ADVERTISEMENT

I've seen enough

Oregon poaching Leach's best assistants on a yearly basis (not to mention other departures like Manning going to UCLA) really drove home for me that long-term major success at WSU is nearly impossible absent more institutional support (i.e., more debt and/or money, and as we know, more debt isn't going to happen anytime soon). Not just "hard," in the same way it's hard for any program and almost unheard of for non-blue bloods absent major changes in circumstance (e.g., Oregon/Okie State), but just about impossible. I believe that to the extent Leach didn't already know that, it cemented it for him, too, and that is one of the things that led him to look around and bail (even if one grants that him being open to bail also contributed to further losses of assistants or, while I disagree that he was, any degree of being "checked out" that people have claimed).

Even with a coach capable of building up to a team #2 in the country in a disadvantaged spot, and on a materially similar track here, having assembled a staff that was pretty great by WSU standards--the one Leach had a few years in with Grinch, Salavea, Wilson, Manning, Sage, Mastro, etc.--it all could be derailed easily by a program with more money and otherwise preferable circumstances (easier recruiting, higher profile, better facilities, etc.) luring away assistants. No coach in America, and certainly not any that WSU reasonably could hope to hire or keep around long-term, could overcome that by consistently executing perfect hires every winter from a pool of Mountain West graduates and retreads / unusual situations and overcoming any discontinuity on the recruiting trail, especially with WSU's structural limitations on that front.
We can always hope one of our graduates goes on to be the founder of a multi-billion dollar company and really likes football...

Outside of that, you're spot on.
 
One out-of-the-box idea, albeit not likely to happen with Dickert the interim guy for pragmatic reasons, might be Kwiatkowski. I don't think he's ever pushed hard to be a head coach, but he sure can run a defense, might be motivated to really put Jimmy in his place, as he could do at WSU, and he's a Boise guy who has a lot of connections from having been at Boise for so long and then in the Pac-12, and is from the Petersen tree. Imagine him as the head guy running the defense. He could tout the record of getting players in the NFL, and it seems (albeit just a feeling) that we get more benefit from a "name" guy on defense recruiting difference-makers there, whereas with any OC running a fairly interesting scheme, we should be able to get the same kind of skill players on offense we typically could expect to get. Even Wulff without the FOB or stadium upgrades was able to recruit some pretty solid offensive skill players (Wilson, Tuel, Galvin, Dom Williams, and others) mainly due to just having the Pac-12 logo on his shirt. Just a thought. Really amazing, but almost certainly infeasible, might be Banks at HC and Kwiatkowski as associate head coach / DC, although I know pulling him out of UT will be virtually impossible. Non-zero chance Sark is out as early as next year, though, given how things are going at Texas.
 
Everyone who is eligible. Last year didn’t count.
So any player that is currently listed as a Sr or RS Sr has another year?
The only losses are those listed as Gr? If this is accurate we have some meat left on the bone.
 
Just stop recruiting WA because biggs says so. Genius. Do just the opposite.

Gleason
Withrow
Dunning
McEndoo
McWashington
Lindell
Boose
Doyle
Hollimon


Coleman
Trufant
Bassler
Dunning
Williams
Long
Genatone
Derting
That's a handful of names who graduated from HS 20-30 years ago. If Washington was so rich with talent, would you remember specific names? And would you have to reach back more than 5 years?
 
I don't know enough about their athletic department to say whether or not CJL will be there in two years, but simply the fact that they hired him in the first place would seem to indicate that they aren't all that interested in fielding a championship contending team. He was a quick, lazy hire, and his shit talking would have made me question if his temperament and maturity was where it needed to be to prosper as a HC, but that's just me.
Those delusional jackwads thought he was gonna take Pete’s success to the next level. It was a stupid hire and I’m thrilled now as I was then that they did it.
 
That's a handful of names who graduated from HS 20-30 years ago. If Washington was so rich with talent, would you remember specific names? And would you have to reach back more than 5 years?
So Abe Lucas and Andre Dillard shouldn't have been recruited?

Peyton Pelleur, Issac Dotson?

Or do you hate bowl games?
 
Last edited:
Just stop recruiting WA because biggs says so. Genius. Do just the opposite.

Gleason
Withrow
Dunning
McEndoo
McWashington
Lindell
Boose
Doyle
Hollimon


Coleman
Trufant
Bassler
Dunning
Williams
Long
Genatone
Derting
Don't forget about Torey Hunter, (now in his third year with the BC Lions).
 
The OL worries me. I assume that Beresford will move to RT, and Fifita takes over at guard. No clue who will play LT. So, LT is ?, LG is Kingston, C is Gomness, RG is Fifita, RT is Beresford. WR is concerning too. Stribling is fine, but isn't go to blow the top off coverage. Losing Jackson and Harris is going to hurt.

The D is going to be duct tape for another year, but the underclassmen are there.

Next year's O-line.
LT: Fifita
LG: Kingston
C: Greene
RG: Gomness/Tailavea
RT: Beresford

Obviously they'll need to be coached up but it's not a completely green group.
 
That's a handful of names who graduated from HS 20-30 years ago. If Washington was so rich with talent, would you remember specific names? And would you have to reach back more than 5 years?
my thoughts exactly
So Abe Lucas and Andre Dillard shouldn't have been recruited?

Peyton Pelleur, Issac Dotson?

Or do you hate bowl games?
nobody said don't recruit washington, it just doesn't make sense to waste resources doing it. make a pass through the state, where there is interest pursue it, it can't be
a recruiting focal point
 
my thoughts exactly

nobody said don't recruit washington, it just doesn't make sense to waste resources doing it. make a pass through the state, where there is interest pursue it, it can't be
a recruiting focal point

Looks like there are 24 kids in WA that are 3 stars or better. 9 in Oregon. 110 in California.

In the West? 225.
In Texas? 225.
In Florida? 250.
In the South? 690.
 
If you think Chun is a bad AD, you haven't been around Cougar football very long. Look at the hires he has made, all have done well, even Rolo appeared to be turning the corner and looked like a good hire. Problem is he painted himself and WSU into a corner with is conspiracy, anti vax stance, which no one could have foreseen. I hated to see him go, but Rolo is gone, get over it, and he has no one to blame but himself. Chun is not a problem.
 
by what metric did he earn that title? because giving has increased? So has everyone else's, we're still bottom third of the P12 and way below giving nationally.
We have had record years under his watch. If you want to credit that to inflation, then go ahead. But it stinks of sour grapes.

He also hired Ethridge, Smith, and Greene.
 
my thoughts exactly

nobody said don't recruit washington, it just doesn't make sense to waste resources doing it. make a pass through the state, where there is interest pursue it, it can't be
a recruiting focal point
Actually biggs tossed it out there.
 
As a life long medical/dental area manager, it's hard for me to understand some of the recruiting challenges I always hear about. How many coaches are allowed to actively recruit? 8? 10? 12?

Looking at the numbers Biggs posted, let's say there are 100-150 recruit worthy prospects in WA/OR/Northern CA. Of those, there are probably 50 or so that you keep on your hot list. So again, as a territory manager who has worked 5 state territories my entire career, how difficult is it to recruit the Hell out of your designated area? I know they have other responsibilities, and often times you have to hand off recruits to other coaches where the personality and cultural common ground is stronger, but it shouldn't be that difficult to manage a recruiting territory of up to 200 prospects.
 
As a life long medical/dental area manager, it's hard for me to understand some of the recruiting challenges I always hear about. How many coaches are allowed to actively recruit? 8? 10? 12?

Looking at the numbers Biggs posted, let's say there are 100-150 recruit worthy prospects in WA/OR/Northern CA. Of those, there are probably 50 or so that you keep on your hot list. So again, as a territory manager who has worked 5 state territories my entire career, how difficult is it to recruit the Hell out of your designated area? I know they have other responsibilities, and often times you have to hand off recruits to other coaches where the personality and cultural common ground is stronger, but it shouldn't be that difficult to manage a recruiting territory of up to 200 prospects.

Couple things… It isn’t just the 225 in the West, you recruit the juniors and sophs too. So the number, while varying in amount of time contacted, is bigger than it appears.

Hands in the pie is much bigger… All 12 league schools are involved to some degree. Other conferences will show up as well. Assuming every Pac 12 team took the max of 25,,,, there is a shortfall of talent.

The collection of info, evaluation of talent and management of time on the road is what’s most important. The travel time and amount of time spent if you wanted to meet every single kid is enormous when compared to, say, Texas. Where you could see just as much talent in 1 state.
 
Couple things… It isn’t just the 225 in the West, you recruit the juniors and sophs too. So the number, while varying in amount of time contacted, is bigger than it appears.

Hands in the pie is much bigger… All 12 league schools are involved to some degree. Other conferences will show up as well. Assuming every Pac 12 team took the max of 25,,,, there is a shortfall of talent.

The collection of info, evaluation of talent and management of time on the road is what’s most important. The travel time and amount of time spent if you wanted to meet every single kid is enormous when compared to, say, Texas. Where you could see just as much talent in 1 state.
That's a good point, and it explains the time demands much more clearly. Still though, how many coaches actively recruit? That will clarify the number or prospects each one has to manage.
 
That's a good point, and it explains the time demands much more clearly. Still though, how many coaches actively recruit? That will clarify the number or prospects each one has to manage.

They all have to recruit.

For perspective, there was a time when WSU had 2 coaches recruiting Washington…. and there wasn’t 24 prospects at that time either..
 
And I like what I see.
Dickert took over this program under the worst possible situation.
He kept the team together, cobbled together a coaching staff, and produced 8 solid quarters of football against tough teams.
This is the biggest win since the 2018 season. And it was smart football.
I move to offer him the head coach position on the flight home, so he can start recruiting.
Do I have a second?
It’s early but I like what I see. If they take down the Ducks I’d be just about ready to sign him up. Anyone hired us going to come with risks. Provided he can articulate a good offensive plan and can bring in some recruiters I’d pull the trigger.
 
It’s early but I like what I see. If they take down the Ducks I’d be just about ready to sign him up. Anyone hired us going to come with risks. Provided he can articulate a good offensive plan and can bring in some recruiters I’d pull the trigger.

I think Chun calls Chris Petersen 1st...then gives Dickert a hard look.

Normally I would be excited about CP...but not a fan of his offense and his QBs didn't seem to improve.

Then there is the continuity issue.

But he wins. That's the bottom line.
 
When we have discussed Wulff's tenure ad nauseam the topic of his lack of contacts in the industry has come up. As young as Dickert is, does he have enough connections for hiring the right coaches for a P5 program? What about recruiting connections? I believe the business often is "who you know".
Exactly. Dickert seems like a great dude and is doing a fine job, but...

Wyoming
South Dakota St
Minnesota St
Augustana (?)
Southeast Missouri St
South Dakota
North Dakota St
Wisconsin-Stevens Point

These are the places he's coached prior to WSU. Where is the OC coming from? We've seen how a coach with very few P5 connections worked out.
 
Problem he hasn't been around many P5 programs and Bohl carries the same issue. Bohl has shown the ability to unearth small town Midwest kids with blue collar work ethics and turn them into a solid FB team. He did this into NDSU and is doing it at Wyoming (maybe not this year). The better contact is probably Hazelton. Hopefully they are friendly.

The recruiting game HS coaches play with WSU is simple. Steer the kids with options away from WSU, sell FCS and fringe mountain west kids to WSU. Local coaches went ballistic with Leach for not playing that game. Fortunately, he had enough respect nationally that coaches didn't poo poo us too much.
Tracy Ford throwing a temper tantrum that we wouldn't offer his fringy kids, while I guarantee he never did, nor ever will steer a kid towards us if that kid has any other Pac12 offers.

Unfortunate thing is, the know nothing blowhards on local sports radio bought it hook, line & sinker.
 
Well…I didn’t think I would bring up rolos name, but do you think there is a ton of difference in recruiting cache between Rolo and Dickert?

Here is the next question , who will they hire that brings in mike leach type of cache? Harrell? Nope. So who? Urban Meyer?

I do have concerns of Dickert. And the reason being is two fold. We lost out when Doba moved away from big play offense to more of a ball control offense. That hurt recruiting . That hurt because as we saw against BYU we don’t have the man power or the patience to string 8 plays 80!yards today get it in the end zone .

I think WSU will be fine even on the back seven even losing all the players we lose . I think banker reloads like he did at osu. I think Dickert will get good linebacker play despite losing players .

I do like Leafs idea of getting brink on the staff . He can articulate and communicate ideas very well, and he knows the game inside and out, and he believes there has to be a system in place that produces big plays.

Mike Leach was once a lifetime, fluke that fell into our laps. I don't know that "Mike Leach type cache" should be a prerequisite for the job. Guys with that kind of resume aren't sitting around, unless you want to plug your nose and hire Art Briles (I don't).

And no thanks to Brink, unless he wants to just be an analyst of some sort. If he wants to get into coaching, he can cut his teeth at the lower levels first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KRUSTYtheCOUG
The recruiting game HS coaches play with WSU is simple. Steer the kids with options away from WSU, sell FCS and fringe mountain west kids to WSU. Local coaches went ballistic with Leach for not playing that game. Fortunately, he had enough respect nationally that coaches didn't poo poo us too much.
Bingo. The so called experts then double down on this nonsense when a school like Eastern has a good year, ripping on WSU for "turning their nose up" at those players. Problem is, for every Cooper Kupp that gets missed, there are a thousand kids playing for EWU that aren't Pac 12 caliber.
 
One out-of-the-box idea, albeit not likely to happen with Dickert the interim guy for pragmatic reasons, might be Kwiatkowski. I don't think he's ever pushed hard to be a head coach, but he sure can run a defense, might be motivated to really put Jimmy in his place, as he could do at WSU, and he's a Boise guy who has a lot of connections from having been at Boise for so long and then in the Pac-12, and is from the Petersen tree. Imagine him as the head guy running the defense. He could tout the record of getting players in the NFL, and it seems (albeit just a feeling) that we get more benefit from a "name" guy on defense recruiting difference-makers there, whereas with any OC running a fairly interesting scheme, we should be able to get the same kind of skill players on offense we typically could expect to get. Even Wulff without the FOB or stadium upgrades was able to recruit some pretty solid offensive skill players (Wilson, Tuel, Galvin, Dom Williams, and others) mainly due to just having the Pac-12 logo on his shirt. Just a thought. Really amazing, but almost certainly infeasible, might be Banks at HC and Kwiatkowski as associate head coach / DC, although I know pulling him out of UT will be virtually impossible. Non-zero chance Sark is out as early as next year, though, given how things are going at Texas.

Guy is 55 and has been coaching for 33 years. Sometimes career coordinators are not HCs for a reason.
 
Tracy Ford throwing a temper tantrum that we wouldn't offer his fringy kids, while I guarantee he never did, nor ever will steer a kid towards us if that kid has any other Pac12 offers.

Unfortunate thing is, the know nothing blowhards on local sports radio bought it hook, line & sinker.
The Oregonian's OSU beat writer seems enthralled with Tracy Ford and what he has to offer. Maybe some of those players Ford was peddling for WSU are going to end up in Corvallis. He will still save the best ones for "top tier" programs.

OSU hungry for Ford's scraps

Glad Cougar
 
So Abe Lucas and Andre Dillard shouldn't have been recruited?

Peyton Pelleur, Issac Dotson?

Or do you hate bowl games?
O'Connell & Cole Madison too. Leach was great at allocating exactly the right number of scholarships he needed in WA, and he was largely criticized for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coug1990
Bingo. The so called experts then double down on this nonsense when a school like Eastern has a good year, ripping on WSU for "turning their nose up" at those players. Problem is, for every Cooper Kupp that gets missed, there are a thousand kids playing for EWU that aren't Pac 12 caliber.

Just because you play well in the Big Sky doesnt mean you would play well in the Pac 12. It isnt unreasonable to take a look at the All League list and see if you were or werent correct on your evaluation of the kid.

We have seen a few Big Sky qbs move up to the Pac 12 and never see the field. And those guys shredded that league…
 
  • Like
Reactions: wazzucougs96
Couple things… It isn’t just the 225 in the West, you recruit the juniors and sophs too. So the number, while varying in amount of time contacted, is bigger than it appears.

Hands in the pie is much bigger… All 12 league schools are involved to some degree. Other conferences will show up as well. Assuming every Pac 12 team took the max of 25,,,, there is a shortfall of talent.

The collection of info, evaluation of talent and management of time on the road is what’s most important. The travel time and amount of time spent if you wanted to meet every single kid is enormous when compared to, say, Texas. Where you could see just as much talent in 1 state.

You also have to look at all of the 2 star guys that might have a high ceiling with some development. Mike Leach's 2019 class had 6 guys rated 2 stars or less.
 
You also have to look at all of the 2 star guys that might have a high ceiling with some development. Mike Leach's 2019 class had 6 guys rated 2 stars or less.
And, you also have to consider that the ratings services tend to look at the skill set and how it translates to the average/typical team and system. If you're running a niche O or D, those ratings don't necessarily translate. Some of the elite prospects probably have the skills to work in almost any system, but especially once you get down to the 2-3 star kids, you have to take a close look at how they work in yours. A kid rated 2-star in a pro style offense might be a 4-star in R&S.

Drew Bledsoe was a great QB for a single back spread offense. Might not have worked as well in the Air Raid. Wouldn't work at all in RPO.
 
Lets say we keep Dickert.

Would love to bring on Price as a recruiting and roster management consultant or another old wise coach. Ed mentioned it before.

They had Mouse Davis helping out at Hawaii. Maybe he or June Junes would like to help out?

Just throwing it out there. Price probably just wants to chill...but he will probably in nearby Lake Coeur d'Alene during fall camp.
 
And, you also have to consider that the ratings services tend to look at the skill set and how it translates to the average/typical team and system. If you're running a niche O or D, those ratings don't necessarily translate. Some of the elite prospects probably have the skills to work in almost any system, but especially once you get down to the 2-3 star kids, you have to take a close look at how they work in yours. A kid rated 2-star in a pro style offense might be a 4-star in R&S.

Drew Bledsoe was a great QB for a single back spread offense. Might not have worked as well in the Air Raid. Wouldn't work at all in RPO.

Bledsoe would light the world on fire in the AR.
 
Lets say we keep Dickert.

Would love to bring on Price as a recruiting and roster management consultant or another old wise coach. Ed mentioned it before.

They had Mouse Davis helping out at Hawaii. Maybe he or June Junes would like to help out?

Just throwing it out there. Price probably just wants to chill...but he will probably in nearby Lake Coeur d'Alene during fall camp.

Price had 8 running backs on scholarship for a 1 back offense.

He doesn’t know a damn thing about roster management or scholarship allotment.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT