I think Biden should be in a home with care attendants. But, not my decision.
I think it’s pretty clear to everyone by now that Biden isn’t running himself let alone the country.
Tastiest dog breed thread - poll coming
- Thread starter Loyal Coug1
- Start date
I think it’s pretty clear to everyone by now that Biden isn’t running himself let alone the country.
I don't have a problem with either party, but I would have a problem if this American treasure was outlawed.
Simply can't beat an ice-cold glass of Red-Flavored Kool-Aid on a warm summer day
But you are . You just hide under "state decision"
My wife had a miscarriage and if todays laws where in affect she could not have her medical procedure of a D and C ... which is also the procedure to abort a fetus.
No Presidents don't write their own press releases . They authorize it but don't "write" it.
You think Trump "wrote" the first 30 minutes of his RNC speech? Is he not running his campaign? Who wrote the speech, they must be running the country .
😆
Good one!
But nah, Bleeder ... I truly am uninterested in politics at this point of my life.
I've always called it "Red Kool-Aid" because I have no idea it's stawberry-flavored or cherry-flavored or whatever
Last edited:
A
anon_1nb5kgc7kwlls
Guest
I already said, "safe and effective" which it is neither.
I don't care that you are vaccinated. I care that they lied on the news to the American people when they have advertisements on that same channel from Pfizer. Of course they are biased as ****.
how can this crazy lady keep making up shit?
https://x.com/lauraloomer/status/1815453064196960711?s=46
https://x.com/lauraloomer/status/1815453064196960711?s=46
No not hypothetical, look at Ohio and Louisiana's law. A kid who is raped has to keep the fetus? Doesnt sound like her body her choice to me .
I've got to say that I appreciate the audacity of the current GOP. That they feel empowered to say that the Democrats don't have a right to pick a new candidate when the prior candidate has dropped out of the race is just really unbelievable. The Democrats can't pick a candidate that didn't win their primary in each state? By their logic, would the GOP have been unable to replace Trump on the ballot if the assassin had been successful 9 days ago? The utter bullsh!t and hypocrisy of the GOP never, ever stops.
MSN
www.msn.com
So you don't know . Safe and effective . It went through the same scrutiny a cancer drug would go through and data showed it was effective in preventing covid and those 10% who got covid got mild symptoms.
I think I've heard a comedy bit or someone from the south mentioning that Kool-aid doesn't have flavors, only colors. If you say "purple kool-aid" everyone knows what you mean.
FWIW, I was more of a green kool-aid guy myself.
It isn't a stretch to think at 81 Covid getting him...
But remember it was reported Trump was fine, then rushed off to the hospital, and if he wasn't Trump and got the medical care he did he would have been dead.
Everyone seems to forget this little detail. Dude disappeared and when he reappeared he sounded like he was on deaths door. He received the world’s best care (Trumpers can believe this included a cocktail of Diet Coke, Ivermectin, and Goya beans) and seemed to narrowly escape death. But yeah, it’s still a Hoax!
Technically she’s not. We are all dying, reporting that an 81 year old is about to die isn’t much of a reach. Problem is she’s probably off by 5 or 10 years but none of you clowns will call this crackpot out on her BS so she’ll keep flinging it at you.
Hypocrisy? It is on steroids here with the Dems. They rolled the dice that they could lie and lie and lie and lie that Joe was just fine and dandy and they could drag his saggy old man ass over the electoral finish line. And why did they want to do that? Well, obviously it was to stay in power, but what they kept saying was that they needed to save "our democracy", either being ignorant, stupid, or lying that it is actually "our republic", not our democracy. Putting that aside, after beating their drums day and night for years about saving democracy they then pull that old smoke filled back room maneuver and ignored the person that 14,000,000 Democrats voted for in order to anoint the person that the party elites wanted at the top of the ballot. Please explain how that sneaky little maneuver is in any way, shape, or form democratic.
As for your hypothetical scenario, I don't know what would be legal and/or moral. Of course there is a huge difference in the two situations, in that one candidate would be dead and the other is not dead, and according to his party is still able to act as president. Are there rules already in place for such a contingency? Are they R party rules or FEC rules? Would replacing a dead candidate with a live one be hypocrisy? I hardly think so. Would the situation take place before or after the various state deadlines for submitting the names on the ticket? What happens if Trump is shot again and killed right before the election yet still wins 270+ electoral votes? Sticky situations, but at this point in the election cycle the Democrat party is far ahead in the hypocrisy contest as they appear to be lagging in the actual election.
While we are dealing with ballot hypocrisy, how is it democratic for various dems in different states to try to eliminate Trump from being on the ballot in the first place? Hell of a lot of undemocratic hypocrisy on display there.
A
anon_1nb5kgc7kwlls
Guest
Not entirely: Justin B has been inoculated by CouginSpain in the Ho Chi Minh.
Last edited:
Cause he tried to overthrow an election through fake electors.
But the courts send they could not do it . It was the way the AG understood the law in Colorado.
She was probably right but glad he is on the ballot .
Last edited:
Well played I love these. There was one going around a while ago that was about the apple cup and it was funny AF.
Firstly, political parties can choose their candidates any way they like. THAT process isn't legally bound by any adherence to state or federal constitutional election laws.
Secondly, if it makes you feel better to say "republic" rather than "democracy" because you are a republican...whatever works for you. Technically we are a representative democratic republic. It really makes no difference what single word you choose to use to describe something and a process that we all know and agree to (except trump - the guy you support who doesn't want to accept the rules that this, either "republic" or "democracy" has been playing by for a couple hundred years.
Thirdly, Biden is certainly fine enough to do the job of president. The problem arose that the public PERCEPTION was that he both wasn't and WAS slipping and WOULD continue to decline. All of that changed the calculus going forward. Reasonable.
The reason the DNC backed him is because it is virtually unprecedented to not go with the current president in the next election. I think only Rutherford B. Hayes or Chester Arthur faced that delimma, and Arthur died shortly after the election anyway.
This BS position being taken by some on your team that there could be legal issues with changing the candidate this late really just reveals the concern over there that things have shifted.
Sweet fancy moses, the dems haven't even had their convention yet. You know the place where presidential hopeful announce their running mate.
You should have hoped (and it appears you do) that Biden had stayed in. I hoped for this 2 weeks ago in another thread so my optimism has increased five fold. Taihtsat
A
anon_1nb5kgc7kwlls
Guest
But you’re comfortable with voters telling people what medical care they should or should not seek?
If it’s accepted as medical care - and I’m not sure what else it would be - the. It should be up to the individual. Same as any other medical care.
Here’s another: I know someone whose fetus had triploidy - a defect with an extra set of chromosomes. Massive developmental defects in utero - cardiac, neurological, respiratory, digestive - basically every system was malformed. It was basically a fluke that the pregnancy had not self-terminated in the first few weeks, she had made it to 20 weeks. Zero possibility of survival. Under the rules in many states now, she would be forced to carry it to term.
So they knew that back before the primaries? No they did not, and it also does not disqualify him from federal office. And that is not for a state court to decide anyway.
FWIW, neither party really pays any attention to the primaries, and never really have. Republicans don’t even do one in Washington, and it doesn’t carry much weight with democrats. They’re little more than a chance for state voters to buy off on what the party has already decided. They’re not officially part of the election process, they’re more like club policy. There’s not really any reason that a change in candidates before the convention should be blocked. I’m not even sure a change after the convention could be blocked.
This goes back a long way, but if I remember my history right, Teddy Roosevelt failed to get the party nomination, and then just formed a new party and ran anyway.
That right there in bold red is all we know about your post.....everything is else is just word salad bullsh!t. You'll twist yourself into knots finding excuses for why it's different.
EDIT
So after just feeding my little canine buddy I stopped going through the other room where FNC was on. Laura Ingraham mentioned that the attorney she was talking to had donated $1,000,000 to the Biden campaign, and he would not donate anything to the Harris campaign because he feels she cannot win. He said if the R's could pick who to run against the top picks would be Harris or Newsome, because folks like Shapiro, Manchin, KY gov, Whitmer would all be much tougher to go against. I found that view interesting.
The next guest she brought on was the president of the FEC. He said that they have a specific process set up for dealing with situations where a candidate drops out, and the typical situation would require the donations to be returned to the donors. If the campaign wanted to do it, they could file for an exception/appeal and get an expedited ruling from the FEC in about 20 days. He said nobody from either Biden campaign or Harris campaign reached out to the FEC to inquire about what they were allowed to do, and that they just changed the title on the account. Said there was surely going to be lawsuits due to those actions, and he clearly gave the impression that what was done was illegal.
So who here is surprised by those actions by the Dems? Not me. As always, for the Dems the ends ALWAYS justify the means.
Last edited:
Got it. We'll put you down in the column for those that don't don't give a damn if the laws and rules are followed as long as it negatively affects Donald Trump.
It is still obvious that you need some excellent therapy for your TDS.
So the timing of his convictions is what keeps him eligible? Got it. So theoretically as long as it’s beyond the primaries he could do anything he wanted to, anywhere, and he should be included on every state ballot? He could kill and eat a person like the late, great, Hannibal Lector, in say…Pennsylvania and still should be on their ballot because it happened after the primaries?
Neither one of them are going to be left off of any state ballot nor should they be. It’s just funny to see you cultists twist yourself into knots on why the Dem candidate shouldn’t be allowed on an ballot and why Trump should. Of course some right winged ass hats are also going to waste government time and resources that their constituents will have to pay for arguing such, because they are pandering to people like you.
You really need to pay attention and try to use a bit of reading comprehension. I never said someone should not be allowed on the Dem ballot, I said the way it was done was hypocritical. There IS a difference.
That first paragraph is just stupid.
It has been reported that Biden has $90 million or so in his campaign. If that money is illegally reallocated to Harris and used for advertising against Trump/for Harris, don't you think that would have a negative effect on Trump?
One word... no.
She just raised 80 million in one day.
What if Biden had mini strokes he didnt know he had just before the debate or his heart wasn't pumping enough oxygen but didnt manifest itself until the debate... because of physical reasons they had to have another candidate , you would be ok with that ?
Taking on your highlighted responses. I'll concede that specific term isn't widely known or used. We ARE, however a representative democracy. Do you quibble with that? Are you saying we don't qualify in any way as a democracy? You definitely did hit the hypocrisy point, but you also implied they were doing something undemocratic by ignoring the 14 million voters. My point was that they can make their own rules.
Yes I do think Biden can be president because he IS and has been. No argument that he is in decline. But he isn't in a state of dementia. He's old. He looks old, he acts old, he sounds old. I and a majority of dems saw him in action in that debate and came to the reality that, even if he won and can do the job currently he wouldn't be able to in 2 or 3 yrs. That image was impacting his electability. The party discovered this, saw the writing on the wall and pulled the plug. That was the smartest thing they could do at this time.
As for precedent, OF COURSE they want to retain power. You say that as if you're shocked a party would do that when you give full support to a party that deprived a sitting president a supreme court nomination for an arbitrary and completely fabricated reason. And you also support the guy that tried to overturn elections in several states by attempting to have fake electors appointed, organized and encouraged a riot that interrupted a constitutional proceeding and continually pushes the lie that the election was stolen. All just to desperately hold onto power.
We agree that Biden wouldhave continued to stumble both verbally and probs physically (apparently he has a neuropathy that affects his walking). The polls I've seen actually show her doing BETTER than Biden.
Biden was also a failed candidate (several times) before Obama tabbed him. This would be the same precedent for Harris.
You cannot say she is unqualified. She was an AG a US senator and a VP. You can dislike her politics but she's WAY more qualified than the guy you supported in 2016. Taihtsat
