If they're going to shut down workouts due to "eight positive or presumed positive COVID-19 tests from individuals who were on campus in the past week," it really is hard to see football happening.
8 tests on the FB team or 8 tests on campus?
I'm extremely lucky to be doing what I do for work, but mark my words: this second wave push back is going to be even more draconian than the first wave. People are literally losing their minds over this, and a lot of low risk people are going to be severely damaged financially and economically for a long time because of how we are (not) managing the risk surrounding this disease.Now the #1 men’s tennis player in the world tested positive. I get we need to protect the at risk category, but this is going to cost a lot of low risk individuals opportunities.
It is pretty clear at this point that aerosol transmission is the source of most of the infections. Surface contact can do it, and aerosol and contact work pretty effectively together, but aerosol has been the primary delivery system this time around. That is a significant change from what we previously understood. It has a significant impact on what I do for a living, and the past 4 months have been a real learning curve.
Risk is not just to those getting sick; it is to those they in turn infect. That is how epidemics spread, and how low-risk individuals make others who are not low-risk sick.
Means exist to manage the situation, but a key element involves wearing masks when around others, due to the aerosol impact. We have a group of folks who don't get that. Ignorance is fine; it can be corrected. But when someone makes a conscious choice to remain ignorant in the face of the information, it crosses over into some mix of stupidity and lack of concern for others.
As long as we have people who refuse to wear masks, we can't manage the virus exposure in easier and less business-intrusive ways. I'm sure all those mask-less people think that they are done with the virus, but unfortunately, the virus is not done with them...or us...or me.
If you are interested, here is a representative example of how engineering and science are moving. The only thing new about this for me when I read it was the relationship between relative humidity and aerosol transfer. Other info I've read since then has made it clear that while 6' might be adequate social distance in an environment in the 40-60% RH range, during a Santa Ana condition in SoCal (when RH dips below 10%), the social distance aerosol transmission distance is probably more like 12-15'.
https://www.ashrae.org/file library/about/position documents/pd_infectiousaerosols_2020.pdf
Over and over again I'm having to try to explain to folks that I work with that the path forward until Covid is resolved that permits us to stay in business with the least disruption relies on our adherence to what we know to be optimum social behavior. Hygiene, distance, short time duration in congested areas and masks when around others are the biggies.
If you want to minimize the need for any additional or subsequent shutdowns, wear the masks. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't b!tch when infection rates climb and further mandatory steps are needed. It is within our control. Unfortunately, some people have no self control.
"...until covid is resolved...". This is a problem.It is pretty clear at this point that aerosol transmission is the source of most of the infections. Surface contact can do it, and aerosol and contact work pretty effectively together, but aerosol has been the primary delivery system this time around. That is a significant change from what we previously understood. It has a significant impact on what I do for a living, and the past 4 months have been a real learning curve.
Risk is not just to those getting sick; it is to those they in turn infect. That is how epidemics spread, and how low-risk individuals make others who are not low-risk sick.
Means exist to manage the situation, but a key element involves wearing masks when around others, due to the aerosol impact. We have a group of folks who don't get that. Ignorance is fine; it can be corrected. But when someone makes a conscious choice to remain ignorant in the face of the information, it crosses over into some mix of stupidity and lack of concern for others.
As long as we have people who refuse to wear masks, we can't manage the virus exposure in easier and less business-intrusive ways. I'm sure all those mask-less people think that they are done with the virus, but unfortunately, the virus is not done with them...or us...or me.
If you are interested, here is a representative example of how engineering and science are moving. The only thing new about this for me when I read it was the relationship between relative humidity and aerosol transfer. Other info I've read since then has made it clear that while 6' might be adequate social distance in an environment in the 40-60% RH range, during a Santa Ana condition in SoCal (when RH dips below 10%), the social distance aerosol transmission distance is probably more like 12-15'.
https://www.ashrae.org/file library/about/position documents/pd_infectiousaerosols_2020.pdf
Over and over again I'm having to try to explain to folks that I work with that the path forward until Covid is resolved that permits us to stay in business with the least disruption relies on our adherence to what we know to be optimum social behavior. Hygiene, distance, short time duration in congested areas and masks when around others are the biggies.
If you want to minimize the need for any additional or subsequent shutdowns, wear the masks. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't b!tch when infection rates climb and further mandatory steps are needed. It is within our control. Unfortunately, some people have no self control.
It is pretty clear at this point that aerosol transmission is the source of most of the infections. Surface contact can do it, and aerosol and contact work pretty effectively together, but aerosol has been the primary delivery system this time around. That is a significant change from what we previously understood. It has a significant impact on what I do for a living, and the past 4 months have been a real learning curve.
Risk is not just to those getting sick; it is to those they in turn infect. That is how epidemics spread, and how low-risk individuals make others who are not low-risk sick.
Means exist to manage the situation, but a key element involves wearing masks when around others, due to the aerosol impact. We have a group of folks who don't get that. Ignorance is fine; it can be corrected. But when someone makes a conscious choice to remain ignorant in the face of the information, it crosses over into some mix of stupidity and lack of concern for others.
As long as we have people who refuse to wear masks, we can't manage the virus exposure in easier and less business-intrusive ways. I'm sure all those mask-less people think that they are done with the virus, but unfortunately, the virus is not done with them...or us...or me.
If you are interested, here is a representative example of how engineering and science are moving. The only thing new about this for me when I read it was the relationship between relative humidity and aerosol transfer. Other info I've read since then has made it clear that while 6' might be adequate social distance in an environment in the 40-60% RH range, during a Santa Ana condition in SoCal (when RH dips below 10%), the social distance aerosol transmission distance is probably more like 12-15'.
https://www.ashrae.org/file library/about/position documents/pd_infectiousaerosols_2020.pdf
Over and over again I'm having to try to explain to folks that I work with that the path forward until Covid is resolved that permits us to stay in business with the least disruption relies on our adherence to what we know to be optimum social behavior. Hygiene, distance, short time duration in congested areas and masks when around others are the biggies.
If you want to minimize the need for any additional or subsequent shutdowns, wear the masks. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't b!tch when infection rates climb and further mandatory steps are needed. It is within our control. Unfortunately, some people have no self control.
It is pretty clear at this point that aerosol transmission is the source of most of the infections. Surface contact can do it, and aerosol and contact work pretty effectively together, but aerosol has been the primary delivery system this time around. That is a significant change from what we previously understood. It has a significant impact on what I do for a living, and the past 4 months have been a real learning curve.
Risk is not just to those getting sick; it is to those they in turn infect. That is how epidemics spread, and how low-risk individuals make others who are not low-risk sick.
Means exist to manage the situation, but a key element involves wearing masks when around others, due to the aerosol impact. We have a group of folks who don't get that. Ignorance is fine; it can be corrected. But when someone makes a conscious choice to remain ignorant in the face of the information, it crosses over into some mix of stupidity and lack of concern for others.
As long as we have people who refuse to wear masks, we can't manage the virus exposure in easier and less business-intrusive ways. I'm sure all those mask-less people think that they are done with the virus, but unfortunately, the virus is not done with them...or us...or me.
If you are interested, here is a representative example of how engineering and science are moving. The only thing new about this for me when I read it was the relationship between relative humidity and aerosol transfer. Other info I've read since then has made it clear that while 6' might be adequate social distance in an environment in the 40-60% RH range, during a Santa Ana condition in SoCal (when RH dips below 10%), the social distance aerosol transmission distance is probably more like 12-15'.
https://www.ashrae.org/file library/about/position documents/pd_infectiousaerosols_2020.pdf
Over and over again I'm having to try to explain to folks that I work with that the path forward until Covid is resolved that permits us to stay in business with the least disruption relies on our adherence to what we know to be optimum social behavior. Hygiene, distance, short time duration in congested areas and masks when around others are the biggies.
If you want to minimize the need for any additional or subsequent shutdowns, wear the masks. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't b!tch when infection rates climb and further mandatory steps are needed. It is within our control. Unfortunately, some people have no self control.
Now the #1 men’s tennis player in the world tested positive. I get we need to protect the at risk category, but this is going to cost a lot of low risk individuals opportunities.
Honestly the best response to this that I ever saw came from Alonzo Mourning, who years ago pointed out that players didn't create the marketplace. TV money and merchandising and ticket revenue created the marketplace. I understand everyday people busting their butts resenting athletes getting paid crazy money to play a game. I do. But I think the owners get off light, because they aren't on TV much (except for say, Jerry Jones) but they rake in INSANE amounts of revenue. Back before the Super Bowl era, part of the reason players made jack is because there wasn't THAT much money to be had in owning a team either. Not a lot to go around after overhead. By the 80s things had changed, and eventually the unions forced a more equitable solution. Individual knuckleheads aside, I'm ok with players demanding 'market value' for their services (given that market value fluctuates, usually up), since they sacrifice their bodies and in some cases minds for a few years to be our gladiators and then have to go off and do something else that they may not always be equipped to do. I'm less sympathetic to an ownership group that never hesitates to hold a city hostage for a new stadium complex that they don't have to pay for, that rakes in crazy money off broadcast and merch rights, and that has very little trouble sabotaging seasons when they think it's in their financial interests to do so, because they know regular fans will throw their hate at the players because they're more visible.
10% humidity in Central Washington is fairly common. May partially explain the high infection rates in Yakima and Tri-Cities.
I was thinking all the fruit packing sheds.
Most food operations require masks, have temp checks, and partitioning between workers. Also have modified lunch and break rooms.The ag industry may not have much social distancing.
That too for sure.I was thinking all the fruit packing sheds.
Most food operations require masks, have temp checks, and partitioning between workers. Also have modified lunch and break rooms.
One issue is that a lot of families work together at these plants, so if one gets it they all get it.
in 1968 we had about 3.5 billion people....in that year, one million died of the Hong Kong flu.....since our population is over twice that now, we'd have to have 2 million people die to be as bad as the Hong Kong flu....we're at about half a million in the world....
and we live in a world today where there is massive intercontinental travel....and even then, we are no where near the Hong Kong flu numbers....
testing has dramatically increased and the number of positives reflects that.......deaths however are greatly diminished...
I wonder if we told the vulnerable, if they WANTED to, to stay home and let all the other people out and about, would we have achieved herd immunity by now?.....as it is, the virus is slowly passing over society and we'll have people in panic for a couple of yrs...
its insanity.....
its hard to even imagine "measles parties" back in the day...
To circle back around to athletics and liability, particularly with student athletes in team contact sports, I have to wonder how many people in risk management don't want to go NEAR this for fear of what might transpire. The market may solve what others do not. Just as businesses won't have customers whether people comply with the distancing rules, or not. Not complying just means fewer customers for a longer period of time. Just like people denying climate change until the ocean eats their house and they can't get insurance. Reality catches up eventuallyI do not believe it is an equitable comparison between viruses and eras. For this reason.... we have huge hospitals, advanced medicine, advanced equipment, the most amount of healthcare professionals with the most education ever....
To compare numbers from 1968 or 1919 when there were none of those people or things available to now when all of those people and things are available isnt a fair comparison.
To circle back around to athletics and liability, particularly with student athletes in team contact sports, I have to wonder how many people in risk management don't want to go NEAR this for fear of what might transpire. The market may solve what others do not. Just as businesses won't have customers whether people comply with the distancing rules, or not. Not complying just means fewer customers for a longer period of time. Just like people denying climate change until the ocean eats their house and they can't get insurance. Reality catches up eventually
Bingo. And if you look at the counties still in Phase I (Benton, Franklin, chelan, Douglas, Yakima) what do they all share? Lots of ag jobs, lots of processing plants.Most food operations require masks, have temp checks, and partitioning between workers. Also have modified lunch and break rooms.
One issue is that a lot of families work together at these plants, so if one gets it they all get it.
Yes, but that isn't the real issue.I guess we are to the point where people testing negative for a disease which isn't harmful for most people under 65 is a sign we can't play sports.
think you meant "suite", and don't forget "bathroom".Realtors in Houston are pushing for the ban of the term Master with regard to “suit” or “bedroom”. Common man.
Next they’ll try to eliminate master baiters.think you meant "suite", and don't forget "bathroom".
because, Lord knows there are no other connotations or context for the word "master".
Also in that article - "master sommolier" will not longer gain that title. Probably going to go with "really, really, really good sommolier."
Next they’ll try to eliminate master baiters.