Re: Didn't you rave about Breske and point to the numbers
Originally posted by CougEd:
at Wyoming? Why didn't it work?
I think the big question is why didn't it work consistently. When it worked it worked extremely well when it was bad it was extremely bad.
I think the problem with his defense here was that it's a very gamble intensive defense, and when you have a young secondary / slow speed in comparison to the opposition you can get burned... and I mean burned bad.
I remember a few times when we blitzed there was a 1 on 1 and it was over. I remember a corner blitz and I think stanford the guy was wide open. Rutgers Tracy Clark burned first play.
Guys too slow to the gap getting cutback lanes torched. At Wyoming the talent probably was as deficient as it was here since they were in the MWC, and at Montana they are one of the better FCS programs so better talent than the compeition...
Here we are at a major talent deficiency (the gap is closing, but when they got here it was significant, and with so many really young guys I mean now your problem is youth...so you are running a gambling defense with young guys...not good.)
I thought it would be much better considering how seasoned our front 7 was, and when they actually played well the defense looked totally different...actually good. But when they were off the secondary was murdered, and when they were off the gaps left huge holes.
Unfortunate that it didn't work.