ADVERTISEMENT

Missiles into Russia

waiting is over, it would seem.

Action phase appears to have entered the chat.

Putin’s serve.

I’m lucky though. I’m old enuff to have been trained by the government how to survive a nuclear strike while in elementary school, so I’m safe.
I had that training also, long, long ago. Ours was slightly different. We had glass walls all along one side of the classroom, and there were long coat racks lining the hallway outside the classroom. Thus, our instructions were to get into the hallway, kneel and curl up against the wall with the coats over our heads.

Pretty sure that gave us total protection from the giant atomic blast that we were expecting. Ha!

Missiles into Russia

As frail as he may be he still has advisors who are competent in their fields of expertise.

Wait till the toddler in chief and his traveling clown show of yes men and women get the keys again. It’s going to get wild.
That statement is up for some serious, serious debate. In every department, in every subject.

But relative to the subject at hand, the Russia/Ukraine war, those competent, expert advisors that you claim exist have so far managed to do almost everything wrong in this war. They took exactly 0 (ZERO!) actions to defer Russia's incursion, then have dithered and fiddled with every decision of support to Ukraine, meaning that they have not enabled Ukraine to win, only allowed them to hang on for a while to avoid a quick and decisive loss. And now those brilliant genius advisors have managed to get 3 of our 4 biggest enemies to actually team up against our "ally" Ukraine. China is providing armaments/weapons to Russia and now North Korea is providing soldiers to assist Russia in fighting the war.

They have also managed to do everything wrong in the Gaza/Israel conflict also, but that is a subject for another thread.

Competent advisors? What a laugh that is!
  • Like
Reactions: HCoug

Missiles into Russia

Acting as the world's police force hasn't exactly been awesome. In case you missed it the defense budget is not keeping pace with inflation, the military cannot hit its recruitment numbers, and procurement has been awful.

The average age of a Ukrainian solider is 43. So, math tells us that for every 20 year old there is a 60 year old. If there is any coherent policy from Biden on Ukraine, it appears to be to provide enough aid for Ukraine not to lose, but not enough aid to win. Good for Raytheon shareholders, but not so good if you're a Ukrainian. Ukraine will run out of people and bullets before Russia does. So, what is your solution? Seems like three possibilities to me: (1) NATO boots on the ground and a shooting war with Russia; (2) the status quo of providing aid and Ukraine being slowly ground down and hoping for the possibility that Putin dies or gets ousted before Ukraine collapses and the new guy is more dove-ish which is a significant assumption; or (3) force a peace deal.

As long as you’re under 60, you’re eligible for the Ukraine International Legion.

FWIW, even though I think that Trump is a shit stain on our democracy, he is also just crazy enough and radical enough to have very good ideas on some topics. He was absolutely right to put NATO on notice that they have a responsibility to hold up their end of the bargain. His problem is that because he does have a weird thing for Putin, he weakens the alliance with his rhetoric rather than strengthening it.

NATO should be putting more money in (and they have been getting better) and its not our job to save everyone. That said, we spend over $800 billion on defense each year. We have spent roughly $60 billion this year in aid to Ukraine. It's important to note that a large portion of that aid is in used equipment that we were no longer going to be using anyway. In my world view, spending 5-10% of our annual budget weakening an adversary is some of the best money we can spend. My only critique of Biden is that we should give Ukraine the weapons and aid and tell them to make the best use of it, not put artificial restraints on the aid that limit their effectiveness. Half-assing your way through a war is the best way to replicate a Vietnam or Afghanistan. The reason that Israel is so effective is that they fight to win....not to participate.

History is going to look back at the GOP and the MAGA movement and not judge it kindly. I'm no Biden or Kamala fan, but I'd also rather be on the right side of history.

WSU at New Mexico game thread....

The NIL/portal world really encourages schools to form alignments to make themselves developmental sites for the blue bloods. The G5 school takes the recruits and coaches them for a year or two, then they take the pipeline to Ohio state or whatever. The ones who don’t pan out at the big school take the pipeline the other way.

While I hate that model and don’t support it, sometimes it’s best to be first…

You can only play so many kids at a time. Kids move in, kids move out. A staff’s ability to get kids prepared and coached up as fast as possible is really important now. Those staffs that can will move forward. Those staffs that cant will tread water barely able to keep their head up.

I would wager we will see the talent spread out a lil bit more.

Missiles into Russia

I don’t think we will ever not have several thousand nukes pointed at us.

That said, Flats point is really the only one to consider regarding strategy. Do we have a hard line with dictators and despots or do we kiss their asses and hope for the best. I’m not saying one is definitively going to work better than the other but you should know what you voted for…I know I do.
You voted for an empty vessel that would have been filled by the D establishment and defense industrial complex, and a few hundred thousand more dead Ukrainians. Or maybe war with Iran.

Missiles into Russia

Russia has about 5000 nukes. China has about 500. Not sure about North Korea. Ball park, I'd say every American has a couple thousand pointed at us.
I don’t think we will ever not have several thousand nukes pointed at us.

That said, Flats point is really the only one to consider regarding strategy. Do we have a hard line with dictators and despots or do we kiss their asses and hope for the best. I’m not saying one is definitively going to work better than the other but you should know what you voted for…I know I do.

MBB:UNCO

Cedric Coward ties career-best with 30 points in WSU men’s victory​

Greg WoodsNov. 18, 2024 at 10:05 pm
By
The Spokesman-Review
PULLMAN — A certain inevitability hangs in the arena when Cedric Coward decides to take matters into his hands. Washington State’s best player is so good because of his two-way ability, because of his natural scoring savvy, because of his game smarts and veteran experience.

But the Cougars knocked off Northern Colorado Monday night, 83-69, in large part because Coward decided to take over in the scoring column. The senior totaled 30 points, his most on the season, including 20 in the second half, taking things from closer to cushiony for the 4-1 Cougs. Coward also scored 30 last season against Northern Colorado when he played for Eastern Washington.

“I wouldn’t call it hunting my shot. I just say it’s being aggressive and assertive and making the right play,” Coward said. “Some days it would be me being aggressive like this and dropping 30, as you see. And then other days it would be aggressive and having 12 assists. As long as I’m making the right play for my teammates, that’s the main goal.”

It was a timely development for WSU, which was coming off a defeat to Iowa in Illinois, where Coward totaled only 9 points in 33 minutes. The game before, in WSU’s win over Idaho, he posted 4 points on 3 shots. He was still playing well, still making the right plays, but he wasn’t looking for his shot as actively as coaches would like.

So on Monday night, he snapped out of it, responding with an ultra-efficient 12-for-18 showing, including 2 for 6 from deep. He did it the only way he knows how: By staying in control and getting to his spots. He recognized mismatches when he got them and wasted no time taking advantage, banking in several flip shots and getting to the rim with ease.

Part of making those changes, coach David Riley figured, comes baked into his offense. He doesn’t call a play every time down the court, letting his players pass and make reads and attack when they see openings. In that type of laissez-faire approach, he says, it becomes easy to “float a little bit at times.”

“So I thought he’s adjusted,” said Riley, whose team returns to action Thursday against his former squad, Eastern Washington, on Thursday at Spokane Arena. “It was great to see, and just proud of him. We knew it was coming. He’s such a high-character guy, and he’s gonna have a great season for us. So it was good to get him back on that.”

The Cougs needed it in the second half. About seven minutes into the second half, after hanging around for much of the game, the Bears took the lead on a corner three-pointer. The Cougars were giving up too many offensive rebounds — Northern Colorado turned 11 offensive boards into 6 second-chance points — and the Bears knocked down eight three-pointers total.

In that stretch, Riley said, the hosts were going through the motions, playing “random” on offense. It was less active and more passive, and even with the Cougs’ giant size advantage on the interior, they didn’t always cash in. When one action didn’t work, they didn’t always put a second one in gear.

So what changed? To Riley, it was a lineup that included guards Isaiah Watts and Kase Wynott and power forward ND Okafor, a group that “played with some force and energy,” Riley said. After the Bears tied the score at 55-all, the Cougs responded with an 18-7 run, which featured three baskets from Coward and two from Watts, who tallied 12 points on four triples, plus six rebounds. That put WSU up double digits.

For Watts, it was the end of a rough stretch. Over his past three games, he misfired on 13 straight triples, an uncharacteristic development for a guy whose catch-and-shoot game makes him so effective. He was frustrated enough that on Monday morning, when he got some practice shots up with his dad, Donald, he broke down crying.

“Just because it’s like, I feel that’s what I do, that’s what I’m here for,” Watts said. “And to not be able to do it at my best, it was really emotional for me. So just to hit a couple today feels really good.”

Another uncharacteristic part of Monday’s game: Guard Nate Calmese, who recorded 27 points on Saturday in Illinois, managed only 4 points in 21 minutes. At one point, he wrapped a towel around his head on the bench. At another, he came off the floor with an injury, and as he walked to the locker room with a trainer, he shouted in frustration.

Riley, who said the team will evaluate Calmese’s injury in the days to come, added that’s the kind of thing that can happen after a big scoring night. He might not be the head of the snake at WSU — that title likely belongs to Coward — but he is the point guard. That prompts opponents to key in on him.

“He’s another guy that’s still learning,” Riley said. “Learning the offense, learning the different details on it. Northern Colorado knows us pretty well, so they had some good plans against us. But he’s a hooper, and he’ll bounce back.”

Riley added that WSU is hoping that wing Rihards Vavers, who has been out since the season-opener with a wrist injury, and freshman guard Marcus Wilson, can return “in the next game or two.”

Greg Woods; Washington State beat writer for The Spokesman-Review

Missiles into Russia

It's typical American arrogance to assume that Putin's actions are driven solely by the President of the USA. Russia didn't rush into Ukraine as soon as Trump left, so it's a bit myopic to say that it wouldn't have happened if Trump had been re-elected in 2020. Nobody knows what will happen once Trump is in, but it is safe to say that he will cut off funding to Ukraine and that is going to force Ukraine to try to find a peaceful diplomatic solution that includes Russia gaining new territory.

Now, history suggests that "peaceful diplomatic solutions" where the aggressor had a net gain usually leads to that aggressor being more aggressive in the future. We'll see how things actually play out. The one thing that I can say with confidence is that the world is not a better place when Russia is feeling that it's ok to act aggressively.

I know that the MAGA world is infatuated with Trump and suffers from their own version of TDS, but Ronald Reagan is tossing and turning in his grave as a result of the lack of world leadership displayed by Trump in the past and likely in the future. Isolationism didn't work in the 1930's and it will not work out well for us today.
Acting as the world's police force hasn't exactly been awesome. In case you missed it the defense budget is not keeping pace with inflation, the military cannot hit its recruitment numbers, and procurement has been awful.

The average age of a Ukrainian solider is 43. So, math tells us that for every 20 year old there is a 60 year old. If there is any coherent policy from Biden on Ukraine, it appears to be to provide enough aid for Ukraine not to lose, but not enough aid to win. Good for Raytheon shareholders, but not so good if you're a Ukrainian. Ukraine will run out of people and bullets before Russia does. So, what is your solution? Seems like three possibilities to me: (1) NATO boots on the ground and a shooting war with Russia; (2) the status quo of providing aid and Ukraine being slowly ground down and hoping for the possibility that Putin dies or gets ousted before Ukraine collapses and the new guy is more dove-ish which is a significant assumption; or (3) force a peace deal.

As long as you’re under 60, you’re eligible for the Ukraine International Legion.
  • Like
Reactions: ATACFD and HCoug

Bowl Prospects

I don’t think anyone is going to remember the first round playoff games, because they don’t really matter.

Outside of their immediate fan bases, who remembers a 5/12 game from the NCAA tournament….or the 4/12 game from the 2nd round after an upset in the first? Most people probably don’t even remember who was in the final four, forget about the first round.

I guess more directly comparable to a first round game…who won the liberty bowl last year? Or the New Orleans bowl?
Fair comparison. I remember first round NCAA games and who got in more than I remember who won the NIT, but that’s just me.

And I remember the four teams in the playoff, which had they gone to another bcs bowl not related to the playoff I’d have forgotten.

Seattle Times ~ As money floods college sports, WSU’s Cougar Collective trying to keep up..

The NFL is a corporation, and corporations are allowed to restrain themselves. Boeing, Kellogg, Ford, Tesla, and every other business are allowed to choose their employees based on the qualifications they establish internally, as long as they don’t discriminate against protected classes. The NFL gets the same consideration.
The lawsuits have been aimed at the NCAA and college football. That’s a completely different scenario.

There’s absolutely nothing to prevent a junior on the WSU scout team from declaring for the draft and trying to go pro. NCAA rules would allow that, and the NFL would enter his name into the draft. He just wouldn’t get picked.

For anyone who did sue, it would be a waste of effort. The easy defense would be that he wasn’t good enough, or his skills didn’t fit our system, we had someone better, etc. No college player will have any sort of case against the NFL. The Kaepernick fiasco should be evidence of that.
Were nil and related lawsuits class actions or individuals? Seems it was some of each. Would class action be more successful?

Missiles into Russia

Putin did nothing during Trumps first term.

He invaded Crimea during Obama. He invaded Ukraine during Biden. He invaded Georgia during Obama

Please to be identifying Putin’s sweeping through Europe during a Trump presidency.

It's typical American arrogance to assume that Putin's actions are driven solely by the President of the USA. Russia didn't rush into Ukraine as soon as Trump left, so it's a bit myopic to say that it wouldn't have happened if Trump had been re-elected in 2020. Nobody knows what will happen once Trump is in, but it is safe to say that he will cut off funding to Ukraine and that is going to force Ukraine to try to find a peaceful diplomatic solution that includes Russia gaining new territory.

Now, history suggests that "peaceful diplomatic solutions" where the aggressor had a net gain usually leads to that aggressor being more aggressive in the future. We'll see how things actually play out. The one thing that I can say with confidence is that the world is not a better place when Russia is feeling that it's ok to act aggressively.

I know that the MAGA world is infatuated with Trump and suffers from their own version of TDS, but Ronald Reagan is tossing and turning in his grave as a result of the lack of world leadership displayed by Trump in the past and likely in the future. Isolationism didn't work in the 1930's and it will not work out well for us today.

Missiles into Russia

I’m not sure what you’re referencing here. I’m not sure what the “right” move is with Russia at this point. I’ll say, it’s quite the dilemma when you’ve got an ally who’s been invaded by Russia and currently at war with them while an incoming US administration is led by a Russian asset. That said it’s not surprising to see some unorthodox moves at this point. I’d imagine when Trump takes office, he’ll pull back and let Putin resume his sweep of Eastern Europe which he’s been patiently waiting on Trumps return for. I could be wrong but we can revisit in a few years and see how things are going over there. 🤝
Putin did nothing during Trumps first term.

He invaded Crimea during Obama. He invaded Ukraine during Biden. He invaded Georgia during Obama

Please to be identifying Putin’s sweeping through Europe during a Trump presidency.
  • Like
Reactions: LeachPack

Missiles into Russia

I’m not sure what you’re referencing here. I’m not sure what the “right” move is with Russia at this point. I’ll say, it’s quite the dilemma when you’ve got an ally who’s been invaded by Russia and currently at war with them while an incoming US administration is led by a Russian asset. That said it’s not surprising to see some unorthodox moves at this point. I’d imagine when Trump takes office, he’ll pull back and let Putin resume his sweep of Eastern Europe which he’s been patiently waiting on Trumps return for. I could be wrong but we can revisit in a few years and see how things are going over there. 🤝
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT