ADVERTISEMENT

OT- Oops, voter fraud is underway

S

Stretch 74

Hall Of Fame
Jan 6, 2003
3,019
1,269
113
Apparently some fine, upstanding citizens in PA didn't get the the memo from WAPO/NYTimes/DNC that there is no such thing as voter fraud. I wonder if voter fraud doesn't exist why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?

https://townhall.com/videos/2024/10...n-underway-in-lancaster-pennsylvania-n2646781

Meanwhile, the Biden/Garland DOJ is suing the state of Virginia for trying to remove people from the voter rolls that have ADMITTED that they are aliens. Now why in the world would they do that? What possible rational explanation is there for suing a state to force them to reinstate people that are not eligible to vote onto the voter rolls? It wouldn't be to allow and encourage people to illegally vote, would it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jiff76
Stretch 74 said:
Apparently some fine, upstanding citizens in PA didn't get the the memo from WAPO/NYTimes/DNC that there is no such thing as voter fraud. I wonder if voter fraud doesn't exist why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?

https://townhall.com/videos/2024/10...n-underway-in-lancaster-pennsylvania-n2646781

Meanwhile, the Biden/Garland DOJ is suing the state of Virginia for trying to remove people from the voter rolls that have ADMITTED that they are aliens. Now why in the world would they do that? What possible rational explanation is there for suing a state to force them to reinstate people that are not eligible to vote onto the voter rolls? It wouldn't be to allow and encourage people to illegally vote, would it?
Click to expand...
NMBRCRNCHR said:
Safest and securest, nothing to see here. Just move along.
Click to expand...
Gee Stretch, I looked this up on CBS News (link below). So applying the existing safeguards, Lancaster officials flagged a bunch of voter REGISTRATION forms that looked odd and MIGHT be fraudulent. They are tracking down the alleged registrants. Culprit appears to canvassers parked outside stores, etc. I ran into one just the other day.

My $5 sez that since the citizens contacted all seem to have interacted with canvassers, the canvassers probably filled out forms that were incomplete and submitted them. Wrong, yes. Stupid if correct, yes. Fraud? Not so much.

Bottom line? NO VOTER FRAUD. Possible/probable ineligible registration applications. Probably a bunch of Trumpers who couldn't fill out a form correctly if it was their grocery list.

 
  • Like
Reactions: longtimecoug and Dave_86
Stretch 74 said:
Apparently some fine, upstanding citizens in PA didn't get the the memo from WAPO/NYTimes/DNC that there is no such thing as voter fraud. I wonder if voter fraud doesn't exist why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?

https://townhall.com/videos/2024/10...n-underway-in-lancaster-pennsylvania-n2646781

Meanwhile, the Biden/Garland DOJ is suing the state of Virginia for trying to remove people from the voter rolls that have ADMITTED that they are aliens. Now why in the world would they do that? What possible rational explanation is there for suing a state to force them to reinstate people that are not eligible to vote onto the voter rolls? It wouldn't be to allow and encourage people to illegally vote, would it?
Click to expand...
Yawn. More whining from Trumpies with no proof to ever back it up. You are constant victims just like your hero.

Maybe see what happens with the votes first before whining about it being rigged.
 
Loyal Coug1 said:
Gee Stretch, I looked this up on CBS News (link below). So applying the existing safeguards, Lancaster officials flagged a bunch of voter REGISTRATION forms that looked odd and MIGHT be fraudulent. They are tracking down the alleged registrants. Culprit appears to canvassers parked outside stores, etc. I ran into one just the other day.

My $5 sez that since the citizens contacted all seem to have interacted with canvassers, the canvassers probably filled out forms that were incomplete and submitted them. Wrong, yes. Stupid if correct, yes. Fraud? Not so much.

Bottom line? NO VOTER FRAUD. Possible/probable ineligible registration applications. Probably a bunch of Trumpers who couldn't fill out a form correctly if it was their grocery list.

Click to expand...
I will just point out to you and 90, it was the District Attorney that specifically stated it WAS fraud. Isn't it a District Attorney's actual job to know what is and what is not fraud?

CBS's job is simply to carry water for the Democrat party, which they do quite well. Like switching Kamalalala's answers to make her sound a little less stupid. No surprise that they would claim that the DA was wrong. Just like they claimed Russian collusion was real and Hunter's laptop was false.

Nice to see though, that you think it is all fine and good for someone to falsely fill out a government form, and say it isn't fraud. How about if I fill out a loan application using your name and claiming your house as collateral for said loan? I could simply say it wasn't fraud at all, I was just confused. No harm, no foul there, too?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jiff76 and HCoug
Stretch 74 said:
I will just point out to you and 90, it was the District Attorney that specifically stated it WAS fraud. Isn't it a District Attorney's actual job to know what is and what is not fraud?

CBS's job is simply to carry water for the Democrat party, which they do quite well. Like switching Kamalalala's answers to make her sound a little less stupid. No surprise that they would claim that the DA was wrong. Just like they claimed Russian collusion was real and Hunter's laptop was false.

Nice to see though, that you think it is all fine and good for someone to falsely fill out a government form, and say it isn't fraud. How about if I fill out a loan application using your name and claiming your house as collateral for said loan? I could simply say it wasn't fraud at all, I was just confused. No harm, no foul there, too?
Click to expand...
Christ you guys are crybabies. I wonder where you learn it from…🤔
 
Coug90 said:
Yawn. More whining from Trumpies with no proof to ever back it up. You are constant victims just like your hero.

Maybe see what happens with the votes first before whining about it being rigged.
Click to expand...
Yeah, like who knew fascists today were such crybabies? Over fake news, no less.
Never heard Benito or Adolf whining back in the day; they sure don’t make ‘em like they used to.
 
WillieThePimp said:
Yeah, like who knew fascists today were such crybabies? Over fake news, no less.
Never heard Benito or Adolf whining back in the day; they sure don’t make ‘em like they used to.
Click to expand...
Lots of people hate Trump. If he gets his ass kicked like he did last time it will be because a lot of people who hated him voted for the D candidate…just like last time. It’s really that simple. They piss and moan and whine because they are reading the tea leaves and know they have a real chance of losing again.
 
Stretch 74 said:
Apparently some fine, upstanding citizens in PA didn't get the the memo from WAPO/NYTimes/DNC that there is no such thing as voter fraud. I wonder if voter fraud doesn't exist why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?

https://townhall.com/videos/2024/10...n-underway-in-lancaster-pennsylvania-n2646781

Meanwhile, the Biden/Garland DOJ is suing the state of Virginia for trying to remove people from the voter rolls that have ADMITTED that they are aliens. Now why in the world would they do that? What possible rational explanation is there for suing a state to force them to reinstate people that are not eligible to vote onto the voter rolls? It wouldn't be to allow and encourage people to illegally vote, would it?
Click to expand...
So if Trump wins is it because of voter fraud ?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Coug90
Coug90 said:
Lots of people hate Trump. If he gets his ass kicked like he did last time it will be because a lot of people who hated him voted for the D candidate…just like last time. It’s really that simple. They piss and moan and whine because they are reading the tea leaves and know they have a real chance of losing again.
Click to expand...
Fear is a great motivator - that’s why this statistical nonissue has been milked to death. No one was talking about this nonsense before Trump brought it up and hammered it mercilessly starting in 2016. Say it enough times and it becomes real… even if it isn’t. Trump knows all too well that his target audience is mostly uneducated nincompoops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KRUSTYtheCOUG
WillieThePimp said:
Fear is a great motivator - that’s why this statistical nonissue has been milked to death. No one was talking about this nonsense before Trump brought it up and hammered it mercilessly starting in 2016. Say it enough times and it becomes real… even if it isn’t. Trump knows all too well that his target audience is mostly uneducated nincompoops.
Click to expand...
True. You gotta have gullible bullshit gobblers like Stretch to eat it up though too. They feed each other.
 
WillieThePimp said:
Funny and sad because he won’t get it. The real answer is that if Trump wins we are truly a nation of idiots and the morally bankrupt.
Click to expand...
Oh the gift that keeps giving. Lord of the Covid Cucks looking for more punishment. Not tired of seeing your wife get ran through yet?
 
CougInSpain said:
Oh the gift that keeps giving. Lord of the Covid Cucks looking for more punishment. Not tired of seeing your wife get ran through yet?
Click to expand...
Another butthurt poop for brains. The better part of you ran down your mama’s leg.

Sorry I hurt your feelings, Nancy.
 
Last edited:
Stretch 74 said:
I will just point out to you and 90, it was the District Attorney that specifically stated it WAS fraud. Isn't it a District Attorney's actual job to know what is and what is not fraud?

CBS's job is simply to carry water for the Democrat party, which they do quite well. Like switching Kamalalala's answers to make her sound a little less stupid. No surprise that they would claim that the DA was wrong. Just like they claimed Russian collusion was real and Hunter's laptop was false.

Nice to see though, that you think it is all fine and good for someone to falsely fill out a government form, and say it isn't fraud. How about if I fill out a loan application using your name and claiming your house as collateral for said loan? I could simply say it wasn't fraud at all, I was just confused. No harm, no foul there, too?
Click to expand...
I said nothing of the sort. What I posted was: My $5 sez that since the citizens contacted all seem to have interacted with canvassers, the canvassers probably filled out forms that were incomplete and submitted them. Wrong, yes. Stupid if correct, yes. Fraud? Not so much.
"all fine and good" does not equal "Wrong, yes". But nice try, Trumpy.

And "Fraud"? OK, potato, pahtato.

Finally - it is not "voter fraud". These people have not voted yet. And per the Election officials: "Our Lancaster County Elections system is secure. Our systems worked," the Board of Elections said in a statement.

The article I linked did omit the important detail that dog and cat DNA was found on some of these registration forms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KRUSTYtheCOUG
CougEd said:
So if Trump wins is it because of voter fraud ?
Click to expand...
I guess we'll just have to wait and see until after he does win, right? One thing I am absolutely sure of though is that after he does win the Dems will be yelling that there was fraud, that he is illegitimate, and that the Russians helped him. Just like they did in 2016 and 2000.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jiff76 and Cougini5591
Loyal Coug1 said:
I said nothing of the sort. What I posted was: My $5 sez that since the citizens contacted all seem to have interacted with canvassers, the canvassers probably filled out forms that were incomplete and submitted them. Wrong, yes. Stupid if correct, yes. Fraud? Not so much.
"all fine and good" does not equal "Wrong, yes". But nice try, Trumpy.

And "Fraud"? OK, potato, pahtato.

Finally - it is not "voter fraud". These people have not voted yet. And per the Election officials: "Our Lancaster County Elections system is secure. Our systems worked," the Board of Elections said in a statement.

The article I linked did omit the important detail that dog and cat DNA was found on some of these registration forms.
Click to expand...
I did take notice of your bolded words in your first response. I also took notice of the next words, "Fraud? Not so much". Now to me, I take that to mean you are denying the existence of fraud, which the DA specifically stated had taken place. Am I wrong, on that? You did NOT mean to deny fraud took place? If so, please explain what that is supposed to mean.

If you liberal fluffers get such tight sphincters over use of the word fraud here, what do you want to call it when some one fills out forms with misrepresentations? With deception? With false information? When you fill out a form and sign it using someone else's name and/or address? Misinformation? Disinformation? Bullshit?

Jeez, I am getting so confused here! I have been preached to and lectured by the left for the past 4 years about the dangers of misinformation and disinformation and here you guys go trying to say it is no big deal.

Hypocrisy on parade once again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: HCoug
Stretch 74 said:
I did take notice of your bolded words in your first response. I also took notice of the next words, "Fraud? Not so much". Now to me, I take that to mean you are denying the existence of fraud, which the DA specifically stated had taken place. Am I wrong, on that? You did NOT mean to deny fraud took place? If so, please explain what that is supposed to mean.

If you liberal fluffers get such tight sphincters over use of the word fraud here, what do you want to call it when some one fills out forms with misrepresentations? With deception? With false information? When you fill out a form and sign it using someone else's name and/or address? Misinformation? Disinformation? Bullshit?

Jeez, I am getting so confused here! I have been preached to and lectured by the left for the past 4 years about the dangers of misinformation and disinformation and here you guys go trying to say it is no big deal.

Hypocrisy on parade once again!
Click to expand...
Give it a rest Stretch. Per the DA:
"In the legitimate registrations, people listed on those applications confirmed to detectives that they had registered to vote with a canvasser, Adams said."

AND, you are a liar. Or at least a misleader. We'll go with that. Surpise. The DA did NOT say what you posted: "why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?"

What the DA said was that 60% of the ones they looked at were fraudulent. Out of the 2,500. Which probably means they looked through them and some stood out as looking odd. Get your facts straight.

And frankly, what kind of dipshit would give out their information to a canvasser in the first place? Educated liberals and moderates, or semi-toothless Trump lovers? And which group would have been more likely to have already been registered? Food for thought - think about it as you are eating your neighbor's dog.

Finally, don't call me a liberal fluffer. F-you. I already voted, and I voted for more R's than D's. Including Dan Newhouse, one of the two remaining congresspersons that voted to impeach your POS candidate that thinks that my United States has become a garbage can.
 
Stretch 74 said:
I guess we'll just have to wait and see until after he does win, right? One thing I am absolutely sure of though is that after he does win the Dems will be yelling that there was fraud, that he is illegitimate, and that the Russians helped him. Just like they did in 2016 and 2000.
Click to expand...
Not sure about yelling fraud, but Russia has been trying to get him in office for years cuz his fat compromised ass in office weakens the U.S. and strengthens Russia. Not really that hard to understand.
 
Coug90 said:
Not sure about yelling fraud, but Russia has been trying to get him in office for years cuz his fat compromised ass in office weakens the U.S. and strengthens Russia. Not really that hard to understand.
Click to expand...
Unless you live in Northern Idaho................ :)
 
Stretch 74 said:
Apparently some fine, upstanding citizens in PA didn't get the the memo from WAPO/NYTimes/DNC that there is no such thing as voter fraud. I wonder if voter fraud doesn't exist why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?

https://townhall.com/videos/2024/10...n-underway-in-lancaster-pennsylvania-n2646781

Meanwhile, the Biden/Garland DOJ is suing the state of Virginia for trying to remove people from the voter rolls that have ADMITTED that they are aliens. Now why in the world would they do that? What possible rational explanation is there for suing a state to force them to reinstate people that are not eligible to vote onto the voter rolls? It wouldn't be to allow and encourage people to illegally vote, would it?
Click to expand...
bullshit
 
Voter fraud happens, but it is primarily committed by republican. The phoney "electors" scam "you know the people who actually
elect the president" is the most obvious example. Republican are so stupid, they just don't think their fraud actually counts.
 
Cougsocal said:
Voter fraud happens, but it is primarily committed by republican. The phoney "electors" scam "you know the people who actually
elect the president" is the most obvious example. Republican are so stupid, they just don't think their fraud actually counts.
Click to expand...
Of course it “happens”. There were 150 million people who voted in the last election. You’re not going to have that volume of anything without a handful of people trying to cheat. And yes, most of the one-offs who got caught were Rs. Every claim of mass voter fraud has been debunked and thrown out of court.

What you have left over is crybaby fanboys who are complaining about the refs not calling holding when their team lost by 40 points, because that’s what their “coach” does constantly because he’s too much of a dumbass to come up with a solid game-plan.
 
Did you see that Joe Rogan and Trump talked yesterday?

Did you notice it lasted for Three hours? That it wasn’t scripted? No teleprompters, no notes. No cackles.

Did you watch it with your own eyes? Use your own Intelligence? Use your own critical thinking skills crafted at Washington State University?

-OR-

Did you ignore it? Perhaps you Refuse to watch it, perhaps you’re afraid to watch it, instead surrendering to the influence of others who comfort you rather than render your own opinions.

100 million combined views.

Why is Kamala hiding? (Why is she not in the Situation Room guiding the Iran/Isreal escalation?)

I’d love to see Kamala bury Rogan for three straight hours unscripted, without notes. I’m told she has superior intelligence, instincts and moral authority to set the record straight.

He offered, she declined. Why?

You wanted politics on a football board. You ignore all the football related posts. What changed @Cougsocal?
 
Loyal Coug1 said:
Give it a rest Stretch. Per the DA:
"In the legitimate registrations, people listed on those applications confirmed to detectives that they had registered to vote with a canvasser, Adams said."

AND, you are a liar. Or at least a misleader. We'll go with that. Surpise. The DA did NOT say what you posted: "why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?"

What the DA said was that 60% of the ones they looked at were fraudulent. Out of the 2,500. Which probably means they looked through them and some stood out as looking odd. Get your facts straight.

And frankly, what kind of dipshit would give out their information to a canvasser in the first place? Educated liberals and moderates, or semi-toothless Trump lovers? And which group would have been more likely to have already been registered? Food for thought - think about it as you are eating your neighbor's dog.

Finally, don't call me a liberal fluffer. F-you. I already voted, and I voted for more R's than D's. Including Dan Newhouse, one of the two remaining congresspersons that voted to impeach your POS candidate that thinks that my United States has become a garbage can.
Click to expand...
Lots of words to proclaim your love for Kamala Harris, Open boarders and WWIII
 
Stretch 74 said:
I did take notice of your bolded words in your first response. I also took notice of the next words, "Fraud? Not so much". Now to me, I take that to mean you are denying the existence of fraud, which the DA specifically stated had taken place. Am I wrong, on that? You did NOT mean to deny fraud took place? If so, please explain what that is supposed to mean.

If you liberal fluffers get such tight sphincters over use of the word fraud here, what do you want to call it when some one fills out forms with misrepresentations? With deception? With false information? When you fill out a form and sign it using someone else's name and/or address? Misinformation? Disinformation? Bullshit?

Jeez, I am getting so confused here! I have been preached to and lectured by the left for the past 4 years about the dangers of misinformation and disinformation and here you guys go trying to say it is no big deal.

Hypocrisy on parade once again!
Click to expand...
“loyal”Coug follows a specific pattern.

Rather than address any issue on its face, he lists a corporate news service whose editors approved a different news service, with a separate set of editors telling you what was said and what the approved narrative is regarding what you are allowed to believe.

Watch for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stretch 74
Cougsocal said:
Voter fraud happens, but it is primarily committed by republican. The phoney "electors" scam "you know the people who actually
elect the president" is the most obvious example. Republican are so stupid, they just don't think their fraud actually counts.
Click to expand...
If voter fraud happens and is primarily a Republican construct, certainty the Democratic Party had ample opportunity to demand paper ballots and voter ID to put a clamp on it, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UberCougars
It continues to baffle me why the majority of voters continue to argue about democrat v. Republican. Neither is a good option. Neither is good for the country. And, neither cares.

Choose a different option. Stop voting D/R.

There are 10 presidential tickets in the Washington state ballot. Most of them have platforms that are more inviting than either Trump or Harris. Millions of people want a third option, but fail to recognize that the only reason we don’t have one is that we’re not picking them.

After doing my research, I can’t say that I agree top to bottom with any of the 10. In fact, every one of them has at least one thing that I completely disagree with. But I picked one - one that doesn’t have a D or R - and my ballot is already at the courthouse.

FWIW, my overall candidate votes leaned slightly R, but only because Washington’s idiotic election system doesn’t actually give voters choices. If I could, I’d never vote for a candidate from either party. And, my votes on the issues went right down the middle - 2 no, 2 yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggsCoug
95coug said:
It continues to baffle me why the majority of voters continue to argue about democrat v. Republican. Neither is a good option. Neither is good for the country. And, neither cares.

Choose a different option. Stop voting D/R.

There are 10 presidential tickets in the Washington state ballot. Most of them have platforms that are more inviting than either Trump or Harris. Millions of people want a third option, but fail to recognize that the only reason we don’t have one is that we’re not picking them.

After doing my research, I can’t say that I agree top to bottom with any of the 10. In fact, every one of them has at least one thing that I completely disagree with. But I picked one - one that doesn’t have a D or R - and my ballot is already at the courthouse.

FWIW, my overall candidate votes leaned slightly R, but only because Washington’s idiotic election system doesn’t actually give voters choices. If I could, I’d never vote for a candidate from either party. And, my votes on the issues went right down the middle - 2 no, 2 yes.
Click to expand...
Anyone in the middle should absolutely vote R down ballot in WA. Things have swung ridiculously far L and course correction is needed.

This presidential election isn’t about R vs D or L vs R. It’s about a clear threat to democracy vs a bridge to the next election where that threat is finally expunged. I’m not excited about Harris by any means but I’m not casting a vote for Russia and our adversaries.
 
Coug90 said:
Anyone in the middle should absolutely vote R down ballot in WA. Things have swung ridiculously far L and course correction is needed.

This presidential election isn’t about R vs D or L vs R. It’s about a clear threat to democracy vs a bridge to the next election where that threat is finally expunged. I’m not excited about Harris by any means but I’m not casting a vote for Russia and our adversaries.
Click to expand...
Yeah that is why I voted for Reichart, who sadly looks like he will lose the election. Another pencil-necked liberal lawyer is not what we need in Washington State. The shit laws that have been passed are exhibited via the 4 initiatives on the ballot seeking to overturn crappy laws and rules. And the lie-filled ads opposing at least one of them (long-term care) are pathetic. We will tax your paycheck until you die, you don't qualify for this coverage that you are paying for for years, and the maximum benefit is (from memory here) somewhere around a max of $36,000. Lifetime. How far does that get you? Not very.

Anyway, I digress. A Republican Governor, which I don't think we've had since 3 term Dan Evans, is just the balance that we need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jiff76
Richert was set to lose the GOP endorsement from the Washington GOP convention and withdrew his name from the ballot.

Reichert, without the support and endorsement from his own party convention, ran against the party endorsed GOP candidate to ensure victory for the Dem by splitting the vote. You sure picked a winner, “loyal”

Also “loyal”

CBS news: here’s what you need to know about what was said, 😆

 
Last edited:
Loyal Coug1 said:
Give it a rest Stretch. Per the DA:
"In the legitimate registrations, people listed on those applications confirmed to detectives that they had registered to vote with a canvasser, Adams said."

AND, you are a liar. Or at least a misleader. We'll go with that. Surpise. The DA did NOT say what you posted: "why the District Attorney is saying they found 60% of a batch of registrations (~2500) were fraudulent?"

What the DA said was that 60% of the ones they looked at were fraudulent. Out of the 2,500. Which probably means they looked through them and some stood out as looking odd. Get your facts straight.

And frankly, what kind of dipshit would give out their information to a canvasser in the first place? Educated liberals and moderates, or semi-toothless Trump lovers? And which group would have been more likely to have already been registered? Food for thought - think about it as you are eating your neighbor's dog.

Finally, don't call me a liberal fluffer. F-you. I already voted, and I voted for more R's than D's. Including Dan Newhouse, one of the two remaining congresspersons that voted to impeach your POS candidate that thinks that my United States has become a garbage can.
Click to expand...
My apologies if I slightly misstated what she said, but it is likely to be accurate when they have finished their investigation, as the ratio of fraudulent to legitimate registrations is likely to continue. And take note that the DA did NOT say they looked odd, she stated they were FRAUDULENT! Just filling out the forms with false information is committing an act of fraud, it doesn't require an actual vote.

You guys are grasping at straws trying to justify and twist acts of fraud into something of innocence. You know, I have a good friend that is pretty much like you. He claims he isn't a liberal, yet he seems to come down on the liberal side of the issue every single time. Kinda funny how that happens. Makes one wonder why someone doesn't want to be associated with the liberal term when they always seem to argue for the liberal view.
 
Coug90 said:
Not sure about yelling fraud, but Russia has been trying to get him in office for years cuz his fat compromised ass in office weakens the U.S. and strengthens Russia. Not really that hard to understand.
Click to expand...
You are correct in that it really is pretty easy to understand. So why don't you understand it then?

Remember, Putin invaded other countries under BOTH Obama and Biden and stayed home under Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cougini5591
Stretch 74 said:
You are correct in that it really is pretty easy to understand. So why don't you understand it then?

Remember, Putin invaded other countries under BOTH Obama and Biden and stayed home under Trump.
Click to expand...
North Korea didn’t send 10,000 troops to Russia to fight in Ukraine under Trump, either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M

OT POLITICAL THREAD(Jan 6 riots, etc)

Replies
365
Views
15K
The Cougar Lair
KRUSTYtheCOUG
K
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back