Your personal anecdotes are not interesting, funny, or relevant.
OT- Oops, voter fraud is underway
- Thread starter Stretch 74
- Start date
Pretty sure it’s Donald J Trump not Donald E Trump. Although your vote will probably be shit on and run through a shredder then fed to Minneapolis Haitian cats, so probably won’t matter 🤷
Recent events say my vote is more likely to be lit on fire.
I'll put you into consideration. President or VP?
Not trying to be funny. The anecdote is very relevant. These people get crapped on by Draft Dodger Donnie and they vote for a Fugazi, a fraud, a businessman that was handed 400 million dollars by daddy .
But feel free to keep defending the indefensible....
Last edited:
Is it relevant that Harris is married to a guy that broke up his first marriage by impregnating the nanny and then slapped a girlfriend? Is it relevant that Harris ascended in SF politics when dating Willie Brown? Is it relevant that Harris failed the bar exam? If she's the hard ass prosecutor she claims to be, where is the video of the killer closing argument that sent a bad guy to jail?
I see. So it all comes down to you being jealous that Trump was "given" $400 million by his father and you didn't get anything like that. So sorry you missed out.
And in the past Harris has bragged about the 100's of cases she prosecuted and after getting investigated it turned out she actually prosecuted less than a dozen cases. And in either Oakland (I think it was) or SF in about a year and a half on the job she turned in a single (one, 1) time sheet with more than 8 hours in a day. That while the rest of the office were commonly working 10 and 12 hour days. Way to be a leader, Kamalalala!
And by the way, she is a criminal. When she first ran for office the law stated that she was only allowed to spend $200,000, but with Old Willie's influence she was able to raise and then spent over $600,000. Of course she wasn't prosecuted because all of the officials on the oversight board had been appointed by Old Willie himself. Isn't it nice to have friends in low places?
Ha! The other side of the aisle sits a rapist who’s married to a hooker who he cheated on with a porn star while she was pregnant. You can’t be serious with these arguments of morality.
Gee, aren't you the guy that was just putting down the use of whataboutisms a few posts up the thread? Of course you are, but I guess it is all okay whenever you do it.
“We don’t rely on American banks. We have all of the funding we need out of Russia” -Jr
“Russians make up a disproportionate section of a lot of our assets. A lot of money is pouring in from Russia” -Eric
Would you rather be F’d in the ass for money by Willie or Putin? At least Willie is an American.
Stretch... now that is funny. That is a "stretch",a far one, from what I said. First I have zip to be jealous of. I didnt need to rip off people to make a nice living. Nor did I ever have to pop in a tic tac and to grope and grab women my daughters age and grab them by the pussy.
Third, I dont have to wear bronzer and a diaper over a girdle. Yes it is known all over DC he is the pissed himself President.
Fourth, I preferred earning my money and not have to do it off the backs of those hard working men and women in the trades vs filing bk on them after spending all of daddys money then getting bailed out by jim as well.
Fifth, I don't hang out with a bunch of people who did and are doing time. I know it is just a coincident the drain your swamp guy has 12 associates that did time.
Kinda sounds like you are the one arguing morality, Gibby. And to respond to your relevancy questions, No, No, No, and No that is just stupid.
So what if she dated Willie Brown 30 years ago and he did her a couple of favors? Like that never happens or is somehow immoral? Spend any time in the real world?
Harris failed the bar exam once, which is far from uncommon. You know that. She passed it on try #2. Big F-ing deal. And again - 30, 35 years ago? What is your point counselor?
This post makes no sense without a description of how cute your daughters are (hope to Gawd they got their mom's looks) and how old they are. Marital or relationship status is unimportant, as I have no morals. Actually, how old they are doesn't matter either as I'm sure they are at least 18.
Trump is not a paragon of morality. Is that new?
Ed really likes to recount the grab them by the pussy tape. A fixation perhaps?
Last edited:
I reject your premise.
And if you're capable of being honest with yourself (i have my doubts) we're all a little brainwashed in some way.
Btw, you claim harris is the equivalent of paul wulff bad. Do you believe wulff is the worst coach in wsu history and which coach would you assign trump?
Of course you reject the premise. Thats what losers say when they’re beaten and know it. Heard it many times in the courtroom. Nothing better to say, it’s denial.
For your analogy, take your pick of mediocre coaches. Rolovich I guess.
I reject your premise because as I've demonstrated it's flawed and a false equivalency...AND naive. You feign outrage that a political party behaves hypocritically. Please.
You really believe rolo was BETTER than wulff?...and that he would be trump in this hypothetical comparison?
You’re admitting that the Democrats are full of shit about democracy even though they’ve appointed themselves as the defenders of democracy. Did your brain survive that deviation from your programming?
Wulff was totally incompetent. Rolovich caused himself problems. Makes sense to people who are not brainwashed. Look up their winning percentages if you need some data.
Probably a pretty good comp. He’s got the potential to get outscored 38-0 in the second half twice in a short time.
So back to presidential politics...if Harris is wulff and trump is rolovich and you need to hire a new coach having only two options, you clearly would choose rolovich (trump).
Yet in this election you abstain when there clearly is a superior candidate. Why the lack of courage to express your clear preference?
Like 90 pointed out...you "never" voted for trump but continue to defend him at nearly every turn with rationalizations and whataboutisms.
Maybe you think by not casting a vote for either you're making a moral stance to be above them both. You're in good company with several others on this board using the demographics of Washington as a cop-out. Congratulations, your medal is in the mail! Taihtsat
Thank you for admitting the Democrats are full of shit on the democracy rhetoric. Not sure why it took this long, but you made it.
Willfully obtuse with a dash of motivated-reasoning pretty much summarizes your "argument" as you desperately cling to the "democracy" false-equivelancy.
Thank you, counselor, you may step down. As Vinny Gambini said to judge Chamberlain Haller "I'm done with this guy, your honor"! Taihtsat
I've already explained this to you. Your deficient memory may be related to the brainwashing. You are trying to make it Rs versus Ds, when the framing should be establishment versus non-establishment. Use the search function on this website if you choose.
Thank you again for admitting the Ds democracy rhetoric is BS. There is no false equivalency, because no comparison was being made. The Ds are full of BS on that topic, as you have admitted.
Hilarious when Democrats try to bring up morality in presidential debates.
I'm pretty sure EVERYONE has baggage from one time or another, but LAWS and current/recent actions speak the loudest.
Great job with illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities guys. Bravo!
Tell me again what action/law Trump had for a 12-year old Houston girl to get rated?
You guys should donate more money to help those guys get sex changes.
Oh wait... maybe more covid shots since people shouldn't be able to choose.
I'm pretty sure EVERYONE has baggage from one time or another, but LAWS and current/recent actions speak the loudest.
Great job with illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities guys. Bravo!
Tell me again what action/law Trump had for a 12-year old Houston girl to get rated?
You guys should donate more money to help those guys get sex changes.
Oh wait... maybe more covid shots since people shouldn't be able to choose.
What... you're still here? Oaks, let's redirect. Follow along and please and try to stay on topic.
You claim democrats are portraying themselves as the protector of democracy this election, fair enough. I'll grant thatmis certainly one of their main points. Then you say they are hypocrites because they succeeded in convincing Biden to step aside after the party primary voting was completed. Fair enough, I'll even grant that.
This is where you err in saying what trump did in 2020 (which we both agree the democrats are campaigning against this cycle) is the same as what the DNC and party leadership (including the FORMER speaker, pelosi - you like that 😉) did thru THIS nomination process.
One (trump) came AFTER the final election, attempting to thwart the will of the majority of voters, failed court challenges, massive pushback (even some from his own party) with trump still lying and whining about it to this day, vs the other (Biden - Harris) that happened PRIOR to the convention (where parties officially nominate their candidates for the big finale) which was followed by NO significant party dissent, a huge boost in national polling, a major campaign donation influx, increased enthusiasm amongst the base and momentum overall.
Now if you can comprehend THAT and STILL wish to maintain your false-equivelancy, explain how the national election process is the same as the party selection process! To be hypocrites on this, it must be the same. How is it the same?
To make your point, you'll have to explain how the Democratic party disregarded the will of their voters in selecting their nominee for president that resulted in NO legal challenges, NO other candidates stepped forward, there was NO outrage (except by you and your fellow trump supporters), and where half the nation supports the candidate - an INCREASE compared to the support Biden was receiving.
Is your money buried in the back yard? You send messages to people via letter and stamp? Do you renew your vehicle tabs and license online or go wait in line for an hour at the DMV/vehicle licensing offices? All of these very personal things we are totally fine with doing electronically nowadays, yet somehow this one is massively fraudulent?
Didn’t Dominion already sue the tits off of Fox or OAN and win or they settled? Probably nuthin…🤷
And who TF is Robby Starbuck 😂. Does he work with Stormy Daniels too?
Breathe.
Smart people will notice this is an issue brought by Michigans Secretary of State, Joyce something. She is a Democrat.
If you’d like to know more about the issues voters are experiencing with her machines, X makes it easy for folks with an IQ above 60, to find additional sources of information to help you understand, with a simple click.
If you still can’t figure it out, let me know. I’ll be here to help you.
Good luck!
Smart people will notice this is an issue brought by Michigans Secretary of State, Joyce something. She is a Democrat.
If you’d like to know more about the issues voters are experiencing with her machines, X makes it easy for folks with an IQ above 60, to find additional sources of information to help you understand, with a simple click.
If you still can’t figure it out, let me know. I’ll be here to help you.
Good luck!
Here is another one. It’s a movie. Movies help those who can’t read, understand subject matter.
You’re welcome!
You’re welcome!
And yes, the Soros family brought a lawsuit against the Soros family . The lawsuit was settled out of court without discovery when the Soros family trust agreed to settle with the Soros family trust.
I do fine navigating X thanks though! It’s a good thing everything posted on X is 100% accurate and a reliable source of information! 😂
Mmmkay…sounds like some deflection, but you do you. Case closed I guess 🤷
You didn’t answer my first questions. Does the Soros family have something to do with 99.9% of your daily life being digital and completely fine for you, but you can’t handle a computer counting your vote?
