Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AG impresses less every week. Lots of ill-advised throws last night. Lots of throws into coverage, to receivers who weren’t open. Lots of leaving the pocket early. Lots of failing to see open receivers. Lots of staring down the one he wanted, and failing to go through progressions. Past the halfway point of the season, I’m no longer surprised that he got beat by Minshew last year. The only surprise is that there was a competition at all.Key to the game will he AG making decisive reads and getting the ball out early. If he does his Falk impression he'll be sacked 5+ times.
Falk is one of the greatest QB's in the history of the program. He was the QB that turned around the program and won a lot of games for WSU. Once Cracraft went down, his receiver corps was just Marks. Very few of his receivers would get playing time this year, as they would be buried on the depth chart.Key to the game will he AG making decisive reads and getting the ball out early. If he does his Falk impression he'll be sacked 5+ times.
Aaaaaand, his senior year he spent 5,6,7,8 seconds in the pocket scanning for his 1st, 2nd,3rd,4th,5th receivers, never finding one and taking 2,3,4,5 sacks a game.Falk is one of the greatest QB's in the history of the program. He was the QB that turned around the program and won a lot of games for WSU. Once Cracraft went down, his receiver corps was just Marks. Very few of his receivers would get playing time this year, as they would be buried on the depth chart.
Truth. We all love Falk and would pick up his tab if we bumped into him in a bar, but it’s ok to call a spade a spade. There were a lot of painful moments his senior year and the defense carried that team.Aaaaaand, his senior year he spent 5,6,7,8 seconds in the pocket scanning for his 1st, 2nd,3rd,4th,5th receivers, never finding one and taking 2,3,4,5 sacks a game.
Yes, and in hindsight point taken from 1990.Truth. We all love Falk and would pick up his tab if we bumped into him in a bar, but it’s ok to call a spade a spade. There were a lot of painful moments his senior year and the defense carried that team.
He was playing injured.Truth. We all love Falk and would pick up his tab if we bumped into him in a bar, but it’s ok to call a spade a spade. There were a lot of painful moments his senior year and the defense carried that team.
Aaaaand go back and look who those 2nd,3rd, and 4th receivers were after Williams graduated and Cracraft went down. They didn't get open or ran a bad route, all the while Marks was double covered. There was a reason why he held the ball.Aaaaaand, his senior year he spent 5,6,7,8 seconds in the pocket scanning for his 1st, 2nd,3rd,4th,5th receivers, never finding one and taking 2,3,4,5 sacks a game.
He was playing injured.
AG impresses less every week. Lots of ill-advised throws last night. Lots of throws into coverage, to receivers who weren’t open. Lots of leaving the pocket early. Lots of failing to see open receivers. Lots of staring down the one he wanted, and failing to go through progressions. Past the halfway point of the season, I’m no longer surprised that he got beat by Minshew last year. The only surprise is that there was a competition at all.
Agreed, that was a big takeaway for me. We’ve got late season games in Eugene, Cal, UW, and 2 more in Pullman. Likely to see a couple of those in less than ideal conditions. Great to see it didn’t seem to effect Gordon at all, especially considering how GM2 had issues with weather last year.Gordon threw a 69% completion rate. That’s a solid completion percentage, especially when you consider he’s throwing for over 10 yards per play. I sat through that game, he played very well in those conditions.
Honestly it doesn't matter what the "reason" or "excuse" was, it was unacceptable for him to take those sacks after standing back there scanning the field for more than 3 seconds. If you're a qb your internal clock has to be going off and either you find someone or toss it out of bounds. How much more productive would that offense have been if they weren't consistently digging themselves out of long yardage situations?Aaaaand go back and look who those 2nd,3rd, and 4th receivers were after Williams graduated and Cracraft went down. They didn't get open or ran a bad route, all the while Marks was double covered. There was a reason why he held the ball.
Then, go watch how he got rid of the ball when Williams, Marks, and Cracraft were healthy. Meaning it is easy to get rid of the ball faster when you have receivers open. Don't forget that Falk's 3rd or 4th best receiver for a few years was Lewis. The same Lewis who couldn't even get on the field as recruiting got better.
Many of you are underselling just how good Falk was. One other thing, the offensive line has been much better since McGuire left.