Sure, we built what we built, and recruiting had a modest improvement at best. More likely stayed flat.In that arms race, did it accomplish anything? We out spent everyone but Cal, and we continued to have bottom wrung recruiting. Cal continued to struggle. Now imagine the alternative. Modest upgrades, kinda like UCLA and USC, with emphasis on liquidity to meet the demands of coaching payrolls. Leach with a war chest to help fight off raiders for assistants. We overspent spent on facilities and then hamstrung Leach's ability to retain staff with the lowest payroll budget in the conference.
Think about it.
Administrators love building monuments to themselves, but hate paying for coaching even though coaching is far more important to success.
If we hadn’t built it, does recruiting dip? Probably.
Comparing our facilities and situation to SC and UCLA isnt really a good comparison. They were starting from a higher level and with other advantages.