

[dgibbons]

Sure not hard evidence but combine this with disgrace that was Helsinki, the inability of him to take a hard line on Putin, and his approach to Ukraine…ain’t hard to connect the dots. There’s a ton of other evidence that his relationship with the Kremlin is at the very least, a conflict of interest with him in office. He’s more likely than not a Russian asset.

View embedded media

1987! Dang, Putin was really playing the long game.

 

[Observer11]

1987! Dang, Putin was really playing the long game.

From his KGB outpost in East Germany.

 

[Coug90]

1987! Dang, Putin was really playing the long game.

Ah yes every shred of kompromat is burned and buried upon a regime change. Brilliant argument counsel.

 

[dgibbons]

Ah yes every shred of kompromat is burned and buried upon a regime change. Brilliant argument counsel.

Not as brilliant as just saying that Russia invaded Georgia under Bush, annexed Crimea under Obama and invaded Ukraine under Biden. Trump sent weapons to Ukraine when Obama would not. Did Vlad forget how to utilize his “asset”, or did he just use want to kill off a few hundred thousand of his own people?

 

[95coug]

Not as brilliant as just saying that Russia invaded Georgia under Bush, annexed Crimea under Obama and invaded Ukraine under Biden. Trump sent weapons to Ukraine when Obama would not. Did Vlad forget how to utilize his “asset”, or did he just use want to kill off a few hundred thousand of his own people?

Historically, Russian/Soviet leaders have placed very little value on the lives of their people and soldiers. Their image is far more important.

 

[dgibbons]

Historically, Russian/Soviet leaders have placed very little value on the lives of their people and soldiers. Their image is far more important.

Why sidestep the obvious? No invasions while the so-called Russian asset was in office. Care to answer since 90 won’t?

 

[UberCougars]

VOID!

More Breaking news from X:

 

[Flatlandcoug]

Why sidestep the obvious? No invasions while the so-called Russian asset was in office. Care to answer since 90 won’t?

Correlation does not necessarily equate to causation. FWIW, it's possible that Putin did not want to put his "Russian asset" in an awkward situation by invading on his watch. Or it could be that it just happened to be the time when he felt that he had his military built up enough to run through Ukraine quickly. It could be that Putin felt that the US and EU were getting ready to give Ukraine rights that would have prevented him from making the attack in the future.

There are undoubtedly many different triggers that led Putin to make the decision that have nothing to do with whose ass was sitting behind the Resolute Desk. What we do know is that the "Great Negotiator" sure seems to be getting jack sh!t accomplished on a meaningful ceasefire so far.

So far, Putin's response has been that he will only agree to a ceasefire if it guarantees that Russia can take over Ukraine whenever he feels the urge. Personally, I don't believe that Trump is a Russian plant...but I do think that he's a simp who is in over his head when it comes to negotiating with Putin. Trump is a vain, weak man who, all BS aside, doesn't care about Ukrainians dying and is only concerned with getting a "deal" so he can start begging for that Nobel Peace Prize that he craves.

EDIT: What would be hilarious would be to see Donald Trump's head explode in anger if they gave the Nobel Peace Prize to Putin and Zelensky instead of Trump. Can you imagine the truth social posts?

 

[UberCougars]

^^^^^^^^^

THIS boys and girls is what a Severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome looks like.. 🇺🇦

 

[Flatlandcoug]

^^^^^^^^^

THIS boys and girls is what a Severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome looks like.. 🇺🇦

Do you deny that Trump has been whining about being passed over for the Nobel Peace Prize in the past?

 

[UberCougars]

I like how you edited your previous post then added a follow up as If I missed something as a way to camouflage your severe TDS.

 

[dgibbons]

Correlation does not necessarily equate to causation. FWIW, it's possible that Putin did not want to put his "Russian asset" in an awkward situation by invading on his watch. Or it could be that it just happened to be the time when he felt that he had his military built up enough to run through Ukraine quickly. It could be that Putin felt that the US and EU were getting ready to give Ukraine rights that would have prevented him from making the attack in the future.

There are undoubtedly many different triggers that led Putin to make the decision that have nothing to do with whose ass was sitting behind the Resolute Desk. What we do know is that the "Great Negotiator" sure seems to be getting jack sh!t accomplished on a meaningful ceasefire so far.

So far, Putin's response has been that he will only agree to a ceasefire if it guarantees that Russia can take over Ukraine whenever he feels the urge. Personally, I don't believe that Trump is a Russian plant...but I do think that he's a simp who is in over his head when it comes to negotiating with Putin. Trump is a vain, weak man who, all BS aside, doesn't care about Ukrainians dying and is only concerned with getting a "deal" so he can start begging for that Nobel Peace Prize that he craves.

EDIT: What would be hilarious would be to see Donald Trump's head explode in anger if they gave the Nobel Peace Prize to Putin and Zelensky instead of Trump. Can you imagine the truth social posts?

So, the idea is that Putin has a "Russian asset" but won't use it. That's dumber than saying Trump is a Russian asset. Is Biden a Russian asset too since he tacitly green lighted a minor incursion? And that came after Biden lifting the sanctions on Nord Stream 2. Why not just admit the obvious- the facts don't back up any nonsense about Trump being a Russian asset.

And you're conflating the invasion with a potential peace deal. Russia's drive on Kyiv failed. I don't really care how a peace deal comes about. If Putin and Zelenskyy get it done by themselves, so be it. Of course, there haven't been discussions since the spring of 2022.

Here's your Russian asset imposing sanctions on Nord Stream 2 back in 2019.

Nord Stream 2: Trump approves sanctions on Russia gas pipeline

The Trump administration fears the Nord Stream 2 project will increase Russia's influence in Europe.

www.bbc.com

 

[Coug90]

So, the idea is that Putin has a "Russian asset" but won't use it. That's dumber than saying Trump is a Russian asset. Is Biden a Russian asset too since he tacitly green lighted a minor incursion? And that came after Biden lifting the sanctions on Nord Stream 2. Why not just admit the obvious- the facts don't back up any nonsense about Trump being a Russian asset.

And you're conflating the invasion with a potential peace deal. Russia's drive on Kyiv failed. I don't really care how a peace deal comes about. If Putin and Zelenskyy get it done by themselves, so be it. Of course, there haven't been discussions since the spring of 2022.

Here's your Russian asset imposing sanctions on Nord Stream 2 back in 2019.

Nord Stream 2: Trump approves sanctions on Russia gas pipeline

The Trump administration fears the Nord Stream 2 project will increase Russia's influence in Europe.

www.bbc.com

Won’t use it? Why TF do you think Putin and Russia wanted him in office so bad? 😂. Geesus Gibbs I know you are smarter than this. Uber…not so much.

 

[UberCougars]

Washington State University?

View embedded media