ADVERTISEMENT

Tastiest dog breed thread - poll coming

It has been reported that Biden has $90 million or so in his campaign. If that money is illegally reallocated to Harris and used for advertising against Trump/for Harris, don't you think that would have a negative effect on Trump?
She has a total right to all that money because she is ON the ticket that that money was raised for. If it was Whitmer - then no, that money would have to either go back or be reallocated to the DNC.

Harris as the new nominee (to be confirmed in early August, likely) is completely WITHIN the bounds of federal election law.

Good to see you care so much about this in light of the campaign finance laws trump has and is accused of violating. Taihtsat
 
She has a total right to all that money because she is ON the ticket that that money was raised for. If it was Whitmer - then no, that money would have to either go back or be reallocated to the DNC.

Harris as the new nominee (to be confirmed in early August, likely) is completely WITHIN the bounds of federal election law.

Good to see you care so much about this in light of the campaign finance laws trump has and is accused of violating. Taihtsat
Use of campaign funds to pay a porn star to kill a story that would hurt the campaign. GOOD!

Appropriation of campaign funds to the current VP who’s accepting the nomination. BAD!

Keep up Krusty there’s a country to save! And all these fine Trump supporters are in the business of saving America!
 
So you don't know . Safe and effective . It went through the same scrutiny a cancer drug would go through and data showed it was effective in preventing covid and those 10% who got covid got mild symptoms.


index.cfm
 
It has been reported that Biden has $90 million or so in his campaign. If that money is illegally reallocated to Harris and used for advertising against Trump/for Harris, don't you think that would have a negative effect on Trump?
Stretch - even your friends at Fox News say that Kamala can use the $96 million. So why would you post the above lie?

 
Stretch - even your friends at Fox News say that Kamala can use the $96 million. So why would you post the above lie?

1. You didn't read that article very closely- it states that there is no guarantee that she can use the money.
2. As I said, I just heard the FEC Chair say that there are specific procedures that must be followed, and the Dems have taken action WRT those funds that doesn't follow the rules, thus leaving themselves open to legal action. Sounded like he expects that.
 
Use of campaign funds to pay a porn star to kill a story that would hurt the campaign. GOOD!

Appropriation of campaign funds to the current VP who’s accepting the nomination. BAD!

Keep up Krusty there’s a country to save! And all these fine Trump supporters are in the business of saving America!
Trump did not use campaign funds for the payoff.

It is not bad if the funds go to Harris as long as they follow proper rules as established by the FEC.
 
Technically she’s not. We are all dying, reporting that an 81 year old is about to die isn’t much of a reach. Problem is she’s probably off by 5 or 10 years but none of you clowns will call this crackpot out on her BS so she’ll keep flinging it at you.
17,000,000 views and 11,000 re-posts.

Nobody I can tell is refuting it.

Do you think that maybe, perhaps, she has scooped the entire MSM yet again?

Possible, I suppose.
 
She has a total right to all that money because she is ON the ticket that that money was raised for. If it was Whitmer - then no, that money would have to either go back or be reallocated to the DNC.

Harris as the new nominee (to be confirmed in early August, likely) is completely WITHIN the bounds of federal election law.

Good to see you care so much about this in light of the campaign finance laws trump has and is accused of violating. Taihtsat
That remains to be seen. Or more likely, litigated.

I assume you are referring to the kangaroo court headed up by Bulgy Bragg. Too bad you are not as willing to denounce Hillary for doing the exact same thing- making an entry saying "Legal Services" when it really wasn't.
 
One word... no.

She just raised 80 million in one day.

What if Biden had mini strokes he didnt know he had just before the debate or his heart wasn't pumping enough oxygen but didnt manifest itself until the debate... because of physical reasons they had to have another candidate , you would be ok with that ?
So your argument that spending $90 million on political ads vs one candidate would not affect that candidate? That is a pretty amazing theory, perhaps you should contact Kamalalala's campaign and suggest they don't need to spend that money and should just use it for partying and trips to the Caribbean.

Don't count on the money to keep rolling in at that rate. That $80 million is primarily due to the dam breaking from all the donors holding back their money after seeing Joe implode in the debate.

I don't know why you insist on always trying to come up with all these hypothetical situation that are not related to the topic. Let me try to be clear-it doesn't matter what the **** reason there is for Joe dropping out. I understand completely that each party has the right to select their candidate for the office. All I am trying to say is that the way they go about selecting that candidate matters. They can do it any damn way they want. However, Joe and Kamala and all the rest of their minions in the Dem party have been preaching (interpret that as lying) to us all for 4 years that they are the most transparent administration in history, and that it is imperative to elect them because "TO SAVE DEMOCRACY!!!". My point is a simple one- after all the preaching about democracy it comes down to them being gigantic hypocrites when they ignore the votes of the 14 million Democrats that selected Biden in the primary. To do a backroom deal like in the old days and ignore the will of the 14 million is hypocritical. If they were honest and wanted to avoid that criticism they would have gone to an open convention.
 
That remains to be seen. Or more likely, litigated.

I assume you are referring to the kangaroo court headed up by Bulgy Bragg. Too bad you are not as willing to denounce Hillary for doing the exact same thing- making an entry saying "Legal Services" when it really wasn't.
Throw Hillary in jail... now what ? Trump got caught, just like he did in the Florida case.
 
Have you actually looked this looney tune up and read about her? When MTG says this: "U.S. representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has claimed she is "mentally unstable and a documented liar", that is saying something.

You continue to link her crap. WTF is wrong with you? Calling Rep. Jackson a "ghetto bitch" after she died, then doubling down on it? That's your preferred source of news? I kinda feel sorry for you, Uber.
 
Have you actually looked this looney tune up and read about her? When MTG says this: "U.S. representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has claimed she is "mentally unstable and a documented liar", that is saying something.

You continue to link her crap. WTF is wrong with you? Calling Rep. Jackson a "ghetto bitch" after she died, then doubling down on it? That's your preferred source of news? I kinda feel sorry for you, Uber.

She can still have connections other people don't have.
 
Have you actually looked this looney tune up and read about her? When MTG says this: "U.S. representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has claimed she is "mentally unstable and a documented liar", that is saying something.

You continue to link her crap. WTF is wrong with you? Calling Rep. Jackson a "ghetto bitch" after she died, then doubling down on it? That's your preferred source of news? I kinda feel sorry for you, Uber.
She seems to be first on political scoops. Her reach is immense, Her work is often stolen much later, validating her work.

I know nothing about her other than she claims to be a Jew, she is tenacious and she is most certainly crass.
 
EDIT

So after just feeding my little canine buddy I stopped going through the other room where FNC was on. Laura Ingraham mentioned that the attorney she was talking to had donated $1,000,000 to the Biden campaign, and he would not donate anything to the Harris campaign because he feels she cannot win. He said if the R's could pick who to run against the top picks would be Harris or Newsome, because folks like Shapiro, Manchin, KY gov, Whitmer would all be much tougher to go against. I found that view interesting.

The next guest she brought on was the president of the FEC. He said that they have a specific process set up for dealing with situations where a candidate drops out, and the typical situation would require the donations to be returned to the donors. If the campaign wanted to do it, they could file for an exception/appeal and get an expedited ruling from the FEC in about 20 days. He said nobody from either Biden campaign or Harris campaign reached out to the FEC to inquire about what they were allowed to do, and that they just changed the title on the account. Said there was surely going to be lawsuits due to those actions, and he clearly gave the impression that what was done was illegal.

So who here is surprised by those actions by the Dems? Not me. As always, for the Dems the ends ALWAYS justify the means.
Interesting.

I read a different article earlier that indicated the previous donations were to the Biden/Harris campaign, so she was OK taking them over.

I’d guess there’s a rule for if a candidate dies, and in this case the details of how the campaign was set up will actually make the determination.
 
A very important data point is missing: how many doses delivered.

It would also be interesting to see exactly how this analysis tied the vaccines to the deaths, since there are practically none (last I checked) that CDC has tied to the vaccine. Correlation is not causation.
 
First, I don’t buy this yet. If it was a reliable source, this would be all over the news.

Second, if he dies, that actually likely smooths the transition to Harris.
Not sure why but all of this makes me think of this scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail

 


Still nothing on decaying Media yet.
Did some looking around. Not a single other source has even a hint of this. Global Press Corp also doesn’t look like much of a news site. They don’t have many stories, and one of their last ones said according to their sources China would invade Taiwan in early June. I suppose they didn’t say what year, but still….doesn’t exactly scream “credibility.”
 
Did some looking around. Not a single other source has even a hint of this. Global Press Corp also doesn’t look like much of a news site. They don’t have many stories, and one of their last ones said according to their sources China would invade Taiwan in early June. I suppose they didn’t say what year, but still….doesn’t exactly scream “credibility.”

What’s going to be really funny is watching goobercoug twist himself into fuggin’ pretzels if Biden shows up on stage with Harris next week.
 
What’s going to be really funny is watching goobercoug twist himself into fuggin’ pretzels if Biden shows up on stage with Harris next week.


Maybe. I do think that "call in" was AI or pre recorded, or both. The lack lf pauses and the speed in which he's speaking without much error. Seems very fishy
 
She seems to be first on political scoops. Her reach is immense, Her work is often stolen much later, validating her work.

I know nothing about her other than she claims to be a Jew, she is tenacious and she is most certainly crass.
Oh, well if she “claims to be a Jew” then she must be the real thing. Jews do have magical powers, ya’ know.
 
A very important data point is missing: how many doses delivered.

It would also be interesting to see exactly how this analysis tied the vaccines to the deaths, since there are practically none (last I checked) that CDC has tied to the vaccine. Correlation is not causation.
According to google, 2.5 billion doses have been issued over the vast 30 years.
 
Nvm. Probable hoax
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What’s going to be really funny is watching goobercoug twist himself into fuggin’ pretzels if Biden shows up on stage with Harris next week.
One thing is for damn sure...Uber will not stray one iota from trusting all these news sources. Classic case of wanting to be affirmed and not informed. Taihtsat
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Coug90
Here’s my take on the situation. Biden has the sniffles from Covid. All of the tinfoil hat attention this is getting they are having him lay low for Kamala and the party’s benefit. It’s distracting for the R campaign and Trump is already losing the press which agitates him. They’ve known this guy for 10 years as a politician, and he’s easy to play. It’s like F’ing with a toddler.

If Biden was dead or dying all of the R blow hards would be losing their shit. MTG, Bobert, Ted, etc. None of them are.

Meanwhile, Trumps already pissed about his VP selection, Vance is flopping hard.

Chess and checkers.
 
Y’all wanted confirmation?

Uber.. serious when I say this .. Did you and Justin attend WSU or are you just fans.

Reason I ask is one of the "things" college gave me was critical thinking and see what makes sense and what doesnt.

You both see very susceptible to this sort of stuff. Biden coukd be dying. Maybe he has the really killer covid. But if he was dying prior to that why did he stay in yhe race?

My dad is in "hospice care" and has been so for two months now. He may live another five years in hospice care . So who knows what Biden's health really is but sure seems odd he would have stayed in the race with a death sentence .
 
That remains to be seen. Or more likely, litigated.

I assume you are referring to the kangaroo court headed up by Bulgy Bragg. Too bad you are not as willing to denounce Hillary for doing the exact same thing- making an entry saying "Legal Services" when it really wasn't.
I could, can and will denounce Clinton for such abuses. The difference is that you apparently CANNOT denounce trump for anything.

As far a Biden claiming transparency and being hypocritical, I say you have forfeited your right to be outraged that an administration may either claim one thing and do another, or withhold information or even lie. Administrations have been doing this since pretty much the beginning.

The difference is that you seem to want to give a free pass to only one of the former administrations. Taihtsat
 
Uber.. serious when I say this .. Did you and Justin attend WSU or are you just fans.

Reason I ask is one of the "things" college gave me was critical thinking and see what makes sense and what doesnt.

You both see very susceptible to this sort of stuff. Biden coukd be dying. Maybe he has the really killer covid. But if he was dying prior to that why did he stay in yhe race?

My dad is in "hospice care" and has been so for two months now. He may live another five years in hospice care . So who knows what Biden's health really is but sure seems odd he would have stayed in the race with a death sentence .
Fvck off, you Jackass credit salesman.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT