Soon after WW1, Lone Star Dietz already in his mid 30s was put on trial in Spokane for "draft dodging" by the Wilson Administration.Nope. Schulz said so in an interview. Good Lord. What a fiasco this has become.
Only problem after he is fired for cause rolo will go after Schultz for damages divulging personal health info. Be better shut up and fire him when he is t vaxed then take chances in courtNope. Schulz said so in an interview. Good Lord. What a fiasco this has become.
Good luck. He divulged it to the WSU Faculty Senate. Just like medical professionals can talk about a persons medical history as work product, Shultz is informing other's in WSU administration. That is work product.Only problem after he is fired for cause rolo will go after Schultz for damages divulging personal health info. Be better shut up and fire him when he is t vaxed then take chances in court
Not in an interview. He was notifying the WSU Faculty Senate.Nope. Schulz said so in an interview. Good Lord. What a fiasco this has become.
Pretty sure he recently said something like he was "going to follow the mandate so he could continue to coach here."Maybe by follow the mandate he meant he’d leave his position willfully?
Andrew Wiggins in the NBA was just denied a religious exemption...not sure it's going to be easy.It appears that religious exemptions will actually be pretty easy to get - and don’t require actual religion - so I’d guess he’s going that route, along with most people who had personal exemptions.
They’ll be legal threats, but in the end, there will be a buyout settlement and that’ll be that.Only problem after he is fired for cause rolo will go after Schultz for damages divulging personal health info. Be better shut up and fire him when he is t vaxed then take chances in court
Not for you or anyone else to decide what an "actual" religion is, especially not an employer or anyone associated with the government.It appears that religious exemptions will actually be pretty easy to get - and don’t require actual religion - so I’d guess he’s going that route, along with most people who had personal exemptions.
No common standard though. Rolo will be evaluated based on WSU’s standard, not on the NBA’sAndrew Wiggins in the NBA was just denied a religious exemption...not sure it's going to be easy.
Maybe that one that is focused on peyote smoking. Might help explain some things like that goal line formation.It turns out that it is really hard to identify a religion that opposes the COVID vaccine. Nobody seems able to actually name a formal religion which forbids the vaccine.
If being a jackass counts as a religion, then Rolo is their Pope.
Which religion?
Trump said he wanted to appoint Justices like Justice Scalia to the Supreme Court.Not for you or anyone else to decide what an "actual" religion is, especially not an employer or anyone associated with the government.
if he remains unvaccinated, and gets no exemption they wont have to fire him, he will not be eligible for state employment, suspended without pay. Once he's gone it's more than likely for goodOnly problem after he is fired for cause rolo will go after Schultz for damages divulging personal health info. Be better shut up and fire him when he is t vaxed then take chances in court
Good luck. He divulged it to the WSU Faculty Senate. Just like medical professionals can talk about a persons medical history as work product, Shultz is informing other's in WSU administration. That is work product.
Wow, that is some word salad! The difference here is, we aren't talking about law, we are talking about mandates.Trump said he wanted to appoint Justices like Justice Scalia to the Supreme Court.
This is what Justice Scalia said about religious exemptions to generally applicable laws. "To make such an individual's obligation to obey such a law contingent on the laws coincidence with his religious beliefs...permitting him, by virtue of his beliefs to become a law onto himself contradicts both constitutional tradition and common sense."
OK. Not sure the point you are making. Shultz didn't go to the press. He discussed the situation with his colleagues, which is something that he can do. Yes, work product has to be produced. But, in this situation, as they are not trying to hide anything, it's irrelevant,Work product has to be produced for purposes of litigation.
It’s been publicly disclosed. It doesn’t matter how. And it’s not work product.OK. Not sure the point you are making. Shultz didn't go to the press. He discussed the situation with his colleagues, which is something that he can do. Yes, work product has to be produced. But, in this situation, as they are not trying to hide anything, it's irrelevant,
So will the warriors not pay him for home games? We are going to be dealing with some of that where I work.Andrew Wiggins in the NBA was just denied a religious exemption...not sure it's going to be easy.
We have people citing their strong pro life stance and the loose link to developing the vaccine with aborted fetus tissue from the 70s along with a few bible versus. I’m fairly sure they are just googling what to say to get a religious exemption because of the way it’s written but who are we to deny that as an employer?It turns out that it is really hard to identify a religion that opposes the COVID vaccine. Nobody seems able to actually name a formal religion which forbids the vaccine.
If being a jackass counts as a religion, then Rolo is their Pope.
Which religion?
Religious exemption is hard to get. I know quite a few state employees who went for that and none have been granted. The state has really stacked the odds against any kind of exemption.It appears that religious exemptions will actually be pretty easy to get - and don’t require actual religion - so I’d guess he’s going that route, along with most people who had personal exemptions.
Does Rolo qualify for a religious exemption? Probably not. It needs to be a sincerely held belief. But that doesn't mean because you can't know for certain what is in a man's mind, that Rolo get's a pass. You have to have walked the walk. People forget that there are existing vaccine mandates. Has Rolo sought religious emptions previously? To work at WSU you must show proof that you have been vaccinated for measles. Did he apply for the exemption previously, and was it approved? If he had, Schultz and the senate wouldn't be addressing it now.
Then they aren't trying the right one. Maybe Rolo is a member of the Unicult?Religious exemption is hard to get. I know quite a few state employees who went for that and none have been granted. The state has really stacked the odds against any kind of exemption.
It wasn't my word salad it was Scalia's. I'm humored that you think a health mandate on state employee's issued by the governor of the state doesn't have the force of law. It does.Wow, that is some word salad! The difference here is, we aren't talking about law, we are talking about mandates.
Does Rolo qualify for a religious exemption? Probably not. It needs to be a sincerely held belief. But that doesn't mean because you can't know for certain what is in a man's mind, that Rolo get's a pass. You have to have walked the walk. People forget that there are existing vaccine mandates. Has Rolo sought religious emptions previously? To work at WSU you must show proof that you have been vaccinated for measles. Did he apply for the exemption previously, and was it approved? If he had, Schultz and the senate wouldn't be addressing it now.
Will Rolo be able to get court help! Probably not. Regardless of what you think of Covid, courts act with a long term view (except when little old ladies are involved, inside joke). A court may think Covid is seriously overblown, but precedence is the predominant legal view point. What happens the next time, when there is a disease that is an existential threat? Are they willing to make law now that seriously hinders governments from acting in a quick and draconian manner to protect society in a full blown national health emergency? Gutting the coercive effect of vaccine mandates by making exemptions obtainable on honor system, would do that. That is highly doubtful.
Not for you or anyone else to decide what an "actual" religion is, especially not an employer or anyone associated with the government.
I would then think that the state needs to be very careful that every state employee is treated equally. Or they may face a rash of law suits.The guidance that came out was pretty vague on what qualifies.
I would then think that the state needs to be very careful that every state employee is treated equally. Or they may face a rash of law suits.
Does this sound right to you, DGib? I’m not an attorney so I couldn’t say for sure.
Your "problem" has nothing to do with the situation. Someone's "religion" should never have to be tested by an employer, bureaucrat or anyone else for that matter, for it is THEIR religion. Once we dive into mandating employers and or bureaucrats testing someone's faith, we are headed down a steep, slippery slope that flies in eh face of a country founded on religious liberty.My problem is when someone doesn't have a religion until they are trying to use it to avoid something......
I am aware who tossed the salad and I am also aware of your goal by eliciting Trump and Scalia to prove your point, nice try. Employers and bureaucrats testing folks religions is ripe for abuse and is the flat out wrong way to approach this.It wasn't my word salad it was Scalia's. I'm humored that you think a health mandate on state employee's issued by the governor of the state doesn't have the force of law. It does.
From what agencies? Because the guidance was vague, each employer is determining what qualifies. Each agency will have slightly different rules. There is no standard approach, and WSU’s does not require affiliation with an actual recognized religion - just that you articulate a “belief.”Religious exemption is hard to get. I know quite a few state employees who went for that and none have been granted. The state has really stacked the odds against any kind of exemption.
You don’t have to show proof of measles vaccination to work at WSU.Does Rolo qualify for a religious exemption? Probably not. It needs to be a sincerely held belief. But that doesn't mean because you can't know for certain what is in a man's mind, that Rolo get's a pass. You have to have walked the walk. People forget that there are existing vaccine mandates. Has Rolo sought religious emptions previously? To work at WSU you must show proof that you have been vaccinated for measles. Did he apply for the exemption previously, and was it approved? If he had, Schultz and the senate wouldn't be addressing it now.
Will Rolo be able to get court help! Probably not. Regardless of what you think of Covid, courts act with a long term view (except when little old ladies are involved, inside joke). A court may think Covid is seriously overblown, but precedence is the predominant legal view point. What happens the next time, when there is a disease that is an existential threat? Are they willing to make law now that seriously hinders governments from acting in a quick and draconian manner to protect society in a full blown national health emergency? Gutting the coercive effect of vaccine mandates by making exemptions obtainable on honor system, would do that. That is highly doubtful.
From what agencies? Because the guidance was vague, each employer is determining what qualifies. Each agency will have slightly different rules. There is no standard approach, and WSU’s does not require affiliation with an actual recognized religion - just that you articulate a “belief.”