Wait, What? BSU inks new multimedia deal?
- By roses04
- The Cougar Lair
- 6 Replies
If Learfield was smart, they would have made the removal of the blue turf a condition of the deal.
Valid perspective, but…
Insisting on choosing a D or R candidate just perpetuates the issue with the 2 party system and incentivizes neither of them to return to the middle and pick a better candidate.
If wishes and buts were candy and nuts...Valid perspective, but…
Insisting on choosing a D or R candidate just perpetuates the issue with the 2 party system and incentivizes neither of them to return to the middle and pick a better candidate.
We have 10 candidates this year. Pick a different one. If 50 million people do that, the wheels start to come off the 2 party system.
Generally speaking, Cal and Purdue are coaching graveyards.If were thinking about Dickert leaving for another program, where's another fit that's better? Not much jumped out on this list of "coaches on the hot seat". Maybe Purdue or Cal if they open? I know Dickert showed up on lists last season, but none (Nebraska, Wisconsin, etc.) really seemed realistic IMO.
I don’t agree with the argument that it makes regular season games meaningless either. North Carolina/Duke, Kentucky/Memphis, don’t have this problem in basketball. You are still jockeying for position and home field. Alabama and their fans still want to beat Georgia in the regular season. It just puts more teams in the conversation that normally wouldn’t be which is more exciting for everyone.Seriously though, imagine the hype building 3-2-1 weeks out going into a 28 team tournament.
The revenue this tournament would generate would be immense. How much would the players get, I wonder?
Based on exactly the same thoughts, I actually went to the websites for all 10 candidates and read their planks. Some of them are certainly narrow (I.e., capitalism has failed and needs to be eliminated), and some are focused mostly on a couple of things, but nearly all of them at least give broad strokes on the major issues. I narrowed it to 2 who could get through full paragraphs without saying something idiotic, which neither Trump or Harris could manage.Yeah, with you on that. I know I'm just voting a lean and holding my nose. My recollection (I'm not in Washington now, but in another state with a much different approach to voting -- that's another subject) was that most of those candidates in the guide tended to represent single-issue or otherwise cabined/siloed views (e.g., libertarian, green, "constitution," etc.) that tended to be either extreme or, at least, targeted and approaching things through a narrow lens, but the majority candidates are so extreme and otherwise ridiculous at this point that I wouldn't be surprised if one of those other candidates aligned with my views better than either the R or D.
Yeah, with you on that. I know I'm just voting a lean and holding my nose. My recollection (I'm not in Washington now, but in another state with a much different approach to voting -- that's another subject) was that most of those candidates in the guide tended to represent single-issue or otherwise cabined/siloed views (e.g., libertarian, green, "constitution," etc.) that tended to be either extreme or, at least, targeted and approaching things through a narrow lens, but the majority candidates are so extreme and otherwise ridiculous at this point that I wouldn't be surprised if one of those other candidates aligned with my views better than either the R or D.I agree, but I think those more centrist people are currently in a position where they feel forced to vote their lean…not their choice. The overwhelming majority are holding their nose and casting a vote against one candidate.
When there are 10 on the ballot - as there are in Washington - most should be able to not hold their nose so tightly. Reading through the 10 platforms, there were none that I agreed with completely…but the D and R ones were among the most outlandish, and had more pillars that I disagree with than most of the platforms did.
For sure, I'll have to check it out!I wandered in there off the street when I stayed a night in Albuquerque in about 2009. Didn’t look them up, didn’t even look at the name. Looking at the reviews and pictures…that’s the place.
Damn good, and no messing around with unnecessary things like plates and utensils.
I agree, but I think those more centrist people are currently in a position where they feel forced to vote their lean…not their choice. The overwhelming majority are holding their nose and casting a vote against one candidate.I used to believe a third party that positioned itself as centrist could be viable, potentially enough to actually govern at some point. Centrist, "sane" candidates have a very hard time winning primaries in the two-party system. A third party could have its own primary process, and if it somehow could get enough attention and dollars, you would think it could, or at least should, work. Most Americans want similar things ... e.g., centrist Democrat policies from the 90s/early 2000s. No, not denying science, trying to make America a theological nation, or meritless armed conflict, as more extreme Republicans of that era did. Not about cutting taxes to the bone, running huge deficits to spend on defense, and so on. But also not trying to frame everything in identity group politics or going way out on the tail of extreme policies regarding myriad issues (e.g., the border, illegal immigration, policing and safety, DEI, transgender matters, censorship, abortion, court-packing, reparations, and various other things), many of which wouldn't have even had majority support in places like Berkeley in that era.
Things have gotten so extreme, with apparent disagreement over things that shouldn't be all that controversial--each day is so insane with the news flow that I can't discern whether this is just election-related posturing or something indicative of greater partisan divergence--that it no longer is clear to me the sizeable, silent, largely apolitical middle who just wants things that make sense could ever come together to get it done.
The media also is a massive problem. It has leaned left at least for the past six decades, and it was Murdoch who first created the current-day polarized talking head shitshow with Fox, of course, but the left-leaning cable outlets at this point are just as bad if not worse, and the legacy MSM isn't far behind. This contributes to further demonization of the other side and polarization, and no centrist, dispassionate media outlet ever is viable despite a few attempts to start them over the years. What gets viewed, consumed, and ads purchased is extreme bullshit on both sides, blasted out to political obsessives who lap it up.
Try looking at the "other side's" material for a little bit on social media. You'll find it repugnant at a visceral level, yes, and I can barely do it on either side, but gut through it for a few minutes and realize how the same world is portrayed completely differently. Balanced views simply aren't presented. Facts that don't support that side's narrative, which at this point is just that the other side is abhorrent, corrupt, and will put you in camps and ruin the country, regardless of which side you are on, aren't reported even if they are merely neutral or clarifying. There is no place for moderates, even though they probably still represent a plurality in this country. They are left to try to look at the ridiculous shit from both sides and trying to discern truth from caricatures and absurdity.
That probably will piss off everyone, which itself would be telling vis-à-vis the viability of centrists now and going forward.
I used to believe a third party that positioned itself as centrist could be viable, potentially enough to actually govern at some point. Centrist, "sane" candidates have a very hard time winning primaries in the two-party system. A third party could have its own primary process, and if it somehow could get enough attention and dollars, you would think it could, or at least should, work. Most Americans want similar things ... e.g., centrist Democrat policies from the 90s/early 2000s. No, not denying science, trying to make America a theological nation, or meritless armed conflict, as more extreme Republicans of that era did. Not about cutting taxes to the bone, running huge deficits to spend on defense, and so on. But also not trying to frame everything in identity group politics or going way out on the tail of extreme policies regarding myriad issues (e.g., the border, illegal immigration, policing and safety, DEI, transgender matters, censorship, abortion, court-packing, reparations, and various other things), many of which wouldn't have even had majority support in places like Berkeley in that era.Valid perspective, but…
Insisting on choosing a D or R candidate just perpetuates the issue with the 2 party system and incentivizes neither of them to return to the middle and pick a better candidate.
We have 10 candidates this year. Pick a different one. If 50 million people do that, the wheels start to come off the 2 party system.
Valid perspective, but…Maybe you think by not casting a vote for either you're making a moral stance to be above them both. You're in good company with several others on this board using the demographics of Washington as a cop-out. Congratulations, your medal is in the mail! Taihtsat
I wandered in there off the street when I stayed a night in Albuquerque in about 2009. Didn’t look them up, didn’t even look at the name. Looking at the reviews and pictures…that’s the place.Just read a ton of remarkable reviews on Rudy's. Looks great, thanks for the tip, Stretch!
Hilarious when Democrats try to bring up morality in presidential debates.
I'm pretty sure EVERYONE has baggage from one time or another, but LAWS and current/recent actions speak the loudest.
Great job with illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities guys. Bravo!
Tell me again what action/law Trump had for a 12-year old Houston girl to get rated?
You guys should donate more money to help those guys get sex changes.
Oh wait... maybe more covid shots since people shouldn't be able to choose.
Mmmkay…sounds like some deflection, but you do you. Case closed I guess 🤷And yes, the Soros family brought a lawsuit against the Soros family . The lawsuit was settled out of court without discovery when the Soros family trust agreed to settle with the Soros family trust.
I do fine navigating X thanks though! It’s a good thing everything posted on X is 100% accurate and a reliable source of information! 😂Breathe.
Smart people will notice this is an issue brought by Michigans Secretary of State, Joyce something. She is a Democrat.
If you’d like to know more about the issues voters are experiencing with her machines, X makes it easy for folks with an IQ above 60, to find additional sources of information to help you understand, with a simple click.
If you still can’t figure it out, let me know. I’ll be here to help you.
Good luck!
And yes, the Soros family brought a lawsuit against the Soros family . The lawsuit was settled out of court without discovery when the Soros family trust agreed to settle with the Soros family trust.Is your money buried in the back yard? You send messages to people via letter and stamp? Do you renew your vehicle tabs and license online or go wait in line for an hour at the DMV/vehicle licensing offices? All of these very personal things we are totally fine with doing electronically nowadays, yet somehow this one is massively fraudulent?
Didn’t Dominion already sue the tits off of Fox or OAN and win or they settled? Probably nuthin…🤷
And who TF is Robby Starbuck 😂. Does he work with Stormy Daniels too?
Is your money buried in the back yard? You send messages to people via letter and stamp? Do you renew your vehicle tabs and license online or go wait in line for an hour at the DMV/vehicle licensing offices? All of these very personal things we are totally fine with doing electronically nowadays, yet somehow this one is massively fraudulent?
If we’d beat BSU we’d be top 10 in the country RN. I agree the early polls are silly and mostly meaningless but when you have the resume you have the resume. I’m not sure it makes much of a difference by mid Nov where you started.