1.Education from a world renowned College football coach, personalized. Regardless of play time.
2.A power 5 football program education, more generalized. Regardless of play time.
3.A power 5 school education. Which is the most important.
4.A completely unique college experience that he'll never be able to duplicate, whereas so many other colleges have their uniqueness, but not like Pullman.
5.A camaraderie of players that know he's been here from the get-go, not some kid that flies in at night. That's something special. To stick through with his classmates through it all is a bond that's never recovered.
6. And ultimately, a chance. Think what would have happened if our QB hadn't broke his ankle/foot/whatever and Falk didn't see the field that day. The unknown is something. Think if that one kid hadn't transferred to Montana, then Louisville... he'd very well could have gotten the nod instead of Falk. Transferring is a gamble, point blank. Transfer and you close as many doors as you open, many of the times. It's all individualized but I still don't see better options for his future, his TRUE future, as long as WSU gives him the educational options he wants other than football.
From your question, it sounds like you see more options for his future if he transfers? Please outline, if that's accurate. Recognize, I don't see the NFL as a true option. Because if it was a true option for him, he'd be on the top of the list for WSU. Not 3rd/4th. So it's about quality of life, his friends, his education. NOT Play time. Very personalized. And I'm assuming he saw more to WSU than just a step to the NFL.
Have you spoken with Neville about your highlighted statement? I don't presume to know what he's really thinking but I'd be surprised if he didn't care about playing time. The vast majority of high level athletes that I've known were very competitive people that cared about being on the field above everything else. I was roommates for a summer with one of the basketball players on our team when I was at WSU and a bunch of the players partied at our house. My next door neighbor in the dorm as a freshman was a running back for the Cougs. I don't recall either one of them (or their friends) express that it was ok if they never played because it was just about the education and quality of life. Neither one was a starter and the running back dropped off the team after his sophomore season when he realized that he wasn't going to ever start.
I'm not sure how meaningful #1 is if you don't get to play. I get the feeling that Leach is so intense in what he does that if you are the #3 or #4 guy on the list, your personalized education from Leach is going to be at a relative distance.
Are points #2 and #3 the same? Education is important and I think that WSU is a good university, but I've never had someone in Kansas say, "Wow, WSU.....you must have been a great student to get in there!" or "I've heard that WSU is one of the top schools in the country". What I hear more than anything else is, "WSU.....is that the Huskies?" Or I hear, "I know Stanford and Cal are great schools, how does WSU compare to them?" A WSU education is fine, but for a kid from California or other parts of the country, there are a dozen schools that are more meaningful locally when it comes to the branding of their education.
Agree 100% on #4. Pullman is a unique place and while every school has their pros and cons, there is no other "major" college like WSU where the immersion is so complete.
#5 has some value but I'll say that the running back that I mentioned above valued his regular friends at WSU more than he valued his teammates. That may mean that Neville stays at WSU because of his regular friends though.
#6 is probably the least compelling reason to stay. If you are #3 or #4 on the depth chart (and Neville could end up being #5 this year), the odds of seeing the field are ridiculously low. If Cooper ends up being as good as I think he could be, and Leach continues to keep recruiting QB's, Neville may end up never getting above #3 on the depth chart. It happens where schools end up with their #3 guy on the field, but the odds are likely more than 95% that the #3 guy never sees a minute of meaningful game time.
None of us know how it's going to turn out for Neville or what's important to him but the current transfer mania that we are seeing tells me that top tier athletes would rather start at a "lesser" school than sit on the bench with a clean uniform and a top notch education. Again, WSU saw the 2012, 2013 and 2014 QB recruits transfer away to get playing time. I wish Neville the best and hope he ends up being happy with whatever he does.