According to the Times Rolo time ain't vaccinated

[Cougsocal]

I am aware who tossed the salad and I am also aware of your goal by eliciting Trump and Scalia to prove your point, nice try. Employers and bureaucrats testing folks religions is ripe for abuse and is the flat out wrong way to approach this.

The state and private employers don't have to offer any exceptions to a mandate, none, but with religion the state apparently did so out of some badly misguided concept of moral obligation. Virtually, all employees are "at will" who, with very limited exception, you can be fired for any reason, or no reason at all. The state will rue the day that it offered a religious exemption, as no good deed goes unpunished. You tend to prove that point.

 

[dgibbons]

The state and private employers don't have to offer any exceptions to a mandate, none, but with religion the state apparently did so out of some badly misguided concept of moral obligation. Virtually, all employees are "at will" who, with very limited exception, you can be fired for any reason, or no reason at all. The state will rue the day that it offered a religious exemption, as no good deed goes unpunished. You tend to prove that point.

If the state did not offer a religious exemption WA would have lost a Supreme Court case.

 

[FnuLnu]

The state and private employers don't have to offer any exceptions to a mandate, none, but with religion the state apparently did so out of some badly misguided concept of moral obligation. Virtually, all employees are "at will" who, with very limited exception, you can be fired for any reason, or no reason at all. The state will rue the day that it offered a religious exemption, as no good deed goes unpunished. You tend to prove that point.

See student deferments and the Vietnam draft and the trash Boomer politicians & faculty who got them.

 

[95coug]

The guidance is the same for state employees.

But there’s no criteria for evaluating religious exemptions. Each employer - and each agency - is left to figure out on their own how to review them.

 

[dgibbons]

But there’s no criteria for evaluating religious exemptions. Each employer - and each agency - is left to figure out on their own how to review them.

Care to link it?

 

[95coug]

Care to link it?

Item 2, pages 5-6 covers exemptions for state agencies, and charges each of them with providing exemptions but provides little guidance on what counts or how to evaluate them. That creates a lack of consistency across agencies.

There’s no way for an employer to determine who holds what beliefs or how sincerely, so the level of scrutiny will relate directly to how willing the agency is to face lawsuits. WSU doesn’t tolerate much legal risk.

.Order

 

[CougSinceBirth]

So will the warriors not pay him for home games? We are going to be dealing with some of that where I work.

Don't know for sure, but at the moment it sounds like he will have to forgo getting paid for any game he's unable to due to vaccination status.

 

[How_did_this_happen?]

Soon after WW1, Lone Star Dietz already in his mid 30s was put on trial in Spokane for "draft dodging" by the Wilson Administration.

Pandemic, commander in chief with diminished mental capacity, lap dog press.

Wilson...a horrific president....and our first "progressive" president. Beware the sons of pastors becoming president or those with PhDs.