ADVERTISEMENT

Is Rolovich finally in our rear view mirror forever

"Stopping the spread was immaterial to the emergency use authorization. If you don't know what immaterial or other words mean use the internet to look up the definitions. "...

Oh thanks for the clarification. When I said the data showed the vaccine successful in preventing the the spread, you responded the authorization didn't require that data. I even asked for clarification. So you agree they had positive data on preventing the spread of 19.... so my statement was accurate and you agree. Glad we are on the same page.

And your big brother, and smarter brother Chat GBT disagrees with your timeline. December 20, 2020 is when they first started to administer the vaccines. Of course went to the elderly first. I was not in that category and got my first vax in March 2021. According to Chat, mid 2021 is when 19 mutated to Delta. Do you agree with Chat?

As I said there was a small window.

BTW what propaganda? You know who I listened to...a friend. Way smarter than you on the subject. Told me what to expect in 4/2020, when to take the drug and which one. And the history not only of covid but other pandemics and endemics. Now, he is a subject matter expert. I would never ask him about bankruptcy for example. I would go to a subject matter expert like you or Donald Trump.

"The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, first identified in India in October 2020 (1), became the dominant variant in >130 countries worldwide during June–November 2021 (2)." That's from CDC.



What was the window, how many shots were available during the window, and was this window worldwide, or just in the USA? How were millions or billions of people going to be vaccinated during that window? I really want to know how CougEd, eminent epidemiologist, was going to stop the spread. FWIW, I will repeat what I already posted, stopping the spread was immaterial to the emergency use authorization.

Here is some of the propaganda-
 
Last edited:
I was eligible for PPP money and refused it. That’s just me.
So did two of my niece's husbands. Their choice. My only comment to them was that they would be paying taxes for the stimulus program for the rest of their lives (they are both mid-30's) but did not get anything from it. Sort of like a divorce when young kids are involved.
 
I know, let's get rid of it....Sell it to Russia. I have always said, let the Republicans run the big cities and let the dems run the states. Mississippi, Alabama, WVa, S Carolina, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kentucky, Oklahoma (New Mexico...they are the outlier)...notice a pattern. The 9 poorest and most illiterate states in the country.
"The 9 poorest and most illiterate states in the country."

You know why, don't you? Don't make me tell you what you should know by now. Hint: The big cities are another clue.

Think, Ed.
 
Last edited:
Hmmmm.... let me put on my feminine cap and see if I can connect the dots for you

Lower GDP means the economy is faltering, that people aren't buying goods and services. When people shelter in place whether on their own or mandated they are not spending money, and when that happens businesses go out of business, people lose jobs etc.

Our government, Donald Trump came out with PPP money to keep money through the system, people spent like no tomorrow, keeping our economy afloat.

I know of one industry that had their best three year run, profits at their highest level and got so much PPP money they are buying planes, 10 million dollar houses etc.

Then there was a client who had to always buy drinks for everyone after golf. 50k in credit card debt. Got 100k in PPP money , paid off his credit card and had 50k to put down on a new construction.

I know that is stimulus. That debt somehow goes in different bucket and somehow we don't need to pay it back .
So the children can go the Hell in your feminist world, because its all about GDP growth (I was specifically addressing Sweden vs Norway during covid, which you brought up).

By the way, do you know what is included in GDP, Ed?
 
"The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, first identified in India in October 2020 (1), became the dominant variant in >130 countries worldwide during June–November 2021 (2)." That's from CDC.



What was the window, how many shots were available during the window, and was this window worldwide, or just in the USA? How were millions or billions of people going to be vaccinated during that window? I really want to know how CougEd, eminent epidemiologist, was going to stop the spread. FWIW, I will repeat what I already posted, stopping the spread was immaterial to the emergency use authorization.

Here is some of the propaganda-
So you agree the covid 19 vaccine had data showing it helped prevent the transmission of covid 19.

That was the comment I made you appeared to say something different about the original data.

Glad we are now on the same page.
 
So the children can go the Hell in your feminist world, because its all about GDP growth (I was specifically addressing Sweden vs Norway during covid, which you brought up).

By the way, do you know what is included in GDP, Ed?
My feminist world? Hmmm .

The children ? Going to "hell" . Another hmmm.

I thought we were talking about jobs and how people lost them . But I am sure we can go down your tangent
 
My feminist world? Hmmm .

The children ? Going to "hell" . Another hmmm.

I thought we were talking about jobs and how people lost them . But I am sure we can go down your tangent
No. We were talking about countries' actions during covid. Try to stay focused, ma'am. 😆
 
My feminist world? Hmmm .

The children ? Going to "hell" . Another hmmm.

I thought we were talking about jobs and how people lost them . But I am sure we can go down your tangent
You live and work in the Seattle metro area, no? (Reference to "feminist world" so you don't get confused.)

You vote for the Female Party (aka Dems) no matter how corrupt and dishonest they are, right? To remind you, this is the party that despises masculinity...
 
So you agree the covid 19 vaccine had data showing it helped prevent the transmission of covid 19.

That was the comment I made you appeared to say something different about the original data.

Glad we are now on the same page.
And the response of everyone (except you perhaps) to that is, so what? It's immaterial even if true. The 2024 flu vaccine might have helped stop the spread of influenza in 2023. Now be a big boy and get to work:

What was the window, how many shots were available during the window, and was this window worldwide, or just in the USA? How were millions or billions of people going to be vaccinated during that window? I really want to know how CougEd, eminent epidemiologist, was going to stop the spread.
 
My feminist world? Hmmm .

The children ? Going to "hell" . Another hmmm.

I thought we were talking about jobs and how people lost them . But I am sure we can go down your tangent
Actually you were whining about people getting PPP and you not getting any of the government cheese, and you were spewing misinformation about stopping the spread.
 
"The 9 poorest and most illiterate states in the country."

You know why, don't you? Don't make me tell you what you should know by now. Hint: The big cities are another clue.

Think, Ed.
No
You live and work in the Seattle metro area, no? (Reference to "feminist world" so you don't get confused.)

You vote for the Female Party (aka Dems) no matter how corrupt and dishonest they are, right? To remind you, this is the party that despises masculinity...
Oh...I guess at this point since your convo has gone off the rails, you will have to tell me what I despise?

Yes, we were talking about Norway and Sweden...and the data shows the country who wasn't quarantined had a worse performing economy than the one that does, so it would stand to reason workers chose not to subject themselves to an environment that put themselves, their family and friends and strangers at a potential risk.

Didn't know my friend who and others who voted for Trump and did solely based on tax cuts were feminists. But nice you threw them into the caldron.
 
Actually you were whining about people getting PPP and you not getting any of the government cheese, and you were spewing misinformation about stopping the spread.
Blithers....not whining about people getting free government handouts...simply making an observation about the people who accepted them and then somehow think they aren't handouts and somehow go into a different accounting bucket on the national debt.

Why would I want government cheese...we made great money during covid...
 
Blithers....not whining about people getting free government handouts...simply making an observation about the people who accepted them and then somehow think they aren't handouts and somehow go into a different accounting bucket on the national debt.

Why would I want government cheese...we made great money during covid...
And the response of everyone (except you perhaps) to that is, so what? It's immaterial even if true. The 2024 flu vaccine might have helped stop the spread of influenza in 2023. Now be a big boy and get to work:

What was the window, how many shots were available during the window, and was this window worldwide, or just in the USA? How were millions or billions of people going to be vaccinated during that window? I really want to know how CougEd, eminent epidemiologist, was going to stop the spread.
Again blithers...it was a comment countering that there was no data founded that stopped the spread of 19. You seem to have made the same claim but, now tell me there was data that supported the original shot was effective against 19.

Again, glad we are on the same page on that comment.
 
"The 9 poorest and most illiterate states in the country."

You know why, don't you? Don't make me tell you what you should know by now. Hint: The big cities are another clue.

Think, Ed.
Ummm...not sure how big cities explains the lack of education. And it certainly doesn't explain the disparity in income. Maybe as a self proclaimed masculine man you could connect the doubts for this flower in the NW. Actually getting man up lessons right now in S Carolina.
 
Again blithers...it was a comment countering that there was no data founded that stopped the spread of 19. You seem to have made the same claim but, now tell me there was data that supported the original shot was effective against 19.

Again, glad we are on the same page on that comment.
Your reading comprehension remains terrible.

Why are you spreading misinformation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UberCougars
Blithers....not whining about people getting free government handouts...simply making an observation about the people who accepted them and then somehow think they aren't handouts and somehow go into a different accounting bucket on the national debt.

Why would I want government cheese...we made great money during covid...
You're whining. Everyone knows you're whining. You're such a whiner you won't even report people that you claim abused PPP.
 
And the response of everyone (except you perhaps) to that is, so what? It's immaterial even if true. The 2024 flu vaccine might have helped stop the spread of influenza in 2023. Now be a big boy and get to work:

What was the window, how many shots were available during the window, and was this window worldwide, or just in the USA? How were millions or billions of people going to be vaccinated during that window? I really want to know how CougEd, eminent epidemiologist, was going to stop the spread.

Your reading comprehension remains terrible.

Why are you spreading misinformation?
I am only parroting your bigger and smarter brother Chat GBT. I think your issue is with chat GBT. It was said the original 19 vaccine was lied about and there was not data showing it was effective in stopping the spread of 19. They had data in their studies. You changed the argument is that because it mutates and the new variant was coming on shore that data didn't exist?

Delta did not become the dominate variant in US until July 2021. Do you agree?
 
You're whining. Everyone knows you're whining. You're such a whiner you won't even report people that you claim abused PPP.
Dblithers on...if I say a poster is a douche bag for example, am I whining or making an observation? See, I would see that as an observation. The people who got millions and more, they have their paperwork in order. It is Trump, Biden, and every congressman and woman's responsibility to put up guard rails, have developed a mechanism for a pay back, and how to enforce it. They didn't. If people don't care about the national debt, why at this point do I care.
 
Dblithers on...if I say a poster is a douche bag for example, am I whining or making an observation? See, I would see that as an observation. The people who got millions and more, they have their paperwork in order. It is Trump, Biden, and every congressman and woman's responsibility to put up guard rails, have developed a mechanism for a pay back, and how to enforce it. They didn't. If people don't care about the national debt, why at this point do I care.
If you say as often as you have that someone has abused PPP, and do nothing about it, you're whining. This is about you, not Biden, Trump or anyone else.
 
I am only parroting your bigger and smarter brother Chat GBT. I think your issue is with chat GBT. It was said the original 19 vaccine was lied about and there was not data showing it was effective in stopping the spread of 19. They had data in their studies. You changed the argument is that because it mutates and the new variant was coming on shore that data didn't exist?

Delta did not become the dominate variant in US until July 2021. Do you agree?
You're not answering questions posed to you and continue to spread misinformation.

The ultimate CougEdism here is you keep referring to Chat GBT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UberCougars
You're not answering questions posed to you and continue to spread misinformation.

The ultimate CougEdism here is you keep referring to Chat GBT.
I have answered the question originally posted ... that a claim was made the original vaccine did not work to stop the spread of original covid 19 .

You jumped in and implied that there was no data that supported it because it was an emergency authorization. Your brother chat gbt disagrees with you.
 
I have answered the question originally posted ... that a claim was made the original vaccine did not work to stop the spread of original covid 19 .

You jumped in and implied that there was no data that supported it because it was an emergency authorization. Your brother chat gbt disagrees with you.
Making things up doesn’t help whatever argument you’re trying to make.

Tell us about the window Dr. Ed.
 
I have answered the question originally posted ... that a claim was made the original vaccine did not work to stop the spread of original covid 19 .

You jumped in and implied that there was no data that supported it because it was an emergency authorization. Your brother chat gbt disagrees with you.
Both chat gbt and the so called fact checkers should be looked at with large amounts of skepticism.
 
Both chat gbt and the so called fact checkers should be looked at with large amounts of skepticism.
Understood. So are you saying as well the data was tainted on the original covid 19? So should we be skeptical on every trial for every drug?

Where do we get the real info. I would not think Trumps admin would have people lie about the data ?
 
Both chat gbt and the so called fact checkers should be looked at with large amounts of skepticism.
"fact checkers', for sure. It's a money game for them.

AI is still up in the air. Probably safe to assume biases are built in similar to search engines. Use more than one - maybe ChatGPT, Pilot and Grok.

Edit: I actually think Pilot is joined at the hip with ChatGPT but am too lazy/late in the day to look that up.
 
"fact checkers', for sure. It's a money game for them.

AI is still up in the air. Probably safe to assume biases are built in similar to search engines. Use more than one - maybe ChatGPT, Pilot and Grok.

Edit: I actually think Pilot is joined at the hip with ChatGPT but am too lazy/late in the day to look that up.
Snowflake.

You would have to both demonstrate that "fact-checkers" are biased against your idealogy as well as AI, presumably from some sort of insecurity/persecution complex.

I mean...NOT YOU specifically, but everyone else claiming exactly that. Taihtsat
 
Snowflake.

You would have to both demonstrate that "fact-checkers" are biased against your idealogy as well as AI, presumably from some sort of insecurity/persecution complex.

I mean...NOT YOU specifically, but everyone else claiming exactly that. Taihtsat
Gotta listen to Zuck's interview on Rogan first.

And go to dinner now.
 
"fact checkers', for sure. It's a money game for them.

AI is still up in the air. Probably safe to assume biases are built in similar to search engines. Use more than one - maybe ChatGPT, Pilot and Grok.

Edit: I actually think Pilot is joined at the hip with ChatGPT but am too lazy/late in the day to look that up.
AI generates information based on number of mentions, without much regard for the reliability of the source. It’s basically rapid crowdsourcing of information, and the digital expression of “if I say it enough times, it becomes true.”

It’s pretty much the same as picking your news articles based on the number of views and retweets. Sadly, some people think that’s valid.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT