LOL. Probably struck out with Rocky Long, so Leach decided to poach Arnett from Syracuse, who Arnett just agreed to terms with last week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL. Probably struck out with Rocky Long, so Leach decided to poach Arnett from Syracuse, who Arnett just agreed to terms with last week.
LOL. Probably struck out with Rocky Long, so Leach decided to poach Arnett from Syracuse, who Arnett just agreed to terms with last week.
We have no idea yet, but who would you rather have, Dickert or Arnett?
We have no idea yet, but who would you rather have, Dickert or Arnett?
We have no idea yet, but who would you rather have, Dickert or Arnett?
We have no idea yet, but who would you rather have, Dickert or Arnett?
That and the fact that Dickert was responsible for all the effective improvising against certain teams. the HC gave him all the credit.At this point I'd rather have Dickert, and here is why. Both have roughly similar backgrounds in the same league, but there is a big difference. Arnett has always been in Rocky Long's shadow. I'm sure Arnett is good, but it is hard to parse out how much of the SDSU D success was due to Long, and how much due to Arnett. Dickert, on the other hand, has had to stand on his own two feet for a couple of years, and that is an important difference in track record. That does NOT tell us who is the best coach, but it is one indicator that we have for Dickert that we would not have for Arnett. I'll add that Dickert did his work in Wyoming, which is not an easy recruiting destination, as opposed to Arnett doing what he has done in San Diego. All in all, based on what is publicly known at this point, I'd rather have Dickert.
I don't disagree with anything you said, but would add that Dickert also coached for a defensive-minded HC in Craig Bohl. Whether Bohl cast as much of a shadow as Long, I can't say. But both Dickert & Arnett probably benefited from some of the wisdom and experience of their head coaches.At this point I'd rather have Dickert, and here is why. Both have roughly similar backgrounds in the same league, but there is a big difference. Arnett has always been in Rocky Long's shadow. I'm sure Arnett is good, but it is hard to parse out how much of the SDSU D success was due to Long, and how much due to Arnett. Dickert, on the other hand, has had to stand on his own two feet for a couple of years, and that is an important difference in track record. That does NOT tell us who is the best coach, but it is one indicator that we have for Dickert that we would not have for Arnett. I'll add that Dickert did his work in Wyoming, which is not an easy recruiting destination, as opposed to Arnett doing what he has done in San Diego. All in all, based on what is publicly known at this point, I'd rather have Dickert.