Since you have been here so long, how come I don't see you getting your panties in a bunch when Yaki goes on his namecalling all the time?
Wulff is certainly not my hero...and I sure as hell didn't name myself after him.
I just can't imagine walking myself so far into a bad argument that my best defense is pretending not to understand how the flu works.
I bet you're in EVERY Wulff thread, offering some defense. It's not "only", it's "compulsive". Just one. One Wulff thread you don't feel compelled to offer up a defense in. One QB who came in sick when he wasn't well enough to start. And you'd have, maybe a point. (not on the flu denial, but at least Wulff's decision)
Yaki has also been banned by the previous regime...and would still be banned if Tony had not sold the site. Again, you are not bringing anything to the table. All you are doing here is badgering me and leg humping my posts.
You are in every Wulff thread bashing the guy. It's compulsive.
No, people can understand what I'm saying without being related to me, which I can understand must feel really foreign to you, especially on here.
Not true- these run for days on end without me participating. It's not just me who thinks Wulff was bad... but it is just you or your brother who's insistent, "nah, he was great". And there's never a "well, he messed that up"- perfect coach, just lost 40 of 49 games.
Actions speak louder than words, and your constant defense- a daily, vigorous defense- says the volumes you obviously wish you could.
Actually, your constant bashing of Wulff, while naming yourself after Wulff speaks the loudest.
Only to your flu denial crew, man. Everyone else wonders why some idiot is pretending they don't know what the flu is.
So you are on here doing the exact same thing that you are bitching about me of doing. Ever heard the term hypocrite?
Well, everyone here also thinks the flu leads to broken collar bones. Guess that is why there is such a plethora of those injuries with those who play with the flu.
Only everyone we can name who wasn't cleared to start. And nobody thinks "the flu causes broken collarbones", but that was the ledge you chose to shimmy out onto to defend Wulff against everyone who gave one of about six viable reasons Wulff shouldn't have played him that day.
Like I said, only on this board does the flu cause a QB to not step out of bounds. Surprises me none that is what the majority thinks.
I went to WSU.
Because of the amount of variables,(qb doesnt start, feels better, against Idaho st, up 14 zip, 73 degrees fahrenheit) of course it would be impossible to find this exact same scenario...although Ed showed you Spurrier did pretty much the same thing.
And a lot of people miss games with the flu too. But it's pretty rare (we've been at this almost a month, and so far you've given me Tuel and Marshawn Lynch as the only ones) to be TOO SICK to start the game, then suddenly better 10 minutes later.
Do you always have to play the victim? I was with you on the name calling Sponge. But do you have to whine sodamn much? I'm letting this go, as CP has aptly pointed out, there is no point and it's getting in the way. I've re-read my posts and am satisfied I've proven my point. To each there own but cripes Sponge, let go of the victim card.
Yes, the coach shouldn't have put him in that position, agreed. I haven't found any other coaches who have, have you?
Do you always have to chime in on matters not concerning you?
Yep..and they were listed.
Then name more than one. You keep saying this, but since you're just saying it, and intentionally avoiding citing examples (or... maybe you don't know any?) I don't believe you.
Why do you always feel the need to butt in and give your 2 cents?
