Lustin....there is data out there that shows much different numbers. Nor does your stats show the deaths resulted from the shot.
Lustin....there is data out there that shows much different numbers. Nor does your stats show the deaths resulted from the shot.
Somebody struck a nerve. His question is entirely reasonable given the ludicrousness of the sources you cite and some of the beliefs you hold.Fvck off, you Jackass credit salesman.
check your e-mail, Kamala has your new marching orders.One thing is for damn sure...Uber will not stray one iota from trusting all these news sources. Classic case of wanting to be affirmed and not informed. Taihtsat
It is a horrible job but someone has to do it. The attempt at a dig reminds me of the digs at people who sell cars. Almost everyone needs a car and the people I know who are in the car biz dont seem to be hurting.Fvck off, you Jackass credit salesman.
Lustin....there is data out there that shows much different numbers. Nor does your stats show the deaths resulted from the shot.
Pimp... I think he is triggered by the fact I am in the credit industry . I hope one of my fellow credit folks didn't turn him down .Somebody struck a nerve. His question is entirely reasonable given the ludicrousness of the sources you cite and some of the beliefs you hold.
Answer the questions: did you go to WSU? Is Kamala Jamaican or Black?
LustinTrump Coug...your numbers are numbers without context. It is like saying SMU was 0-12 in 1984 when there were only 11 games . The reason they were 0-12 is because they forfeited all their games."Justin I don't believe your numbers even though they're sourced at the bottom if the picture. They also show deaths caused by the vaccine but I'm going to ignore that because it doesn't fit my NBC brainwashed narrative"
Cool story Ed.
LustinTrump Coug...your numbers are numbers without context. It is like saying SMU was 0-12 in 1984 when there were only 11 games . The reason they were 0-12 is because they forfeited all their games.
You need to find data that breaks down the deaths due to the shot.
There were highly educated people who drank the Kool aid at Jonestown Ed. You don’t have to be “dumb” to get sucked into a cult. Likewise, there are uneducated folks who aren’t weak minded and dont constantly go running down rabbit holes like these guys.It is a horrible job but someone has to do it. The attempt at a dig reminds me of the digs at people who sell cars. Almost everyone needs a car and the people I know who are in the car biz dont seem to be hurting.
By your screen name one could almost think you are an Uber driver .
But back to the question which you didnt answer, a fan or attended WSU?
BTW Biden or his AI look alike are supposedly addressing the nation tomorrow .
Need to know how many doses per vaccine, and be sure it’s over the same time period.According to google, 2.5 billion doses have been issued over the vast 30 years.
Using one dubious Twitter source as confirmation for another is not really confirmation. Neither is referencing nebulous “sources say.” Even if that source exists, they might be referencing their best friend’s sister’s boyfriend’s friend who said that Biden collapsed at 31 flavors.
J Bieber.... your numbers dont mean anything if there is no tie into the shot. I am all ears, it is you who is blinded.Listen Bag o' Bones. You will twist any numbers I give you. You're pointless to talk to.
Ed the ScientologistJ Bieber.... your numbers dont mean anything if there is no tie into the shot. I am all ears, it is you who is blinded.
You show me data that shows that and I will freely admit I was mistaken.
But I asked a very simple question tgatvwas answered for me nit by MSNBC or Morning Joe, but someone who that is his business at a very high level
So I will attempt to ask the question again. Why when covid come out did the vaccine in the three trials protect at a rate of 90% rate and have a 95% rate of keeping a patient from getting serious bought of covid if they did get covid.?
And why did the trials show the safety of the shot in three trials?
I am simply asking for numbers tying the shot and the deaths . I am very open to admitting my friend who is a scientist by trade and a CEO in the bio industry . Everything he has ever been taught in college and everything he has experienced in the industry is data driven. No emotion . As an aside , if he hits on one drug out of twelve in trial they are happy. So he knows data .Ed the Scientologist
You do get why J Bieber nor you even know why the trials had more success than the shot did in real time. And guess what, I knew that was a possibility before the shot ever came out because of a convo I had with my scientist buddy in April 2020 .Ed the Scientologist
Well, if that’s what you took from what I said…OK.95Coug: “don’t trust media”
Agree completely.
You do get why J Bieber nor you even know why the trials had more success than the shot did in real time. And guess what, I knew that was a possibility before the shot ever came out because of a convo I had with my scientist buddy in April 2020 .
Bieber... the "media" made that claim because thats what the three trials showed.What do you not get? The media said safs and effective. It is not safe if people die after taking it. It is not effective if you still get covid after getting it.
If folks had pre existing conditions and the vaccine tipped them over the edge, of course that will happen. But that same logic has to be applied to covid19 numbers. Those same numbers that the media used (which were inflated by people dying with co morbidities) to push the vaccine in the first place.
As 95 pointed correlation does not equal causation. So statistically and expectantly, after a couple billion shots are given, someone will certainly die after getting the shot.What do you not get? The media said safs and effective. It is not safe if people die after taking it. It is not effective if you still get covid after getting it.
If folks had pre existing conditions and the vaccine tipped them over the edge, of course that will happen. But that same logic has to be applied to covid19 numbers. Those same numbers that the media used (which were inflated by people dying with co morbidities) to push the vaccine in the first place.
This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.What do you not get? The media said safs and effective. It is not safe if people die after taking it. It is not effective if you still get covid after getting it.
If folks had pre existing conditions and the vaccine tipped them over the edge, of course that will happen. But that same logic has to be applied to covid19 numbers. Those same numbers that the media used (which were inflated by people dying with co morbidities) to push the vaccine in the first place.
Assumptions of tinfoil hat wearers: Deaths from the jab are directly attributed to the jab and accurately reported. Full stop. Deaths from Covid are grossly miscalculated and most of those people are old and basically about to be dead anyways or had some sort of pre-existing condition where Covid finished them off. Also car accidents, drug overdoses (brought into the country from illegals and our open border no doubt!! Oh wait, Trump was president then scratch that, they were passed out by libs in burning cities), water buffalo attacks, Jewish space laser explosions, and windmill cancer deaths were also misreported as covid deaths. In total like maybe 3 people died from Covid.This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.
If the numbers above are accurate, and there were 1.4 million adverse reactions out of 2.5 billion doses, that’s pretty good. 1 reaction in 1,785 doses (and most of those reactions are mild) or 0.06%. If there are 32,000 deaths (which I’m dubious of), that’s 1 per 78,000 doses, or 0.001%. So literally 99.999% of people survive, and 99.94% of people have no complications. If skydiving was that safe, everyone would do it.
This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.
If the numbers above are accurate, and there were 1.4 million adverse reactions out of 2.5 billion doses, that’s pretty good. 1 reaction in 1,785 doses (and most of those reactions are mild) or 0.06%. If there are 32,000 deaths (which I’m dubious of), that’s 1 per 78,000 doses, or 0.001%. So literally 99.999% of people survive, and 99.94% of people have no complications. If skydiving was that safe, everyone would do it.
This is a semantics argument. You have to decide what an acceptable number of reactions and deaths is, because every medication has them. “Safe” does not mean zero reactions.
If the numbers above are accurate, and there were 1.4 million adverse reactions out of 2.5 billion doses, that’s pretty good. 1 reaction in 1,785 doses (and most of those reactions are mild) or 0.06%. If there are 32,000 deaths (which I’m dubious of), that’s 1 per 78,000 doses, or 0.001%. So literally 99.999% of people survive, and 99.94% of people have no complications. If skydiving was that safe, everyone would do it.
JC... since i am not following the same sources of information as you, can you point to why the trials were so good that the media used as their statement shots were safe and effective and why in the end they were not as effective?You're only factoring deaths which is the worst side effect imaginable. The adverse effects number will obviously show a higher %
The 2.5 billion administered is I believe 2024 numbers, the picture I posted is from 2022. So it will be a little different numbers wise
Yeah captain obvious. Uber seems to be fishing for disagreements here. None from me.She needed to go. The incompetence was very high with her.
Low hanging fruit and I wanted to prove that I could agree with him on something?Yeah captain obvious. Uber seems to be fishing for disagreements here. None from me.
I will be interested in hearing in a year what theu truly find out where the breakdown occurred.Yeah captain obvious. Uber seems to be fishing for disagreements here. None from me.
Agreed. I don’t think this is by any means the end of this story and literally anything is possible especially in this political landscape. Most likely though this crew thought they were prepared and just got caught with their pants down. There’s no “ok” with a job like this, you either execute or fail miserably.I will be interested in hearing in a year what theu truly find out where the breakdown occurred.
You are avoiding my question. Why?You're only factoring deaths which is the worst side effect imaginable. The adverse effects number will obviously show a higher %
The 2.5 billion administered is I believe 2024 numbers, the picture I posted is from 2022. So it will be a little different numbers wise
Agreed. I don’t think this is by any means the end of this story and literally anything is possible especially in this political landscape. Most likely though this crew thought they were prepared and just got caught with their pants down. There’s no “ok” with a job like this, you either execute or fail miserably.