ADVERTISEMENT

Tastiest dog breed thread - poll coming

Listening to RFK is basically the same thing as listening to Patrick Mahomes Brother. Dude is a never has been attention whore, who gives a flying F what that asshat has to say. He should be endorsing Trump he’s a perfect addition to his team.

You are an NPC.
 
JD Vance is awkward as is, put him up against a dude who’s just genuinely good people and, oh boy! Wowzas! It’s such a short clip but says so much.


Neat video, literally means nothing.



O7WFT9SxEkLT.jpeg
 
Okay, on the run, but will squeeze this in..........

When you say you are going to pick the very best candidate for a position, and it ends up being a women that you share her qualifications with and she is head and shoulders above other candidates, more power to her. When the hiring entity says they are going to hire a woman, then 1/2 of the candidate pool is instantly eliminated. So what are we supposed to think? If the hiring entity comes out and says that they are going to hire the best man for the job, I would immediately say that is discrimination, eliminating half of the candidate pool and quite possibly eliminating the best possible person for the job. So yes, I am totally convinced that she was a DEI selection, and not the best possible person for the job. Yes, she has had some good positions, but not an impressive list of accomplishments, IMHO.

As evidence to back that up, Biden also telegraphed his intention to do a DEI selection for the Supreme Court. He specifically stated he was going to hire a black woman for the job, obvious payback to James Clyburn for basically rescuing Biden's campaign in 2020. Once again, at least for appearance's sake you need to state that you will do an exhaustive search and then select the best candidate for the job. By saying he was going to nominate a black woman for the court, that meant he was eliminating 90-95% of the possible field to choose from. If it looks like DEI, walks like DEI, and talks like DEI, it most likely IS DEI. Three points to illustrate why she might not, probably not, was the best qualified to be on the Supreme Court. 1. She was unable to define a woman. WTH? How pathetic is that? 2. She repeated a point from an attorney that AR's (or maybe it was even automatic rifles) fired 600-800 rounds per second! Seriously, how clueless is that? 3. She claimed that black women have twice as good outcomes when the deliver a baby with a black doctor! How stupid is that? Does she really think that is true? Ha!

Yes, I realize that I have just discussed two "black" women, so I undoubtedly will get attacked for being a racist, while ignoring the facts of the situation. Just remember I could have included folks like Mayor Pete, Admiral Rachel, the luggage stealing weirdo, etc, but time prevents that. Gotta run....
When you say you are going to pick the very best candidate for a position, and it ends up being a women that you share her qualifications with and she is head and shoulders above other candidates, more power to her. When the hiring entity says they are going to hire a woman, then 1/2 of the candidate pool is instantly eliminated. So what are we supposed to think? If the hiring entity comes out and says that they are going to hire the best man for the job, I would immediately say that is discrimination, eliminating half of the candidate pool and quite possibly eliminating the best possible person for the job. So yes, I am totally convinced that she was a DEI selection, and not the best possible person for the job. Yes, she has had some good positions, but not an impressive list of accomplishments, IMHO.

In what scenario does any of this you said pertain to Harris? The selection process for VP never is stated as picking the best candidate. It's selecting the person who gives the ticket the best chance to win, by catering to a certain electorate or winning a certain state and balancing out the ticket etc. That is exactly why trump selected pence, to cater to the evangelicals. It's why Obama picked Biden, to appeal to white voters. "Best qualified" is not part of the occasion. Harris certainly was qualified and she brought other benefits which paid off.

Harris was not a DEI "hire" for her senate seat either because she was elected. Jackson has nothing to do with Harris and is a whole different discussion. I agree, Biden should have just nominated her without stating that he was going to pick a black woman. Just do it.

The danger of throwing out DEI is that it automatically puts the USER of that term in the position of seeming to think that a minority could never just be an imminently qualified person and that it MUST ONLY be because they are a minority and couldn't POSSIBLY get picked for any other reason. Because Republicans who use that term only use it to denegrate minorities. It's dog-whistle shit. I don't believe you hold that belief, so I would ask again if you still think harris qualifies as a "DEI" hire for VP?
 
What position are we talking about? Disguise artist? Passport handler? Parole officer?
He’ll be secretary of health & human services. First act will be dissolution of the CDC, followed by decertification of anyone who’s actually been to medical school. Replace vaccination schedules with guidelines on how much a patient should be bled for various ailments. We need to make sure that, just like our laws, our medical treatments reflect what the founders would have done.
 
So when Taylor Swift endorses Harris will that matter? She draws more of a crowd going out to eat than Trump ever has at a rally.
She endorsed “anyone but Trump” long ago.

There’s a new group “Swifties for Trump”. Have you seen it? I noticed it when the TDS crowd came after Patrick Mahomes wife for liking a tweet.
 
She endorsed “anyone but Trump” long ago.

There’s a new group “Swifties for Trump”. Have you seen it? I noticed it when the TDS crowd came after Patrick Mahomes wife for liking a tweet.
Crazy that someone who’s gonna get taxed substantially more under D policies is still supporting the D candidate over Trump. Wonder why?
 
Nice straw man from creepy Larry. Notice how Leisure Suit Larry didn’t name anyone that was allegedly calling Elon an idiot? That’s because 9 years ago no one was calling Elon an idiot. Although back then in Silicon Valley many people knew that Elon was wacko.

Today however anyone paying attention knows without a doubt that Elon is a nutter and a certifiable idiot for, among other things, what he’s done to Tesla and Twitter.

It’s bizarre and fascinating how right wingers want to shake up US government while simultaneously worshipping at the feet of the billionaire class who are the ones largely responsible for effing up our government in the first place.
 
That’s no article. It’s RFK Jr the kook fellating Trump for a role in his administration. He reached out to the Harris campaign too with hopes of a Harris cabinet position in exchange for his endorsement. They told him to pound sand.
 
Actually Kennedy is wrong....the time period MAGA is talking about is the 50's. Booming economy, middle class growing. Out of WW2 (or the first world war to Trump's knowledge), limited war in Korea...then the meat and potato's of the grievances...you can figure it out. BTW....tax rate on the wealthiest 49% and they were doing just fine, and not pissing and moaning about "their money".
 
So you want Trump to start WWIII to juice our economy like WWII did. Neat.

1) Trump is too much of a pussy to do that
2) The only thing Trump will do, yet again, to try and boost the economy is more tax cuts for his fellow billionaires.

more gobbly gook from vaccine man
 
Actually Kennedy is wrong....the time period MAGA is talking about is the 50's. Booming economy, middle class growing. Out of WW2 (or the first world war to Trump's knowledge), limited war in Korea...then the meat and potato's of the grievances...you can figure it out. BTW....tax rate on the wealthiest 49% and they were doing just fine, and not pissing and moaning about "their money".

you said absolutely nothing, cool
 
Well what happens when Trump either leaves office or dies? He is the only person that can make america great again, and inflation lowest of the largest economies right now, high stock market, low unemployment, violent crime going down. I guess I am wondering what he will do when things don't go his way, like the last pandemic. He knew what was coming to America, and for his own self interests, it was one or two cases, and then he will reopen the economy on the day Jesus rose. He would have won 2020 if he didn't lie about the most important thing to happen to our country in years.
 
Well what happens when Trump either leaves office or dies? He is the only person that can make america great again, and inflation lowest of the largest economies right now, high stock market, low unemployment, violent crime going down. I guess I am wondering what he will do when things don't go his way, like the last pandemic. He knew what was coming to America, and for his own self interests, it was one or two cases, and then he will reopen the economy on the day Jesus rose. He would have won 2020 if he didn't lie about the most important thing to happen to our country in years.
The stupid thing about MAGA is it’s just a recycled message from every presidential challenger to an incumbent (in this case party). “America has been shitty the last four or eight years with (insert name/party) in office. We’re gonna make it better!”
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT