You gonna make it from Yakima to Pullman for the big game tomorrow and the new fieldhouse ground-breaking?
Maybe you can remind Chun that he owes you a brick for your donation
Any guess on what our "legal damages" are...
- Thread starter ttowncoug
- Start date
You gonna make it from Yakima to Pullman for the big game tomorrow and the new fieldhouse ground-breaking?
Maybe you can remind Chun that he owes you a brick for your donation
I don’t UW athletics owes WSU athletics just like WSU doesn’t owe UW anything and that’s one of the reasons I want the Apple Cup to end. However I do think you are here to rub salt in our wounds and that is something I would expect from a husky fan.
I didn’t see that it was defined in the bylaws…which will be one of the things a court has to interpret.
EDIT: did another quick review, and still don’t see a definition. However, in several situations described, the bylaws prefer “informal” processes and communications, at least for a first step. If things can’t be resolved informally, they move to written/formal documentation. So there’s an argument there that no formal notification of withdrawal is required.
Also, in the section discussing dispute resolution - in the event of something significant that involves the whole conference, the commissioner is directed to call a meeting of all members. So Kliavkoff can definitely argue that he’s following the bylaws in trying to have a meeting of the 12. I would argue that this section is trumped by the ‘once you deliver notice, you aren’t a member anymore’ section. But, again…to be determined by the court.
Last edited:
That’s exactly how people get fat Loyal. Rub some dirt on it, take a swig of whisky and pick your ass up
Similar threads
