I cite facts based on an as reputable a source as you get in the sports world, demonstrating that no one was interested in Leach, but us. Sports Illustrated: "Why Won't Anyone Hire Mike Leach," says it all. You cite jack all in response. I can cite several other less respected reports to this effect, and the fact he was unemployed for three years in his coaching prime, before us. Where is the evidence that we were battling anyone or any thing for Mike Leach's services during his 3 year long forced sabbatical? Ultimately you made the claim that, but for the facility upgrades, Leach wasn't coming. The burden is on you. If you don't have it, just admit it. Who else was offering Leach a job and how much?
You ignore the big dog in the facilities discussion, the FOB, because you know it runs contrary to your feigned indignation. Also, while the press box upgrade was approved shortly before Leach signed, I'm still waiting for even a scintilla of evidence tying it to Leach's decision to come here. Surely in your feigned righteous indignation you have tons of this evidence? My narrative, we offered a coach who generated no interest, elsewhere, over the proceeding 3 year, a great deal of money to coach, and he accepted without a facilities proviso remains unrefuted. We actually paid him 250k less, initially, than he was making at TT, three years earlier.
Show your evidence, not feigned indignation. Please!
In the legal business, the more someone blows the more you know he is full of crap!
SoCal, what's your thoughts on what the adminstration could've done to keep CML from leaving after the 2019 season?