I think it's really tough to gauge their overall consistency without the same cast of players around them consistently. Leach will pull out another horseshoe and pick THE guy that gives them the best chance to win. Has anyone asked him his prediction of wins based on who the starter is?I'm happy with Gubrud, Gordon, or Tinsley (or Cooper, Bledsoe, and Cruz, for that matter). Mike Leach will make the right choice and, as a fan, I'm not really interested in pitting one against the other. I'm rooting for all of them.
Glad Cougar
Does CHRISTIAN HAANGANA have a brother that can play DT? He is one large man.I think it's really tough to gauge their overall consistency without the same cast of players around them consistently. Leach will pull out another horseshoe and pick THE guy that gives them the best chance to win. Has anyone asked him his prediction of wins based on who the starter is?
Does CHRISTIAN HAANGANA have a brother that can play DT? He is one large man.
Remember this guy at 400? Couldn't/wouldn't/ didn't have to bend his legs in high school.....just lean on em' and fall on him.I saw him hold his ground a couple times against McDougle, while McDougle generally pushed everyone else back.
Gordon is TOOO INCONSISTENT, like he has always been.
He had a good scrimmage, followed that up with a 3 to 6 interception scrimmage, followed by a good spring game.
That is NOT consistent, good enough.
And as good as Tinsley has been all spring, (better then Gordon), Tinsley reminds me of Dave Krieg, good but fumbling, accidentally have the ball slip out get intercepted. That like Dave Krieg is NOT good enough, but will have to be, if Gabrud is not ready to go.
So NO Gordon will not be the starter.
Gage will be the starter. Its his job to lose.
And if Gage is not able to go, Tinsley will be the starter.
I saw him hold his ground a couple times against McDougle, while McDougle generally pushed everyone else back.
I think it's really tough to gauge their overall consistency without the same cast of players around them consistently. Leach will pull out another horseshoe and pick THE guy that gives them the best chance to win. Has anyone asked him his prediction of wins based on who the starter is?
Hats off to whomever took a good chance on this guy. Someone must of said that this guy would look good at 345. Don't know if he's a weight room junkie (something tells me he a video game/Doritos/can of bean dip junkie in HS), but if he was- he'd a be the strongest player on the team.It's amazing what this conditioning staff has done with many of our players. Haangana is a different body.
I agree.....although..all 4 QB's have had their moment which led me to ask about how many wins could you get with each one. Do you think they'd have a winning record IF they had to start one of these five. What if they had to start Aaron Angelos? If I were a Big Sky team...I'd be watching Bledsoe and Angelos.Gordon clearly has a better arm than Tinsley, and while Tinsley is no statue, Gordon is more agile/elusive. It's a safe bet it'll come down to Gordon and Gubrud.
Thanks coachGordon is TOOO INCONSISTENT, like he has always been.
He had a good scrimmage, followed that up with a 3 to 6 interception scrimmage, followed by a good spring game.
That is NOT consistent, good enough.
And as good as Tinsley has been all spring, (better then Gordon), Tinsley reminds me of Dave Krieg, good but fumbling, accidentally have the ball slip out get intercepted. That like Dave Krieg is NOT good enough, but will have to be, if Gabrud is not ready to go.
So NO Gordon will not be the starter.
Gage will be the starter. Its his job to lose.
And if Gage is not able to go, Tinsley will be the starter.
Interestingly, Bledsoe had a scholarship to Big Sky's Northern Arizona coming out of HS but opted to walk on at WSU.I agree.....although..all 4 QB's have had their moment which led me to ask about how many wins could you get with each one. Do you think they'd have a winning record IF they had to start one of these five. What if they had to start Aaron Angelos? If I were a Big Sky team...I'd be watching Bledsoe and Angelos.
I think if Gubruud doesn’t capitalize we could have a Menkenbaum situation. I think both these QBs will drive Leach nuts. Which sucks because the offense is pretty loaded everywhere else (thin at RB but Borghi is all PAC12 good)Gordon is TOOO INCONSISTENT, like he has always been.
He had a good scrimmage, followed that up with a 3 to 6 interception scrimmage, followed by a good spring game.
That is NOT consistent, good enough.
And as good as Tinsley has been all spring, (better then Gordon), Tinsley reminds me of Dave Krieg, good but fumbling, accidentally have the ball slip out get intercepted. That like Dave Krieg is NOT good enough, but will have to be, if Gabrud is not ready to go.
So NO Gordon will not be the starter.
Gage will be the starter. Its his job to lose.
And if Gage is not able to go, Tinsley will be the starter.
Gubrud will start. Mark it down in ink. He’s Minshew with better wheels.
Go track his stats - and then say it was all Kooper Krupp (it wasn’t). He could have gone pretty much anywhere in the country for his grad transfer. This isn’t some schlock FCS backup. He’s Vernon Adams with a better arm and math skills. And for certain Vernon Adams would walk in and start for this Coug team.
All this hand wringing over Tinsley and Gordon is like debating Farmers vs Allstate homeowners insurance is better. You only care in the case of chaotistrofic events. And even then they both pay out about the same.
Leech knows this. Tyler’s passing put a gap in the succession plan. Gubrud will fill the gap fine.