Kamala. Huh huh. Blowjobs. Huh huh.
Why you gotta do Butthead like that?
Kamala. Huh huh. Blowjobs. Huh huh.
Hmm… which one is Goober? I’m going with Butthead.
Almost like it wasn’t the best idea to blanket pardon thousands of common criminals 🤷As long as we are tossing around random numbers.....I like 69. Were you 8 before 9?
Thank you so very much for sending us to about:blank. A very useful web site.Almost like it wasn’t the best idea to blanket pardon thousands of common criminals 🤷
Tinfoil hat might be interfering with your signal.Thank you so very much for sending us to about:blank. A very useful web site.
Can't be that. I overnighted my tinfoil hat to AOC.Tinfoil hat might be interfering with your signal.
To summarize, one of your DC tourist buddies got himself shot by the police during a traffic stop already. I’m sure the rest of them are volunteering at food banks and leading church youth groups though.
The TDS is strong in this one.Can't be that. I overnighted my tinfoil hat to AOC.
I don't know any of the Jan 6 gang, and none of them are my buddies. Some of them deserved some jail time, some of them didn't. I saw that the guy was killed, don't know any of the details about how it went down, but I suspect he may have learned a lesson that many others have learned also- It is best for you to calmly do what the police officer tells you to do. Perhaps he misinterpreted Trump's pardon to be more like Hunter got, that he had free reign for any and all crimes for all of his life?
Not a fan of preemptive pardons myself but a pretty useful tool when people want to put fascists in power 🤷Can't be that. I overnighted my tinfoil hat to AOC.
I don't know any of the Jan 6 gang, and none of them are my buddies. Some of them deserved some jail time, some of them didn't. I saw that the guy was killed, don't know any of the details about how it went down, but I suspect he may have learned a lesson that many others have learned also- It is best for you to calmly do what the police officer tells you to do. Perhaps he misinterpreted Trump's pardon to be more like Hunter got, that he had free reign for any and all crimes for all of his life?
It’s an intellectual upgrade for you from the links that you post so yeah, you should be thankful.Thank you so very much for sending us to about:blank. A very useful web site.
Every last one of them deserves to be blindfolded and marched out in front of a firing squad. Or sent to Russia to serve with the North Koreans.Can't be that. I overnighted my tinfoil hat to AOC.
I don't know any of the Jan 6 gang, and none of them are my buddies. Some of them deserved some jail time, some of them didn't. I saw that the guy was killed, don't know any of the details about how it went down, but I suspect he may have learned a lesson that many others have learned also- It is best for you to calmly do what the police officer tells you to do. Perhaps he misinterpreted Trump's pardon to be more like Hunter got, that he had free rein for any and all crimes for all of his life?
You're cute. Wrong, misguided, but cute.The TDS is strong in this one.
That seems just a tad harsh to me. Do you propose the same fate for folks like Hillary Clinton that tried to effect elections with the Steele dossier, Stacy Abrams, and the 51 intel officials that lied about the reality of Hunter's laptop? Keep in mind that surveys showed after the 2020 election that between 13-17% of Biden voters indicated that they would likely have changed their votes if they had known that the laptop was genuine and not Russian disinformation like they had been told. And perhaps the MSM members that suppressed any stories about the laptop should also be taken out and shot? After all, it was their actions that kept the public from being fully educated on two candidates, thus affecting the election.Every last one of them deserves to be blindfolded and marched out in front of a firing squad. Or sent to Russia to serve with the North Koreans.
You tell us stretch, your guy has done both!That seems just a tad harsh to me. Do you propose the same fate for folks like Hillary Clinton that tried to effect elections with the Steele dossier, Stacy Abrams, and the 51 intel officials that lied about the reality of Hunter's laptop? Keep in mind that surveys showed after the 2020 election that between 13-17% of Biden voters indicated that they would likely have changed their votes if they had known that the laptop was genuine and not Russian disinformation like they had been told. And perhaps the MSM members that suppressed any stories about the laptop should also be taken out and shot? After all, it was their actions that kept the public from being fully educated on two candidates, thus affecting the election.
I am curious about one thing- do you think it is worse to complain/protest/riot about an election after it has taken place or is it worse to take underhanded/illegal actions before an election to influence the outcome?
Yes, along with the Biden family. Obviously.Tinfoil hat might be interfering with your signal.
To summarize, one of your DC tourist buddies got himself shot by the police during a traffic stop already. I’m sure the rest of them are volunteering at food banks and leading church youth groups though.
Flexible reasoning there.Not a fan of preemptive pardons myself but a pretty useful tool when people want to put fascists in power 🤷
Catholicism might not be your thing, but Joe did in fact attend church, and rumor has it he knows which end of the Bible is up. Carry on though.Yes, along with the Biden family. Obviously.
Get back to me when Hillary incites a violent overthrow of our government. Until then your false equivalencies are an epic fail.That seems just a tad harsh to me. Do you propose the same fate for folks like Hillary Clinton that tried to effect elections with the Steele dossier, Stacy Abrams, and the 51 intel officials that lied about the reality of Hunter's laptop? Keep in mind that surveys showed after the 2020 election that between 13-17% of Biden voters indicated that they would likely have changed their votes if they had known that the laptop was genuine and not Russian disinformation like they had been told. And perhaps the MSM members that suppressed any stories about the laptop should also be taken out and shot? After all, it was their actions that kept the public from being fully educated on two candidates, thus affecting the election.
I am curious about one thing- do you think it is worse to complain/protest/riot about an election after it has taken place or is it worse to take underhanded/illegal actions before an election to influence the outcome?
Ah, yes…when one takes power they should have free rein to persecute all political adversaries and their families. Never would have imagined this would be your position!Flexible reasoning there.
I’ve heard there’s a name for that… something like “Trump Fealty Syndrome”, or “Trump Fellator Syndrome”, or “Trump duh or der-something or other Syndrome”. Oh cripes, maybe Stetch can help me out here.Ah, yes…when one takes power they should have free rein to persecute all political adversaries and their families. Never would have imagined this would be your position!
Trump won the electoral college and popular vote. He "took power" by democratic process.Ah, yes…when one takes power they should have free rein to persecute all political adversaries and their families. Never would have imagined this would be your position!
Catholicism might not be your thing, but Joe did in fact attend church, and rumor has it he knows which end of the Bible is up. Carry on though.
It is my understanding democracy died on 1/20/25.Trump won the electoral college and popular vote. He "took power" by democratic process.
Actually, I have clearly shown everyone here exactly what TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) 4 or 5 times already, showing the derivation and evolution of the term. I don't feel like wasting my time any more trying to educate those that are either too stubborn or too stupid to understand such a subtle concept and insist on using it exactly opposite of the actual meaning.I’ve heard there’s a name for that… something like “Trump Fealty Syndrome”, or “Trump Fellator Syndrome”, or “Trump duh or der-something or other Syndrome”. Oh cripes, maybe Stetch can help me out here.
So did the Nazis. They never won a majority, but took pluralities in their elections by staging mass rallies and by cozying up to financial & industrial elites.Trump won the electoral college and popular vote. He "took power" by democratic process.
I woulda! Just sayin'Ah, yes…when one takes power they should have free rein to persecute all political adversaries and their families. Never would have imagined this would be your position!
Sounds like you’re upset with the Fed infiltrators.Get back to me when Hillary incites a violent overthrow of our government. Until then your false equivalencies are an epic fail.
Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is showing. Bigly.
Tired and boring.So did the Nazis. They never won a majority, but took pluralities in their elections by staging mass rallies and by cozying up to financial & industrial elites.
Oh boy… 🤦🏼Pope Francis considers it an ‘incoherence’ that President Biden, a Catholic, supports abortion rights
The pope made the comment about the Catholic U.S. president in an interview broadcast July 12.www.catholicnewsagency.com
The only thing you’ve showed us is what it looks like to be balls deep in a cult.Actually, I have clearly shown everyone here exactly what TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) 4 or 5 times already, showing the derivation and evolution of the term. I don't feel like wasting my time any more trying to educate those that are either too stubborn or too stupid to understand such a subtle concept and insist on using it exactly opposite of the actual meaning.
This kinda sounds like a "Couging it" argument, does it not?Actually, I have clearly shown everyone here exactly what TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) 4 or 5 times already, showing the derivation and evolution of the term. I don't feel like wasting my time any more trying to educate those that are either too stubborn or too stupid to understand such a subtle concept and insist on using it exactly opposite of the actual meaning.
He wants to act like head of a corporation - aka the King.Has anyone actually had to read through the executive orders and other documents?
I’ve had to review the funding freeze and the clarifying memo. They’re an interesting contrast. The actual EO is written like lawyers wrote it - at least, once you get past the introduction. Lots of mentions of things like responsibility to the taxpayer, efficiency, the nation’s priorities and well-being, etc.
The clarifying memo was much less polished. Makes me think Donny wrote it himself. Nothing about the nation and the taxpayers, it’s all about ensuring that expenditures align with the president’s priorities, and getting the president’s approval. All funding decisions must be reviewed and approved by a senior member of the president’s team, etc.
Choose your adjective. Impractical would work. Improper or illegal would work in some areas. But really it makes clear that he doesn’t want to be a democratic leader, he wants to be the head of a corporation - a fixed and ultimate authority making all the decisions.
Not really a surprise considering his background and personality - and the way he acted through his first term - but I appreciate how he keeps telling us who he really is, even if a lot of people aren’t listening anymore.
You actually think Trump wrote any of these 😂?Has anyone actually had to read through the executive orders and other documents?
I’ve had to review the funding freeze and the clarifying memo. They’re an interesting contrast. The actual EO is written like lawyers wrote it - at least, once you get past the introduction. Lots of mentions of things like responsibility to the taxpayer, efficiency, the nation’s priorities and well-being, etc.
The clarifying memo was much less polished. Makes me think Donny wrote it himself. Nothing about the nation and the taxpayers, it’s all about ensuring that expenditures align with the president’s priorities, and getting the president’s approval. All funding decisions must be reviewed and approved by a senior member of the president’s team, etc.
Choose your adjective. Impractical would work. Improper or illegal would work in some areas. But really it makes clear that he doesn’t want to be a democratic leader, he wants to be the head of a corporation - a fixed and ultimate authority making all the decisions.
Not really a surprise considering his background and personality - and the way he acted through his first term - but I appreciate how he keeps telling us who he really is, even if a lot of people aren’t listening anymore.
So, by your own admission you made a terrible analogy. Were you saying "elections have consequences" four years ago?So did the Nazis. They never won a majority, but took pluralities in their elections by staging mass rallies and by cozying up to financial & industrial elites.
I doubt Trump is even writing his Tweets or Truths or whatever (at most looking those over and making some edits before he hits send, EDIT TO ADD tells someone to hit send). No way is he actually writing a memo. First, I doubt he has any desire to do that. Second, he's got other things to do. Third, you ever see the dude in front of a laptop?Has anyone actually had to read through the executive orders and other documents?
I’ve had to review the funding freeze and the clarifying memo. They’re an interesting contrast. The actual EO is written like lawyers wrote it - at least, once you get past the introduction. Lots of mentions of things like responsibility to the taxpayer, efficiency, the nation’s priorities and well-being, etc.
The clarifying memo was much less polished. Makes me think Donny wrote it himself. Nothing about the nation and the taxpayers, it’s all about ensuring that expenditures align with the president’s priorities, and getting the president’s approval. All funding decisions must be reviewed and approved by a senior member of the president’s team, etc.
Choose your adjective. Impractical would work. Improper or illegal would work in some areas. But really it makes clear that he doesn’t want to be a democratic leader, he wants to be the head of a corporation - a fixed and ultimate authority making all the decisions.
Not really a surprise considering his background and personality - and the way he acted through his first term - but I appreciate how he keeps telling us who he really is, even if a lot of people aren’t listening anymore.
You can tell that's not true, because whoever wrote them actually knew and understood the lawYes, Trump wrote each and every one of the executive orders personally with Microsoft Word using only the assistance of the little paperclip guy.
You can tell that's not true, because whoever wrote them actually knew and understood the law