Or don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out thread
Feel free to leave pleasantries and well wishes.
Or curse.
Feel free to leave pleasantries and well wishes.
Or curse.
Since I’ve never been divorced I gotta think this is a similar type of relief to when the papers are signed?Or don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out thread
Feel free to leave pleasantries and well wishes.
Or curse.
More like when an abusive spouse gets thrown in cuffs.Since I’ve never been divorced I gotta think this is a similar type of relief to when the papers are signed?
Noted that Loyal is against 69 and women.Schulz will go down, IMHO, as the worst President in history. Worse than Vernon Lane Rawlins.
I worked at WSU under Sam Smith, Rawlins and Floyd. Smith was woefully underappreciated when he retired at 60 after 15 years. He was/is a great guy. Was one of my references for quite a while.
So, Kirk, good F-ing riddance. Still can't believe we hired a 69-year-old to take over.
Where did I mention that Cantwell was a woman? So F-you asshole. My point was that a 69-year-old won't be around very long. 5 years max?Noted that Loyal is against 69 and women.
Didn't expect that.
I agree on Sam Smith. Met him a few times socially and he was a pretty good guy. Really cared deeply about WSU.Schulz will go down, IMHO, as the worst President in history. Worse than Vernon Lane Rawlins.
I worked at WSU under Sam Smith, Rawlins and Floyd. Smith was woefully underappreciated when he retired at 60 after 15 years. He was/is a great guy. Was one of my references for quite a while.
So, Kirk, good F-ing riddance. Still can't believe we hired a 69-year-old to take over.
Correction, Sam Smith was a GREAT guy and still does care deeply for WSU. He would always make it a point to say goodnight to the custodians on his way out. You may not know that he kept an office at WSU West for at least a decade as unpaid President Emeritus and continued to advocate, and probably fundraise, for WSU. I'd say he might still be there, although I believe WSU West closed a few years back. You Wetsiders would know.I agree on Sam Smith. Met him a few times socially and he was a pretty good guy. Really cared deeply about WSU.
WSU is truly inept from my point of view. It starts at the Regents level. Why they hired a 69 year old President, is curious to me.
AboveWith one caveat, Brand X had some positive things to see on the eve of Dr. Schultz's exit:
"His legacy of course will be tied to the downfall of the Pac-12 and the relegation of WSU and OSU. But here in his final days we would be remiss not to mention"
1) the unprecedented fundraising milestones WSU achieved on his watch Whatever, that's part of his job
2) his key role in creating the pending new Pac-12 And that is going so well so far
3) What a first-class guy he was to deal with from our perspective as a news organization. Meh
No mention of the state-of-the-art IPF Which has been in progress for about 20 years now. About F-ing time. And I still want the brick I paid for
Didn't see anything about the retirement on Brand Y
I don't buy your first premise. I understand it, but I don't think it necessarily fails if Larry Scott just goes with a network partner and gets a good TV deal with solid distribution as opposed to wasting tons of money on startup and ongoing costs, all for a lousy product with lousy distribution and no cross-promotion with distributions to schools that missed projections. Just use the LA schools to do a deal with Fox (or ESPN, but Fox loves the LA schools and viewed the Pac-12 as the Big Ten West). Done. Then you might have to deal with USC and UCLA wanting more down the line, but the conference wouldn't necessarily have fallen apart. Larry cared more about empire building and being a media company CEO than doing what made sense for the conference or its member institutions, and the clueless university presidents generally were out to lunch for Larry's entire tenure. Funny thing is that we, and especially the UWs, Oregons, and the like, would have been pissed about having to give the LA schools unequal shares, but if we had known the alternative ....The conference was bound to fail when USC took an equal revenue share with the last tv contract.
WSUs enrollment is dropping like a turd but Uof I next door is at record enrollment. That’s on him.
He was, and is, a chump who cared more about people pleasing and kissing ass than being strategic and doing what it took to fight for the best interests of WSU. He also was, and is, exactly what you describe. Clueless and feckless.I will fondly remember that on the eve of the collapse, with rumors and news stories rampant Schulz, then chairman of the Pac-12 board of directors, gave a speech to our board of regents, the topic of which was how he and WSU planned to lead the Pac-12 into the future, blissfully unaware that everyone was plotting to jump ship the next morning.
Is there a more clear example of someone who was way out of his depth? How could a university president and then Pac-12 chair be so clueless of what was going on around him. Could he have saved the conference? Unlikely. But he should have been aware, and on the phone all day and all night, desperately trying to keep the conference together or, failing that, trying to find us a landing spot.
The Paul Wulff of university presidents.
I concur, the revenue share was just a piece of the puzzle. Scott really screwed us as well. I actually remember reading an article with an interview with George K that said the PAC needed to do be conscious of USCs “concerns” with the revenue model. A couple of weeks later they flew the coop.I don't buy your first premise. I understand it, but I don't think it necessarily fails if Larry Scott just goes with a network partner and gets a good TV deal with solid distribution as opposed to wasting tons of money on startup and ongoing costs, all for a lousy product with lousy distribution and no cross-promotion with distributions to schools that missed projections. Just use the LA schools to do a deal with Fox (or ESPN, but Fox loves the LA schools and viewed the Pac-12 as the Big Ten West). Done. Then you might have to deal with USC and UCLA wanting more down the line, but the conference wouldn't necessarily have fallen apart. Larry cared more about empire building and being a media company CEO than doing what made sense for the conference or its member institutions, and the clueless university presidents generally were out to lunch for Larry's entire tenure. Funny thing is that we, and especially the UWs, Oregons, and the like, would have been pissed about having to give the LA schools unequal shares, but if we had known the alternative ....
Such a aggressive response.Where did I mention that Cantwell was a woman? So F-you asshole. My point was that a 69-year-old won't be around very long. 5 years max?
Now if her first official move is to kick Schulz's wife out of her Tri-Cities job I will be happier.
So the PAC 12 could have easily been saved, even after USC, UCLA left, if the PAC 12 had done what the Big 12 did, had been less stupid, less greedy, less arrogant, less prideful, less stubborn, wasn't clueless under klikoff, idiot university president's.
And Schultz was sooo stupid, moronic, idiotic, clueless. How could he not know what was going on around him? There were even mentally disabled, drug users, homeless, etc, who even knew what was going on, happening because of the news, You Tube, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, social media, rumors, etc. Did Schultz have his head up his ass? Did Schultz live in a CAVE?
He should have known, even street rats knew.
Has another WSU president ever “remote worked” from somewhere else? Seems to me if you’re getting paid that kind of scratch to oversee a university with a home to live in, you better damn well live there. That’s on the board for allowing that. How can you be fully engaged with the university if you’re not even F’ing there.Plummeting enrollment, remote working from Tri-Cities (this blew my mind when I heard that) and the collapse of the P-12 happened on his watch. As someone mentioned above, this guy is now below V Lane Rawlins,WAZZUandsenior golfbe darned.
She’s a bridge. She’s got experience with budget issues and with building research. That’s why she’s here. They’ll get 4-5 years from her, hopefully repair some damage, and then move on to another younger president.I agree on Sam Smith. Met him a few times socially and he was a pretty good guy. Really cared deeply about WSU.
WSU is truly inept from my point of view. It starts at the Regents level. Why they hired a 69 year old President, is curious to me.
I recall Elson Floyd being accused of "living in Seattle" when he was Prez. A bit of a firestorm, and it was complete BS. Floyd lived in the Prez res. I was there a couple of times. WSU had a Seattle condo so the Prez and probably others had a place to land while in Seattle.Has another WSU president ever “remote worked” from somewhere else? Seems to me if you’re getting paid that kind of scratch to oversee a university with a home to live in, you better damn well live there. That’s on the board for allowing that. How can you be fully engaged with the university if you’re not even F’ing there.
When you look at the NCAA and the last 3 cucks who've headed it up, I'd have to agree that KS is highly qualified to lead an ineffective, powerless, emasculated organization.John Wilner of the San Jose paper was a huge supporter of Pres. Schultz. He even stated that Schultzie was well qualified to be president of the NCAA if/when that job came open.
I guess he's one of those guys who's either loved (Brand X and John Wilner) or hated (just about everyone here and Brand Z)