Didn't like the Wulff hire and didn't like the Rolo hire. Wanted to be wrong on both...badly. Hopefully the university learns from its mistakes...
Well, brand y have said they were wrong, and don't want to repeat the same mistake.Don't you think it odd there was never a column or editorial calling for him to be fired?
Only one of the last 5 coaches to never face pressure from the media.
The guy leading the charge at Brand Y wrote a 4 part love letter to him and concluded WSU couldn't afford to fire him.
Now, "it doesn't matter what it costs, fire Rolo"
Get a woke alum staff, run the ball, tweet about microbrews, dogs and macaroni recipes and let WSU football begin its inevitable decline into Vandaldom.
The Wulff era was the sneak preview
Bullsh**, at the time supporting Wulff until the end was good for their personal brand as "emerging journalists". And not backing an alum coach was an added risk.Well, brand y have said they were wrong, and don't want to repeat the same mistake.
Good points. I wasn't entirely sold on Rolovich, but he checked a lot of boxes and when looking at Chun's process and who was available, the hire was lauded by just about everyone.So many of our fans have a myopic view of our program relative to the other college football programs out there. For a group who rarely open their wallets, Cougs are among the best at condemning the University for making "bad hires."
Have you looked around the college football landscape? How does USC keep making bad hires? UW's had their share. The Beavs, Stanford, Cal, Colorado, ASU, Arizona, UCLA. Have you looked at their hiring records over the past 20 years? Shift that to the national programs. Why can't Miami, Fla and Florida State figure it out? Tennessee? Michigan? Texas?
Was Rolo a bad hire or did we learn things after the fact that no AD could have possibly considered (COVID)? I mean, he was widely endorsed by the West coast and even National media. The Wulff hire was lazy and small time, but Rolo was going to land a bigger gig than Hawaii. I'm not going to crucify Chun for the circumstances surrounding Rolo's hire. It's been atypical to say the least.
Very true, but I look at WSU differently I guess. When the wheels come off our program, we crash to the basement hard and fast. On the other hand, over the past 40 years that I've been following the program, we've put together a lot of incredible seasons.Good points. I wasn't entirely sold on Rolovich, but he checked a lot of boxes and when looking at Chun's process and who was available, the hire was lauded by just about everyone.
Slightly different point but our fans--understandably since all fan bases do this--have that same general myopia regarding the significance of the program and the likelihood of achieving anything meaningful, especially over an extended period. They will dismiss places like Wake Forest, Rutgers, Kansas, Duke, and Oregon State as terrible P5 jobs that are nearly impossible to win at, but then expect WSU, which is worse-off than many of those programs in nearly all respects (no natural recruiting territory, can't recruit in its own state, not only broke but in debt, etc., with rivals able to poach coaches with money and better situations easily) to somehow pull off being a consistent double-digit winner.
It's much like when fans tick through the schedule at the beginning of the year and count the conference wins, penciling in wins against teams like Oregon State, Arizona, and Colorado. Well, guess what the fans of every other team do when looking at WSU?
None of this is to claim we shouldn't push for the AD doing everything possible to succeed and pushing for it to build a program with an identity of success, even across coaches and eras. It's nearly impossible in college football absent some kind of massive boost to revenues or other basis for changing the school's general position, though, even at schools that are better-situated. Even those several notches above WSU in the pecking order, and even a good amount of blue bloods, get things wrong and go through rough patches. Look at just about any program and you can find massive failures in the past 15-20 years, and in most cases more recently. Even Bama had Shula floundering around and failing while we had Doba coaching.
Over the last 25 years, we've won (2) conference titles and have been ranked in the top-10 multiple times. We've had #1 overall draft picks, Outland Trophy winners, National Coaches of the year, etc, etc, etc. During that timeframe, how many home games as WSU sold out? My guess is less than 20, and if we're talking legit sell outs (standing room only), I'm sure it's less than 10.Why is it the job of the fans/alums to bail out the university?
The attitude of the fans/alums reflects the leadership and vision of the school. People point the finger at fans/alums for not giving. Wtf has the school done in the past 100 years that leads you to believe they want to win? WSU screams “just enough” and “its ok to lose” but yet the fans are supposed to dig in and give until it hurts??? Gtfo. The SCHOOL doesnt dig in or spend until it hurts. But yet 100 years of alums are supposed to???
Tell you what…. for every league game WSU wins I will write a check for $250. You want my $? Win.
Why is it the job of the fans/alums to bail out the university?
The attitude of the fans/alums reflects the leadership and vision of the school. People point the finger at fans/alums for not giving. Wtf has the school done in the past 100 years that leads you to believe they want to win? WSU screams “just enough” and “its ok to lose” but yet the fans are supposed to dig in and give until it hurts??? Gtfo. The SCHOOL doesnt dig in or spend until it hurts. But yet 100 years of alums are supposed to???
Tell you what…. for every league game WSU wins I will write a check for $250. You want my $? Win.
"Yes. Mr. Biggs.....Why is it the job of the fans/alums to bail out the university?
The attitude of the fans/alums reflects the leadership and vision of the school. People point the finger at fans/alums for not giving. Wtf has the school done in the past 100 years that leads you to believe they want to win? WSU screams “just enough” and “its ok to lose” but yet the fans are supposed to dig in and give until it hurts??? Gtfo. The SCHOOL doesnt dig in or spend until it hurts. But yet 100 years of alums are supposed to???
Tell you what…. for every league game WSU wins I will write a check for $250. You want my $? Win.
Yeah, gotta agree with you there. Was just reading his post today thinking the same thingDon't you think it odd there was never a column or editorial calling for him to be fired?
Only one of the last 5 coaches to never face pressure from the media.
The guy leading the charge at Brand Y wrote a 4 part love letter to him and concluded WSU couldn't afford to fire him.
Now, "it doesn't matter what it costs, fire Rolo"
Get a woke alum staff, run the ball, tweet about microbrews, dogs and macaroni recipes and let WSU football begin its inevitable decline into Vandaldom.
The Wulff era was the sneak preview
Over the last 25 years, we've won (2) conference titles and have been ranked in the top-10 multiple times. We've had #1 overall draft picks, Outland Trophy winners, National Coaches of the year, etc, etc, etc. During that timeframe, how many home games as WSU sold out? My guess is less than 20, and if we're talking legit sell outs (standing room only), I'm sure it's less than 10.
The attitude of our fans, relative to how our football team has performed over the past several decades, is a joke, honestly. You say that WSU screams "just enough," but what does it say when we can't fill the stadium for USC? Or we can't sell out games vs. freaking Idaho who are located 8 miles away? Or Labor Day games "just never draw well." Or the weekend before Apple Cup just "don't draw well." Or consecutive home games are "always a problem." The excuses that we make for our fan base not showing up meander longer than the snake river.
If you're asking what's worse, our football program or or our fans, it's not even close. Our fans suck.
You cant spend 100 years not giving a shit and then all of a sudden have it change. For WSU to fill the stadium consistently they need a consistent winner…. for years. Not a few years. Not 10 years good and 10 years bad. They need a good team, consistently, for years.
You can say the fans suck…. how much better is WSU??? It isnt going to change in a year or two. WSU has spent so many decades not caring, are you surprised fans dont care either??? Im not.
What message does WSU send about how much it wants to win when it won’t fire a coach that is awful right away? What message does WSU send about how committed it is to winning when it won’t fire a coach that gets beat like a drum?
If WSU wants fans and alums that care, it needs to care. Sadly, the university has prob burned up the leads of its older alums. They’ve spent so many years watching bad football they arent investing their $ in something that gives 0 return in excitement, pride and joy.
Actually I do not think it is odd for numerous reasons. Do you still wear bell bottom jeans? Platform shoes? You continue to think the world is static. Nothing changed since 2008-2011, and the "fairness complaint" is no longer in play.Don't you think it odd there was never a column or editorial calling for him to be fired?
Only one of the last 5 coaches to never face pressure from the media.
The guy leading the charge at Brand Y wrote a 4 part love letter to him and concluded WSU couldn't afford to fire him.
Now, "it doesn't matter what it costs, fire Rolo"
Get a woke alum staff, run the ball, tweet about microbrews, dogs and macaroni recipes and let WSU football begin its inevitable decline into Vandaldom.
The Wulff era was the sneak preview
Umm, what?Actually I do not for numerous reasons. Do you still wear bell bottom jeans? Platform shoes?
So in order for him to not suck as a fan, he has to donate?I think we can definitively that you suck as a fan. You're long on complaints and do nothing to support the Athletic Department.
Yes, if you have the financial means to donate, but you choose not to, you suck as a fan.So in order for him to not suck as a fan, he has to donate?
I haven't donated a single dollar to a Schulz and Chun university and AD. I don't like the way they've lead the university. I'm holding them accountable by not donating - if that makes me a "bandwagon" fan, then so be it.
Would you rather me blindly go "Hey Pat Chun, here's XYZ dollars to spend on something I don't trust you'll use them correctly for."?
Yes, if you have the financial means to donate, but you choose not to, you suck as a fan.
So in order for him to not suck as a fan, he has to donate?
I haven't donated a single dollar to a Schulz and Chun university and AD. I don't like the way they've lead the university. I'm holding them accountable by not donating - if that makes me a "bandwagon" fan, then so be it.
Would you rather me blindly go "Hey Pat Chun, here's XYZ dollars to spend on something I don't trust you'll use them correctly for."?
FWIW, I had issues with Bill, too.It's ok. I donate now instead. And I felt the same way as you during the Moos years. Glad you helped pay for Ernie's debacle. Wasn't my job to give Bill money just so he could bless my Cougness either.
So far it's still a free country and give what you want to who you want and why you want. Or not.
Actually I do not think it is odd for numerous reasons. Do you still wear bell bottom jeans? Platform shoes? You continue to think the world is static. Nothing changed since 2008-2011, and the "fairness complaint" is no longer in play.Umm, what?
FWIW, I had issues with Bill, too.
Dennis Erickson took everybody to Miami except Tom Everson and Tim Lappano and Lappano stayed with WSU and Price this go around.Actually I do not think it is odd for numerous reasons. Do you still wear bell bottom jeans? Platform shoes? You continue to think the world is static. Nothing changed since 2008-2011, and the "fairness complaint" is no longer in play.
Take the really good coaches...they aren't loyal. Chip Kelly got rid of Robin Pflugrad, Dennis didn't take half his staff to Miami.
How about once, maybe even twice. Or buy a (that's singular) ticket. Or, maybe don't constantly bitch about WSU not doing enough to get his hard earned money that he has no real intent to ever send WSU's way.So in order for him to not suck as a fan, he has to donate?
I haven't donated a single dollar to a Schulz and Chun university and AD. I don't like the way they've lead the university. I'm holding them accountable by not donating - if that makes me a "bandwagon" fan, then so be it.
Would you rather me blindly go "Hey Pat Chun, here's XYZ dollars to spend on something I don't trust you'll use them correctly for."?
Name a "customer" that gets to come into the business and bitch and moan about the business and never spend a nickel, without getting removed from the premises.Name a business where you can perform poorly and offer a poor product and blame the customer for not buying.
PoliticsName a business where you can perform poorly and offer a poor product and blame the customer for not buying.
K-12hahahahahahaha yes.
Ok, is there another???
No.Another fun name to throw into the ring: Bronco Mendenhall
Peace in our time!Yeah, gotta agree with you there. Was just reading his post today thinking the same thing
JN is a blowhard.
I don’t know. He’s just kind of a meh hire. BYU got better after he left. He started out great at Virginia, but now he’s 32-34.Why no? He has done well.
Thats funny. Talent is never coming to WSU when an unproven coach is at the helm. Even then it's a hard sell.Coach Nick Rolovich has two OL recruits coming in the 2022 Class' He's doing a decent job picking up lineman but he has too recruit better talent. No excuses why we are not getting Top 30 classes with the winning culture Coach Leach established! Go Cougs!
I don’t know. He’s just kind of a meh hire. BYU got better after he left. He started out great at Virginia, but now he’s 32-34.
Wouldn’t be a bad hire, but nothing special either. He’s also not leaving Virginia for Pullman.
Yes. Why would anyone realistically expect anything other than sparsely random success at schools like ours no matter who you hire in any athletic department position. Schools like WSU simple don't have and never will have the things that are required to expect any consistent level of success. Competence is the only reasonable expectation.Good points. I wasn't entirely sold on Rolovich, but he checked a lot of boxes and when looking at Chun's process and who was available, the hire was lauded by just about everyone.
Slightly different point but our fans--understandably since all fan bases do this--have that same general myopia regarding the significance of the program and the likelihood of achieving anything meaningful, especially over an extended period. They will dismiss places like Wake Forest, Rutgers, Kansas, Duke, and Oregon State as terrible P5 jobs that are nearly impossible to win at, but then expect WSU, which is worse-off than many of those programs in nearly all respects (no natural recruiting territory, can't recruit in its own state, not only broke but in debt, etc., with rivals able to poach coaches with money and better situations easily) to somehow pull off being a consistent double-digit winner.
It's much like when fans tick through the schedule at the beginning of the year and count the conference wins, penciling in wins against teams like Oregon State, Arizona, and Colorado. Well, guess what the fans of every other team do when looking at WSU?
None of this is to claim we shouldn't push for the AD doing everything possible to succeed and pushing for it to build a program with an identity of success, even across coaches and eras. It's nearly impossible in college football absent some kind of massive boost to revenues or other basis for changing the school's general position, though, even at schools that are better-situated. Even those several notches above WSU in the pecking order, and even a good amount of blue bloods, get things wrong and go through rough patches. Look at just about any program and you can find massive failures in the past 15-20 years, and in most cases more recently. Even Bama had Shula floundering around and failing while we had Doba coaching.
None of that is gonna change WSUs station though. All that would do is make you feel better about the experience of going to games and watching us lose. They could sell out every game for 50 years and it won't change one dam thing. And all those great seasons you mentioned, nobody outside of our fanbase remembers any of them. If you don't appeal to national college football fans in this age of CFB, you're out. PERIODOver the last 25 years, we've won (2) conference titles and have been ranked in the top-10 multiple times. We've had #1 overall draft picks, Outland Trophy winners, National Coaches of the year, etc, etc, etc. During that timeframe, how many home games as WSU sold out? My guess is less than 20, and if we're talking legit sell outs (standing room only), I'm sure it's less than 10.
The attitude of our fans, relative to how our football team has performed over the past several decades, is a joke, honestly. You say that WSU screams "just enough," but what does it say when we can't fill the stadium for USC? Or we can't sell out games vs. freaking Idaho who are located 8 miles away? Or Labor Day games "just never draw well." Or the weekend before Apple Cup just "don't draw well." Or consecutive home games are "always a problem." The excuses that we make for our fan base not showing up meander longer than the snake river.
If you're asking what's worse, our football program or or our fans, it's not even close. Our fans suck.