ADVERTISEMENT

OT- Oops, voter fraud is underway

You are correct in that it really is pretty easy to understand. So why don't you understand it then?

Remember, Putin invaded other countries under BOTH Obama and Biden and stayed home under Trump.
Trumps actions and words in Helsinki was all someone needed to see who isn’t deep in the cult. Putin owns his ass- it was the most disgraceful showing by a U.S. president on a global stage, perhaps ever. Putin wasn’t going to need a massive invasion had Trump won a second term, Trump would have handed him the entire Eastern Block. Why does Putin own him? Who TF knows, but it’s not hard to see if you have paid any attention. A vote for Trump is a vote for Russia. But keep calling yourself a patriot!
 
Anyone in the middle should absolutely vote R down ballot in WA. Things have swung ridiculously far L and course correction is needed.

This presidential election isn’t about R vs D or L vs R. It’s about a clear threat to democracy vs a bridge to the next election where that threat is finally expunged. I’m not excited about Harris by any means but I’m not casting a vote for Russia and our adversaries.

Yeah that is why I voted for Reichart, who sadly looks like he will lose the election. Another pencil-necked liberal lawyer is not what we need in Washington State. The shit laws that have been passed are exhibited via the 4 initiatives on the ballot seeking to overturn crappy laws and rules. And the lie-filled ads opposing at least one of them (long-term care) are pathetic. We will tax your paycheck until you die, you don't qualify for this coverage that you are paying for for years, and the maximum benefit is (from memory here) somewhere around a max of $36,000. Lifetime. How far does that get you? Not very.

Anyway, I digress. A Republican Governor, which I don't think we've had since 3 term Dan Evans, is just the balance that we need.
No, the republicans as a whole have moved too far to the right in response to the dems moving left. And now they’re undermining their own party candidates who aren’t republican enough. The “RINO” label is another symptom of the extremism and absolutism that pervades both parties, and shows the attitude that if you deviate from the party line at all (which currently means if you don’t absolutely agree with the Donald) then you’re an enemy. Where I vote for republicans, I vote for the ones who have the balls to break with Trump.

I voted for Reichert too, and I’m still holding out hope that he’ll win. Ferguson is way too left, and a tremendous liar. Can’t believe that anyone can buy him as a “tough on crime” candidate, when he’s pretty much single-handedly responsible for removing judgement and authority from law enforcement, and causing massive numbers of cops to retire or quit. I don’t know any that are voting for him. I also believe that he’s been the de facto governor for a couple of years. I don’t know if any of you have seen Inslee in person during this last term, but he makes Biden look pretty sharp. Actually, maybe that was true before this last term too.
 
Richert was set to lose the GOP endorsement from the Washington GOP convention and withdrew his name from the ballot.

Reichert, without the support and endorsement from his own party convention, ran against the party endorsed GOP candidate to ensure victory for the Dem by splitting the vote. You sure picked a winner, “loyal”

Also “loyal”

CBS news: here’s what you need to know about what was said, 😆

Actually, the state GOP wasn’t going to endorse anyone at all once they discovered that their favored candidate was deceitful and their other one (who had better voter support) wouldn’t toe the line. Then the liar’s pals among delegates got out their torches and pitchforks and insisted they endorse him.

The only reason Reichert wouldnt have gotten the endorsement was party internal politics. He’s the only republican candidate who had a chance of winning, and has the best chance of any since Dino Rossi.
 
Actually, the state GOP wasn’t going to endorse anyone at all once they discovered that their favored candidate was deceitful and their other one (who had better voter support) wouldn’t toe the line. Then the liar’s pals among delegates got out their torches and pitchforks and insisted they endorse him.

The only reason Reichert wouldnt have gotten the endorsement was party internal politics. He’s the only republican candidate who had a chance of winning, and has the best chance of any since Dino Rossi.
So Reichert had no ground game going into the GOP convention post of the day.

Got it.
 
My apologies if I slightly misstated what she said, but it is likely to be accurate when they have finished their investigation, as the ratio of fraudulent to legitimate registrations is likely to continue. And take note that the DA did NOT say they looked odd, she stated they were FRAUDULENT! Just filling out the forms with false information is committing an act of fraud, it doesn't require an actual vote.

You guys are grasping at straws trying to justify and twist acts of fraud into something of innocence. You know, I have a good friend that is pretty much like you. He claims he isn't a liberal, yet he seems to come down on the liberal side of the issue every single time. Kinda funny how that happens. Makes one wonder why someone doesn't want to be associated with the liberal term when they always seem to argue for the liberal view.
Ok, OK. I agree that there were some FRAUDULENT voter registrations submitted in Lancaster. That were quickly and effectively identified by the election authorities and the DA. Proving that the system is safe. No one, including me, is justifying acts of fraud. And your assertion that the "liberal view" is that fraud is OK is ridiculous. Despite the fact that liberals called Georgia's Secretary of State last election and urged him to "find" 11,000 votes. Oh wait that was Trump.

Are we done with this yet?
 
If voter fraud happens and is primarily a Republican construct, certainty the Democratic Party had ample opportunity to demand paper ballots and voter ID to put a clamp on it, right?
When Panama Juan votes its inconsequential and isolated. When you sign an oath that you are a rightful elector, one of only 538, when you aren't, supported by your state republican party, that if fraud that undermines the fundamental democratic process. The fraud was on paper, with proof of ID.

Show us proof of wide spread democratic voter fraud or STFU. Just because you are dumb enough to parrot the non-sense, rejected by Trump's own AG, doesn't make it a valid concern, that requires evidence, which there is none, 0-61 by last count in court.
 
When Panama Juan votes its inconsequential and isolated. When you sign an oath that you are a rightful elector, one of only 538, when you aren't, supported by your state republican party, that if fraud that undermines the fundamental democratic process. The fraud was on paper, with proof of ID.

Show us proof of wide spread democratic voter fraud or STFU. Just because you are dumb enough to parrot the non-sense, rejected by Trump's own AG, doesn't make it a valid concern, that requires evidence, which there is none, 0-61 by last count in court.
But at 7:31 am this morning you said voter fraud was perpetrated by Republicans.

But now YOU want proof of voter fraud?
. Don’t you want to solve even the perception of fraudulent activity through proper controls?

Do you lock the cash drawer at night or just work on the honor system until there’s evidence money is missing?
 
Last edited:
Ok, OK. I agree that there were some FRAUDULENT voter registrations submitted in Lancaster. That were quickly and effectively identified by the election authorities and the DA. Proving that the system is safe. No one, including me, is justifying acts of fraud. And your assertion that the "liberal view" is that fraud is OK is ridiculous. Despite the fact that liberals called Georgia's Secretary of State last election and urged him to "find" 11,000 votes. Oh wait that was Trump.

Are we done with this yet?
According to stretch that never happened. Cuz you know eyes and ears…lalalalala…he was just kidding!…or whatever other bullshit excuses they can come up with for him
 
That’s cute. What makes you think I’m a Biden or Harris supporter? And why, apparently, do cult members think everyone else must belong to a cult too?
Well, considering your posts….

So, you support someone that has zero chance of winning.
 
Not Trump. You’re free to frame the world as you see fit but you can’t frame the world for me - I do not view it from the same perspective that you do.
Gee, who would have guessed that. Asking who you do support is not framing the world for you.
 
Gee, who would have guessed that. Asking who you do support is not framing the world for you.
His answer was valid I’m not sure why you can’t accept it. Pretty clear he supports whoever is opposing Trump. Like yesterday for example, I supported Indiana, while every other week of the college football season I don’t even know who Indiana is playing.
 
His answer was valid I’m not sure why you can’t accept it. Pretty clear he supports whoever is opposing Trump. Like yesterday for example, I supported Indiana, while every other week of the college football season I don’t even know who Indiana is playing.
Oh he gets it. He argues for the sake of arguing.
 
His answer was valid I’m not sure why you can’t accept it. Pretty clear he supports whoever is opposing Trump. Like yesterday for example, I supported Indiana, while every other week of the college football season I don’t even know who Indiana is playing.
Well, Harris is opposing Trump and Willie does not seem to support her. Or maybe he does and doesn’t want to admit it. Or maybe he’s a Russian bot.
 
Well, Harris is opposing Trump and Willie does not seem to support her. Or maybe he does and doesn’t want to admit it. Or maybe he’s a Russian bot.
I get help you out D Blithers... he supports democracy, not a candidate who would openly confess wanting to use his military against his opponents or those who dosagree with him. I take it you support Trump wanting to fire Jack Smith for doing his job...

If that means voting for Harris because she supports democracy then that is what he supports .
 
Ok, OK. I agree that there were some FRAUDULENT voter registrations submitted in Lancaster. That were quickly and effectively identified by the election authorities and the DA. Proving that the system is safe. No one, including me, is justifying acts of fraud. And your assertion that the "liberal view" is that fraud is OK is ridiculous. Despite the fact that liberals called Georgia's Secretary of State last election and urged him to "find" 11,000 votes. Oh wait that was Trump.

Are we done with this yet?
If fraud is not acceptable to the left, then please explain why they keep fighting against requiring picture ID to vote? Their stupid claim that it is racist and suppresses the black vote has been blown out of the water in Georgia (remember Jim Crow on steroids?), yet they still fight against ID requirements. Why is that? And while you are at it, perhaps you can also provide a rational excuse for why the left also pushes to allow aliens (illegal and otherwise) to vote?
 
I get help you out D Blithers... he supports democracy, not a candidate who would openly confess wanting to use his military against his opponents or those who dosagree with him. I take it you support Trump wanting to fire Jack Smith for doing his job...

If that means voting for Harris because she supports democracy then that is what he supports .
Democracy like Pelosi knee capping the sitting president and inserting Harris? Or do you mean democracy like the administration telling Facebook to quell dissent?

Willie is a grown up. He/she/they doesn’t need your broken English, fourth grade reading level, MSNBC inspired help.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: acgcoug and HCoug
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT