In Leach's defense, yes, he was using the leverage of other offers in order to receive raises. But Texas Tech had challenged him on this issue and told him to do so. 'Fine, go see what you can get somewhere else.' So he did and to their surprise came back with offers essentially consistent with his request. Hoist by their own petard. Tech's administration was in denial regarding the expected income of a coach of Leach's stature. He asked for increased compensation on an annual basis late in his term in Lubbock because his success was increasing on the same annual basis. His salary requests were not excessive but only market value for someone with his resume.
Hopefully, if this comes to fruition in Pullman, we will be able to keep pace monetarily. But if, as man2 has posted, Baylor goes all Don Vito on him and that is overwhelmingly important to him then we are screwed.
There's no doubt that the Texas Tech situation was poisonous from the administration side. The argument about the annual raises based on performance has some merit as well. Still, let's say that we see the following records at WSU in the next six years:
2016: 8-5
2017: 10-3
2018: 8-5
2019: 9-4
2020: 11-2
2021: 8-4
Without a doubt, if we see that kind of winning at WSU, we will all agree that Leach has done a great job. No coach in WSU history would be able to compare themselves to that and not feel a bit jealous. FWIW, that is essentially what he did in his last six years at Tech. Now, think about if we see the following salary negotiations at the end of each as a result of that success and interest from other schools:
2016: $3,000,000 ($250,000 raise)
2017: $3,500,000 (lots of interest in Leach)
2018: status quo
2019: $4,000,000 (interest again)
2020: $5,000,000 (lots of interest)
Looking at the above, Leach's salary wouldn't be out of line with the rest of the college coaching world's salaries. I have no doubt that $5,000,000 could be a fairly run of the mill salary for a top tier coach. However, when you think about the fatigue of these annual conversations about Leach leaving, coupled with a huge increase in salary, and the natural tendency for people to lose perspective, that 8-4 regular season in 2021 would have a lot of people pissed off and feeling like they'd been taken for a ride. Tech never played for a Big 12 title under Leach and was close one time. If we were in the same shoes, I can imagine plenty of fans wondering if the stress was worth it, particularly when you remember that when Leach was at Tech, he had a tendency to lose one game a year that he had no business losing.
As I said above, I do hope that Leach and Moos keep an open door to each other and are honest about where he "needs" to be. We don't want to lose Leach out of cheapness, but trying to outbid the world is a fool's play on our part. If Leach has the above results, we would be fools to not be paying at least $4 million per year though.