ADVERTISEMENT

Tastiest dog breed thread - poll coming

index.cfm
Lustin....there is data out there that shows much different numbers. Nor does your stats show the deaths resulted from the shot.
 
Fvck off, you Jackass credit salesman.
Somebody struck a nerve. His question is entirely reasonable given the ludicrousness of the sources you cite and some of the beliefs you hold.

Answer the questions: did you go to WSU? Is Kamala Jamaican or Black?
 
Spam bots intensify. This seems like the last thread in this forum.

Are we gonna last the day?

It’s close!
 
Fvck off, you Jackass credit salesman.
It is a horrible job but someone has to do it. The attempt at a dig reminds me of the digs at people who sell cars. Almost everyone needs a car and the people I know who are in the car biz dont seem to be hurting.

By your screen name one could almost think you are an Uber driver .

But back to the question which you didnt answer, a fan or attended WSU?

BTW Biden or his AI look alike are supposedly addressing the nation tomorrow .
 
Lustin....there is data out there that shows much different numbers. Nor does your stats show the deaths resulted from the shot.

"Justin I don't believe your numbers even though they're sourced at the bottom if the picture. They also show deaths caused by the vaccine but I'm going to ignore that because it doesn't fit my NBC brainwashed narrative"


Cool story Ed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UberCougars
Somebody struck a nerve. His question is entirely reasonable given the ludicrousness of the sources you cite and some of the beliefs you hold.

Answer the questions: did you go to WSU? Is Kamala Jamaican or Black?
Pimp... I think he is triggered by the fact I am in the credit industry . I hope one of my fellow credit folks didn't turn him down .
 
Last edited:
"Justin I don't believe your numbers even though they're sourced at the bottom if the picture. They also show deaths caused by the vaccine but I'm going to ignore that because it doesn't fit my NBC brainwashed narrative"


Cool story Ed.
LustinTrump Coug...your numbers are numbers without context. It is like saying SMU was 0-12 in 1984 when there were only 11 games . The reason they were 0-12 is because they forfeited all their games.

You need to find data that breaks down the deaths due to the shot.
 
LustinTrump Coug...your numbers are numbers without context. It is like saying SMU was 0-12 in 1984 when there were only 11 games . The reason they were 0-12 is because they forfeited all their games.

You need to find data that breaks down the deaths due to the shot.

Listen Bag o' Bones. You will twist any numbers I give you. You're pointless to talk to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UberCougars
It is a horrible job but someone has to do it. The attempt at a dig reminds me of the digs at people who sell cars. Almost everyone needs a car and the people I know who are in the car biz dont seem to be hurting.

By your screen name one could almost think you are an Uber driver .

But back to the question which you didnt answer, a fan or attended WSU?

BTW Biden or his AI look alike are supposedly addressing the nation tomorrow .
There were highly educated people who drank the Kool aid at Jonestown Ed. You don’t have to be “dumb” to get sucked into a cult. Likewise, there are uneducated folks who aren’t weak minded and dont constantly go running down rabbit holes like these guys.
 
According to google, 2.5 billion doses have been issued over the vast 30 years.
Need to know how many doses per vaccine, and be sure it’s over the same time period.
Frankly, if it’s 2.5 billion doses and 1.4 million adverse reactions, that seems like a pretty acceptable rate.
 
Y’all wanted confirmation?

Using one dubious Twitter source as confirmation for another is not really confirmation. Neither is referencing nebulous “sources say.” Even if that source exists, they might be referencing their best friend’s sister’s boyfriend’s friend who said that Biden collapsed at 31 flavors.

Same applies to the “story” about Biden having a medical emergency at a Mexican restaurant in Vegas. There’s zero chance that could be kept quiet. People would have seen it. Media would have been there - not all friendly media. There would have been local police radio traffic. but somehow the foil hat brigade thinks it could be true.

Maybe he really is sick. But you’re not going to find the truth by getting all your news from Twitter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KRUSTYtheCOUG
Listen Bag o' Bones. You will twist any numbers I give you. You're pointless to talk to.
J Bieber.... your numbers dont mean anything if there is no tie into the shot. I am all ears, it is you who is blinded.

You show me data that shows that and I will freely admit I was mistaken.

But I asked a very simple question tgatvwas answered for me nit by MSNBC or Morning Joe, but someone who that is his business at a very high level

So I will attempt to ask the question again. Why when covid come out did the vaccine in the three trials protect at a rate of 90% rate and have a 95% rate of keeping a patient from getting serious bought of covid if they did get covid.?

And why did the trials show the safety of the shot in three trials?
 
J Bieber.... your numbers dont mean anything if there is no tie into the shot. I am all ears, it is you who is blinded.

You show me data that shows that and I will freely admit I was mistaken.

But I asked a very simple question tgatvwas answered for me nit by MSNBC or Morning Joe, but someone who that is his business at a very high level

So I will attempt to ask the question again. Why when covid come out did the vaccine in the three trials protect at a rate of 90% rate and have a 95% rate of keeping a patient from getting serious bought of covid if they did get covid.?

And why did the trials show the safety of the shot in three trials?
Ed the Scientologist
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_1nb5kgc7kwlls
Ed the Scientologist
I am simply asking for numbers tying the shot and the deaths . I am very open to admitting my friend who is a scientist by trade and a CEO in the bio industry . Everything he has ever been taught in college and everything he has experienced in the industry is data driven. No emotion . As an aside , if he hits on one drug out of twelve in trial they are happy. So he knows data .

It isn't that hard , I submit 32k died after taking the shot. I dont dispute that number. But what college did for me is to ask yhe next question ... ho many people had a heart attack, stroke or something else that their physical condition predisposed them to.

I have a client who got vaxxed. She told
me she believed the shot was the reason she had retina issues .

I didnt tell her no that wasnt what happened . I understand why she made that supposition. I just told her to ask her eye doc, and if not the answer she wanted to hear ask anither eye doc. Went to three different eye docs and all three said it was not related to the shot.
 
Ed the Scientologist
You do get why J Bieber nor you even know why the trials had more success than the shot did in real time. And guess what, I knew that was a possibility before the shot ever came out because of a convo I had with my scientist buddy in April 2020 .
 
You do get why J Bieber nor you even know why the trials had more success than the shot did in real time. And guess what, I knew that was a possibility before the shot ever came out because of a convo I had with my scientist buddy in April 2020 .

What do you not get? The media said safs and effective. It is not safe if people die after taking it. It is not effective if you still get covid after getting it.

If folks had pre existing conditions and the vaccine tipped them over the edge, of course that will happen. But that same logic has to be applied to covid19 numbers. Those same numbers that the media used (which were inflated by people dying with co morbidities) to push the vaccine in the first place.
 
Ok - I filtered my posts by replies with a 7 day time limit. Got the spam off page 1 anyway.....

For a minute. The filter keeps resetting on me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeteTheChop
What do you not get? The media said safs and effective. It is not safe if people die after taking it. It is not effective if you still get covid after getting it.

If folks had pre existing conditions and the vaccine tipped them over the edge, of course that will happen. But that same logic has to be applied to covid19 numbers. Those same numbers that the media used (which were inflated by people dying with co morbidities) to push the vaccine in the first place.
Bieber... the "media" made that claim because thats what the three trials showed.

I will ask a fourth time .. do you know why shot was effective in the three trials and was not as effective in preventing covid when they started giving to the public .

Also do you know how they knew the shot was safe after the three trials ?

I dont believe the sites you go to know why that is the case and thus you dont.
 
What do you not get? The media said safs and effective. It is not safe if people die after taking it. It is not effective if you still get covid after getting it.

If folks had pre existing conditions and the vaccine tipped them over the edge, of course that will happen. But that same logic has to be applied to covid19 numbers. Those same numbers that the media used (which were inflated by people dying with co morbidities) to push the vaccine in the first place.
As 95 pointed correlation does not equal causation. So statistically and expectantly, after a couple billion shots are given, someone will certainly die after getting the shot.

Then people will assume what preceed directly caused what followed and without verification will go and report to a site that specifically states that the reports are NOT verified.

Direct and specific question that I assume you will dodge: if the vaccine was not effective, why did party affiliation predict who died at a higher rate during covid when comparing who got the vaccine and who didn't?
 
What do you not get? The media said safs and effective. It is not safe if people die after taking it. It is not effective if you still get covid after getting it.

If folks had pre existing conditions and the vaccine tipped them over the edge, of course that will happen. But that same logic has to be applied to covid19 numbers. Those same numbers that the media used (which were inflated by people dying with co morbidities) to push the vaccine in the first place.
This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.

If the numbers above are accurate, and there were 1.4 million adverse reactions out of 2.5 billion doses, that’s pretty good. 1 reaction in 1,785 doses (and most of those reactions are mild) or 0.06%. If there are 32,000 deaths (which I’m dubious of), that’s 1 per 78,000 doses, or 0.001%. So literally 99.999% of people survive, and 99.94% of people have no complications. If skydiving was that safe, everyone would do it.
 
This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.

If the numbers above are accurate, and there were 1.4 million adverse reactions out of 2.5 billion doses, that’s pretty good. 1 reaction in 1,785 doses (and most of those reactions are mild) or 0.06%. If there are 32,000 deaths (which I’m dubious of), that’s 1 per 78,000 doses, or 0.001%. So literally 99.999% of people survive, and 99.94% of people have no complications. If skydiving was that safe, everyone would do it.
Assumptions of tinfoil hat wearers: Deaths from the jab are directly attributed to the jab and accurately reported. Full stop. Deaths from Covid are grossly miscalculated and most of those people are old and basically about to be dead anyways or had some sort of pre-existing condition where Covid finished them off. Also car accidents, drug overdoses (brought into the country from illegals and our open border no doubt!! Oh wait, Trump was president then scratch that, they were passed out by libs in burning cities), water buffalo attacks, Jewish space laser explosions, and windmill cancer deaths were also misreported as covid deaths. In total like maybe 3 people died from Covid.
 
This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.

If the numbers above are accurate, and there were 1.4 million adverse reactions out of 2.5 billion doses, that’s pretty good. 1 reaction in 1,785 doses (and most of those reactions are mild) or 0.06%. If there are 32,000 deaths (which I’m dubious of), that’s 1 per 78,000 doses, or 0.001%. So literally 99.999% of people survive, and 99.94% of people have no complications. If skydiving was that safe, everyone would do it.
This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.

If the numbers above are accurate, and there were 1.4 million adverse reactions out of 2.5 billion doses, that’s pretty good. 1 reaction in 1,785 doses (and most of those reactions are mild) or 0.06%. If there are 32,000 deaths (which I’m dubious of), that’s 1 per 78,000 doses, or 0.001%. So literally 99.999% of people survive, and 99.94% of people have no complications. If skydiving was that safe, everyone would do it.

You're only factoring deaths which is the worst side effect imaginable. The adverse effects number will obviously show a higher %

The 2.5 billion administered is I believe 2024 numbers, the picture I posted is from 2022. So it will be a little different numbers wise
 
You're only factoring deaths which is the worst side effect imaginable. The adverse effects number will obviously show a higher %

The 2.5 billion administered is I believe 2024 numbers, the picture I posted is from 2022. So it will be a little different numbers wise
JC... since i am not following the same sources of information as you, can you point to why the trials were so good that the media used as their statement shots were safe and effective and why in the end they were not as effective?
 
Last edited:
I will be interested in hearing in a year what theu truly find out where the breakdown occurred.
Agreed. I don’t think this is by any means the end of this story and literally anything is possible especially in this political landscape. Most likely though this crew thought they were prepared and just got caught with their pants down. There’s no “ok” with a job like this, you either execute or fail miserably.
 
You're only factoring deaths which is the worst side effect imaginable. The adverse effects number will obviously show a higher %

The 2.5 billion administered is I believe 2024 numbers, the picture I posted is from 2022. So it will be a little different numbers wise
You are avoiding my question. Why?
 
Agreed. I don’t think this is by any means the end of this story and literally anything is possible especially in this political landscape. Most likely though this crew thought they were prepared and just got caught with their pants down. There’s no “ok” with a job like this, you either execute or fail miserably.

I have a co-worker who is very, very pro-Trump and he said that this feels like a situation where it had been so long since someone tried something against a President or Presidential Candidate that everyone was going through the motions more than actively worrying about things. So...not every Trump supporter is convinced that Biden and the deep state was trying to kill Trump.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT