ADVERTISEMENT

Sounds Like Chun And Schulz have given up!

In that arms race, did it accomplish anything? We out spent everyone but Cal, and we continued to have bottom wrung recruiting. Cal continued to struggle. Now imagine the alternative. Modest upgrades, kinda like UCLA and USC, with emphasis on liquidity to meet the demands of coaching payrolls. Leach with a war chest to help fight off raiders for assistants. We overspent spent on facilities and then hamstrung Leach's ability to retain staff with the lowest payroll budget in the conference.

Think about it.

Administrators love building monuments to themselves, but hate paying for coaching even though coaching is far more important to success.
Sure, we built what we built, and recruiting had a modest improvement at best. More likely stayed flat.

If we hadn’t built it, does recruiting dip? Probably.

Comparing our facilities and situation to SC and UCLA isnt really a good comparison. They were starting from a higher level and with other advantages.
 
If you don't think those conversations were happening while negotiating, you're kidding yourself.

How long has Chun been here? 2017? Isn't he supposed to be the dynamic fundraiser? Yeah, oh wait, he's been in Pullman 6+ years and done jack.
Stop the fan club mind set, the Moos is "my guy" nonsense for a minute and read my initial post. Moos put us in a deep hole financially (fact) then Chun did jack all to get us out (fact) -- end to story. To entirely different forms of failing the Cougar nation. That is what happened.

The best thing done in recent memory in Cougar athletics was Moos' hiring of Leach. Moos failed thereafter by building stuff we couldn't remotely afford, hamstringing Leach's ability to hire and retain staff, with the lowest payroll budget in the conference. Imagine Leach with at least some ability to maintain staff continuity, it could have made the all difference. More modesty on the building end could have accomplished that.
 
Schultz and Crow at ASU are the main reasons we had LARRY SCOTT for so long. Pac 12 network can be placed on Schultz' sweater vest shoulders. He loved the equal revenue concept. It ran off USC and UCLA and started this entire debacle. Schultz and Chun both need to go.
Don't forget Elson Floyd as Chair of the Pac-12 CEO group, secured Larry's extension and promotion in 2013, amid the growing discontent due to the revenue short fall. Larry was at Floyd's memorial, and was a speaker. Why wouldn't he, Floyd made Larry a very rich man.

Circa 2012

Scott also was named the executive chairman of Pac-12 Enterprises.

"Larry's leadership and vision is critical as we realize our tremendous potential as a Conference built on a firm foundation of academic excellence and superior athletic achievement," said WSU President Elson S. Floyd, who is chair of the Pac-12 CEO Group. "Pac-12 Enterprises will continue to provide exposure to our athletic programs, student-athletes in all sports, and world-renowned academic programs, as well as deliver long-term financial value for our institutions to help fulfill our core academic missions."


Geez, Floyd followed by Schulz, god who is making our hiring decisions?
 
Stop the fan club mind set, the Moos is "my guy" nonsense for a minute and read my initial post. Moos put us in a deep hole financially (fact) then Chun did jack all to get us out (fact) -- end to story. To entirely different forms of failing the Cougar nation. That is what happened.

The best thing done in recent memory in Cougar athletics was Moos' hiring of Leach. Moos failed thereafter by building stuff we couldn't remotely afford, hamstringing Leach's ability to hire and retain staff, with the lowest payroll budget in the conference. Imagine Leach with at least some ability to maintain staff continuity, it could have made the all difference. More modesty on the building end could have accomplished that.
There's no fan club. I'm strictly pointing out that blaming Floyd and Moos for failures of those many, many years before them and those directly after them have failed. At least they did something. Moos and Floyd have their faults too, sure, they spent a lot but had those before them actually done any maintenance or helpful updates those two wouldn't have to overcompensate and sell a program coming off 6-40. Yes I recognize Moos was apart of the hiring committee for Wulff, too -- he's not perfect, but I'll take the worst of Moos over the best of Chun.

At least Floyd and Moos gave a sh*t about football and athletics. Meanwhile, Schulz and Chun have singlehandedly driven me away from WSU since 2017, and currently aren't showing me anything to remedy that.
 
Don't forget Elson Floyd as Chair of the Pac-12 CEO group, secured Larry's extension and promotion in 2013, amid the growing discontent due to the revenue short fall. Larry was at Floyd's memorial, and was a speaker. Why wouldn't he, Floyd made Larry a very rich man.

Circa 2012

Scott also was named the executive chairman of Pac-12 Enterprises.

"Larry's leadership and vision is critical as we realize our tremendous potential as a Conference built on a firm foundation of academic excellence and superior athletic achievement," said WSU President Elson S. Floyd, who is chair of the Pac-12 CEO Group. "Pac-12 Enterprises will continue to provide exposure to our athletic programs, student-athletes in all sports, and world-renowned academic programs, as well as deliver long-term financial value for our institutions to help fulfill our core academic missions."


Geez, Floyd followed by Schulz, god who is making our hiring decisions?
Thank you for posting this, I thought I heard something like this. Nobody’s perfect, Floyd was a good man and great ambassador for WSU, and left a mostly positive legacy. This points to me more of what a swindler and grifter Larry Scott must have been to garner his support.
 
There's no fan club. I'm strictly pointing out that blaming Floyd and Moos for failures of those many, many years before them and those directly after them have failed. At least they did something. Moos and Floyd have their faults too, sure, they spent a lot but had those before them actually done any maintenance or helpful updates those two wouldn't have to overcompensate and sell a program coming off 6-40. Yes I recognize Moos was apart of the hiring committee for Wulff, too -- he's not perfect, but I'll take the worst of Moos over the best of Chun.

At least Floyd and Moos gave a sh*t about football and athletics. Meanwhile, Schulz and Chun have singlehandedly driven me away from WSU since 2017, and currently aren't showing me anything to remedy that.

Are people who complained about Mr. Moos' spending habits the same folks who were ready for Mike Leach to leave Pullman after he "flirted" with Tennessee after going in 19-8 in the Pac-12 from 2015-17?

Do us fans expect state of the art facilities to happen on the cheap or coaches not to leverage job opportunities to better their own situations?

Isn't there a price that must be paid to compete successfully in big-time college football? 🤷‍♂️
 
Leach never comes to WSU without the facilities improvements.
Utter myth, not reality. Check the timelines on construction approvals for yourselves and the old articles about Leach being unable to find work. Then have the balls to admit you bought into this stupid myth. This claim is right up there with "Doba left the cupboard bare," Its agenda driven, revisionism, unsupported by actual facts.

Start with this:


At the time of this article there had been 21 FBS openings since Leach was canned, only 1 school even gave the man an f-ing interview, and they decided on Randy Edsall, 74-70 at UConn instead (sounds like they were being polite to Leach). And get this, it was another year before Moos came calling.

Sure Leach, only 50 at the time, had options, two to be precise, WSU or retirement!
 
  • Like
Reactions: longtimecoug
Utter myth, not reality. Check the timelines on construction approvals for yourselves and the old articles about Leach being unable to find work. Then have the balls to admit you bought into this stupid myth. This claim is right up there with "Doba left the cupboard bare," Its agenda driven, revisionism, unsupported by actual facts.

Start with this:


At the time of this article there had been 21 FBS openings since Leach was canned, only 1 school even gave the man an f-ing interview, and they decided on Randy Edsall, 74-70 at UConn instead (sounds like they were being polite to Leach). And get this, it was another year before Moos came calling.

Sure Leach, only 50 at the time, had options, two to be precise, WSU or retirement!
True story, good point on the doba left the cupboard bare analogy. It was far from bare
 
True story, good point on the doba left the cupboard bare analogy. It was far from bare
Don't get me wrong Leach was a great great hire and showed Moos' major cajones. He was putting his own job on the line by hiring a damaged goods, loose cannon, out of the wilderness. It could have gone very bad very quick with Leach's meanderings at the mic, here on the left coast. I'm also sure Moos told him of his plan to build elite facilities to lure high end donors and 4 and 5 star recruits. Moos was making the pitch ever since the TV deal was inked. But the two had nothing to do with one another. It was a desperate school hiring a desperate coach on the one hand. And Moos' naive idea that if we simply built it, they would come, on the other.

When the Wulff hire went south right out of the blocks, the Admin had to come up with a cover story to shield itself from criticism and to buy Wulff time. Scapegoating Bill was that story. Likewise, when Moos' "build elite and they will come" proved to be a financial disaster/combined with no movement on the recruiting needle, they needed a cover story too. The "you have to accept the bad with the Leach good," tie in, was born. It didn't matter what the facts actually were.
 
Utter myth, not reality. Check the timelines on construction approvals for yourselves and the old articles about Leach being unable to find work. Then have the balls to admit you bought into this stupid myth. This claim is right up there with "Doba left the cupboard bare," Its agenda driven, revisionism, unsupported by actual facts.

Start with this:


At the time of this article there had been 21 FBS openings since Leach was canned, only 1 school even gave the man an f-ing interview, and they decided on Randy Edsall, 74-70 at UConn instead (sounds like they were being polite to Leach). And get this, it was another year before Moos came calling.

Sure Leach, only 50 at the time, had options, two to be precise, WSU or retirement!
Thanks for taking my mind off 2024 for a moment . Would you agree with me our best players on offense were are wr and c? And we had no defensive tackles and no qb experience .

And what young players did he have for the 09 season and beyond . Not sure Doba leaving the cupboard bare is that inaccurate
 
Don't get me wrong Leach was a great great hire and showed Moos' major cajones. He was putting his own job on the line by hiring a damaged goods, loose cannon, out of the wilderness. It could have gone very bad very quick with Leach's meanderings at the mic, here on the left coast. I'm also sure Moos told him of his plan to build elite facilities to lure high end donors and 4 and 5 star recruits. Moos was making the pitch since the TV deal was inked. But the two had nothing to do with one another. It was a desperate school hiring a desperate coach on the one hand. And Moos' naive idea that if we simply built it, they would come, on the other.

When the Wulff hire went south right out of the blocks, the Admin had to come up with a cover story to shield itself from criticism and to buy Wulff time. Scapegoating Bill was that story. Likewise, when Moos' "build elite and they will come" proved to be a financial disaster/combined with no movement on the recruiting needle, they needed a cover story too. The "you have to accept the bad with the Leach good," tie in, was born. It didn't matter the facts actually are.
Bill had responsibility in the wulff hire just as Floyd and Sterk . He was on the committee
 
Thanks for taking my mind off 2024 for a moment . Would you agree with me our best players on offense were are wr and c? And we had no defensive tackles and no qb experience .

And what young players did he have for the 09 season and beyond . Not sure Doba leaving the cupboard bare is that inaccurate
Sure there were senior holes to fill, aren't there always, but when you are returning 14 starters, mostly on defense. from a 5-7 team and your first Pac-12 game is the worst loss in school history, to date, 66-3 to F-ing Cal at home, the real story is how did this coach lose this team so completely, so quickly, not this historic loss was caused by the need to replace a seasoned QB and some receivers. I know you know that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: longtimecoug
Sure there were senior holes to fill, aren't there always, but when you are returning 14 starters, mostly on defense. from a 5-7 team and your first Pac-12 game is the worst loss in school history, to date, 66-3 to F-ing Cal at home, the real story is how did this coach lose this team so completely, so quickly, not this historic loss was caused by the need to replace a seasoned QB and some receivers. I know you know that.
Never ever will I forget walking out of the stadium that day, knowing we were in big trouble
 
Never ever will I forget walking out of the stadium that day, knowing we were in big trouble
I was simply too dumbfounded to think coherently. For future reference, we now know it is probably a head coach turning on and lashing out at his players because he can't accept any responsibilty himself for getting off to a rocky start. It is a one and done situation, a coach who isn't redeemable. You live and learn.
 
Sure there were senior holes to fill, aren't there always, but when you are returning 14 starters, mostly on defense. from a 5-7 team and your first Pac-12 game is the worst loss in school history, to date, 66-3 to F-ing Cal at home, the real story is how did this coach lose this team so completely, so quickly, not this historic loss was caused by the need to replace a seasoned QB and some receivers. I know you know that.
And up to that point how many winning records has WSU had with a QB that has had zero reps? Same way Leach lost 2012? Change is hard for players. Happened to Price in 1990.
 
I was simply too dumbfounded to think coherently. For future reference, we now know it is probably a head coach turning on and lashing out at his players because he can't accept any responsibilty himself for getting off to a rocky start. It is a one and done situation, a coach who isn't redeemable. You live and learn.
USC taking a knee beforehalftime when they were in scoring range had to be the worst.
 
Bill had responsibility in the wulff hire just as Floyd and Sterk . He was on the committee
I don't blame anyone for the Wulff hire, on paper it was strong, with a pedigree similar to past success, i.e. Price, Erickson. But if they had been alerted to Wulff's personality issues then that is a different story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: longtimecoug
And up to that point how many winning records has WSU had with a QB that has had zero reps? Same way Leach lost 2012? Change is hard for players. Happened to Price in 1990.
Pointing to a potential down season, but by far the worst team in school history, please!
 
  • Like
Reactions: longtimecoug
Pointing to a potential down season, but by far the worst team in school history, please!
Let me point to 1998...what if Chip Kelly was in the conference in 1996 and brought the no huddle, get plays off in 20 seconds. I am not sure who you think was a Pac 12 player at DT in 08. Or at DE. Michael Graise who put in 10 pounds in his entire career? Matt Eichlebarger? You wanna know why WSU was gashed for 66 against Cal...look at the first play of the game....Matt E was 10 yards in the secondary on his back.

You give a bunch of three and out with the no huddle on the other side you will see those scores.
 
I don't blame anyone for the Wulff hire, on paper it was strong, with a pedigree similar to past success, i.e. Price, Erickson. But if they had been alerted to Wulff's personality issues then that is a different story.
Didn't love the hire. Similar to Rolovich, it was a "I hope this works out" from me. Neither did.
 
I don't blame anyone for the Wulff hire, on paper it was strong, with a pedigree similar to past success, i.e. Price, Erickson. But if they had been alerted to Wulff's personality issues then that is a different story.
Wulff had no personality. He was an O line coach. He was a grinder. What more needed to be said...other than he and his staff developed a good eye for talent and just couldn't keep them in the fold. WSu under Wulff and Doba were playing the honor system...other coaches were playing to keep their job and until they sign on the dotted line they are free game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeteTheChop
Let me point to 1998...what if Chip Kelly was in the conference in 1996 and brought the no huddle, get plays off in 20 seconds. I am not sure who you think was a Pac 12 player at DT in 08. Or at DE. Michael Graise who put in 10 pounds in his entire career? Matt Eichlebarger? You wanna know why WSU was gashed for 66 against Cal...look at the first play of the game....Matt E was 10 yards in the secondary on his back.

You give a bunch of three and out with the no huddle on the other side you will see those scores.
Excuses excuses, no way the team should have been that bad it was wulff
 
Excuses excuses, no way the team should have been that bad it was wulff
Wulff sucked...doesn't change the fact Doba left the cupboard bare. How many games do you believe Doba would have won with that talent.
 
You still, after all these year cant see the difference between a hard fought 10 point loss and a 60 point white washing
I can . I said wulff sucked . Now tell me how many games Doba would win with the less than bare cupboard …

And no I don’t see it considerably worse than losing to an Utah team in 2012 that didn’t have a good qb 44-0 when the previous year we were 1 inch from beating them .

I don’t see a great deal of difference between losing to OSU or even Hawaii then getting shelled at byu .
 
Last edited:
I can . I said wulff sucked . Now tell me how many games Doba would win with the less than bare cupboard …

And no I don’t see it considerably worse than losing to an Utah team in 2012 that didn’t have a good qb 44-0 when the previous year we were 1 inch from beating them .

I don’t see a great deal of difference between losing to OSU or even Hawaii then getting shelled at byu .

Doba would have won 4,5,6,7 games that season with the semi half semi bare cupboard, that year.

The Lobster, Lopina, Rogers, etc, were semi good enough with Doba, that they would have won 4 to 7 games, instead of Wulf's 0-12, 1-11, 2-10,:3-9
 
Wulff had no personality. He was an O line coach. He was a grinder. What more needed to be said...other than he and his staff developed a good eye for talent and just couldn't keep them in the fold. WSu under Wulff and Doba were playing the honor system...other coaches were playing to keep their job and until they sign on the dotted line they are free game.
Ed, are you the last to know? Wulff had some major psych issues going on, later blamed on his tragic background!
Wulff sucked...doesn't change the fact Doba left the cupboard bare. How many games do you believe Doba would have won with that talent.
You keep saying that, but facts just don't back it up. Look at the depth chart on p. 58 of the 2008 media guide. (its on line). I was wrong, 9 starters on defense and 6 on offense, 4 OL (including long time NFL receiver Brandon Gibson and back up Chris Ivory, an NFL RB who ran for nearly 1300 yards with the Jets, more than 5000 in his career) and both kickers returned. 17 of 24 starters. Also throw in 2007 back up Jeshua Andresen, you know 4 time NCAA hurdle champ at WR and our returning QB was a 5th year senior, Gary Rogers. Holy crap you are holding on to the "cupboard was bare" nonsense like is it sacred religious dogma. WE were lied to!

To answer your question, 5 or 6 games. Hence the Doba problem, mediocrity. It also explains why Doba was shocked that he was let go!

How much more would be needed for you to admit the cupboard was pretty damn full?

The real question is how many games would Wulff win with the 2002 Cougs? 2 or 4?
 
I can . I said wulff sucked . Now tell me how many games Doba would win with the less than bare cupboard …

And no I don’t see it considerably worse than losing to an Utah team in 2012 that didn’t have a good qb 44-0 when the previous year we were 1 inch from beating them .

I don’t see a great deal of difference between losing to OSU or even Hawaii then getting shelled at byu .

Back to the Wulf APAULOGIST, vs Doba supposedly leaving cupboard bare, days, forum wars, poster stupidity, thought Tron, others had stomped, hashed that stupid stuff out.
 
Utter myth, not reality. Check the timelines on construction approvals for yourselves and the old articles about Leach being unable to find work. Then have the balls to admit you bought into this stupid myth. This claim is right up there with "Doba left the cupboard bare," Its agenda driven, revisionism, unsupported by actual facts.

Start with this:


At the time of this article there had been 21 FBS openings since Leach was canned, only 1 school even gave the man an f-ing interview, and they decided on Randy Edsall, 74-70 at UConn instead (sounds like they were being polite to Leach). And get this, it was another year before Moos came calling.

Sure Leach, only 50 at the time, had options, two to be precise, WSU or retirement!
You likely will regret going there with your tone.

Mike Leach agreed to terms with WSU on November 30, 2011.

The regents approved the stadium improvements on November 18, 2011.

What exactly would you have me "check [about] the timeline on construction approvals?" Be specific.

Further, citing an article from January 2011 with some anecdotes regarding searches at the time is not dispositive of anything ten months later. It sure as hell isn't when you're completely wrong about whatever point you thought you were making about construction timelines, yet thought you were a big shot trying to admonish me to "check the timelines." You may want to "have the balls" to look up the definition of irony on this one, champ.

How would you like to handle this ... apologize or just look like a moron suddenly going after me aggressively when I've always been reasonable with you and just about everyone else on here? I'm genuinely surprised. You should pick someone else to **** with next time.
 
Last edited:
I don't blame anyone for the Wulff hire, on paper it was strong, with a pedigree similar to past success, i.e. Price, Erickson.

Coach Walden insists to this day WSU was a bowl team under CPW in 2011 if Jeff Tuel had stayed healthy
 
Nothing like taking another bite of the stale old Doba/Wulff shit sandwich to distract from the new conference realignment shit sandwich.
 
You likely will regret going there with your tone.

Mike Leach agreed to terms with WSU on November 30, 2011.

The regents approved the stadium improvements on November 18, 2011.

What exactly would you have me "check [about] the timeline on construction approvals?" Be specific.

Further, citing an article from January 2011 with some anecdotes regarding searches at the time is not dispositive of anything ten months later. It sure as hell isn't when you're completely wrong about whatever point you thought you were making about construction timelines, yet thought you were a big shot trying to admonish me to "check the timelines." You may want to "have the balls" to look up the definition of irony on this one, champ.

How would you like to handle this ... apologize or just look like a moron suddenly going after me aggressively when I've always been reasonable with you and just about everyone else on here? I'm genuinely surprised. You should pick someone else to **** with next time.
I cite facts based on an as reputable a source as you get in the sports world, demonstrating that no one was interested in Leach, but us. Sports Illustrated: "Why Won't Anyone Hire Mike Leach," says it all. You cite jack all in response. I can cite several other less respected reports to this effect, and the fact he was unemployed for three years in his coaching prime, before us. Where is the evidence that we were battling anyone or any thing for Mike Leach's services during his 3 year long forced sabbatical? Ultimately you made the claim that, but for the facility upgrades, Leach wasn't coming. The burden is on you. If you don't have it, just admit it. Who else was offering Leach a job and how much?

You ignore the big dog in the facilities discussion, the FOB, because you know it runs contrary to your feigned indignation. Also, while the press box upgrade was approved shortly before Leach signed, I'm still waiting for even a scintilla of evidence tying it to Leach's decision to come here. Surely in your feigned righteous indignation you have tons of this evidence? My narrative, we offered a coach who generated no interest, elsewhere, over the proceeding 3 year, a great deal of money to coach, and he accepted without a facilities proviso remains unrefuted. We actually paid him 250k less, initially, than he was making at TT, three years earlier.

Show your evidence, not feigned indignation. Please!

In the legal business, the more someone blows the more you know he is full of crap!
 
  • Like
Reactions: longtimecoug
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT