Tastiest dog breed thread - poll coming
- By Coug90
- The Beasley Baseline
- 1212 Replies
You know what they say about small crowds….confirmed by StormyLike the tiny crowd at Trump’s inauguration.
You know what they say about small crowds….confirmed by StormyLike the tiny crowd at Trump’s inauguration.
Like the tiny crowd at Trump’s inauguration.It matters. No matter what you say it matters.
So when Taylor Swift endorses Harris will that matter? She draws more of a crowd going out to eat than Trump ever has at a rally.It matters. No matter what you say it matters.
Game day sucks now with McCafé. My wife and I both stopped watching it and don’t tape it either anymore.McAfee in small doses was awesome. I couldn't watch CGD last year because of him. He's an insufferable, attention seeking prick who doesn't know when to shut his GD mouth.
Monty Python bonus pointWell....she does have huuuge......tracts of land.
“Fake news”. It’s echo chamber. There’s always a “logical” response.So Hannah Montana should run for President?
What about TV ratings . Does that matter ? RNC vs DNC?
So Hannah Montana should run for President?It matters. No matter what you say it matters.
Hannah Montana outdrew Trump maybe we should let her be president because of crowd size
Hannah Montana outdrew Trump maybe we should let her be president because of crowd sizeThe Arizona rally today. Kamala had a rally in the same spot, un(fortunately) she needed to black out the upper deck.
What does the pic show?
When you say you are going to pick the very best candidate for a position, and it ends up being a women that you share her qualifications with and she is head and shoulders above other candidates, more power to her. When the hiring entity says they are going to hire a woman, then 1/2 of the candidate pool is instantly eliminated. So what are we supposed to think? If the hiring entity comes out and says that they are going to hire the best man for the job, I would immediately say that is discrimination, eliminating half of the candidate pool and quite possibly eliminating the best possible person for the job. So yes, I am totally convinced that she was a DEI selection, and not the best possible person for the job. Yes, she has had some good positions, but not an impressive list of accomplishments, IMHO.Okay, on the run, but will squeeze this in..........
When you say you are going to pick the very best candidate for a position, and it ends up being a women that you share her qualifications with and she is head and shoulders above other candidates, more power to her. When the hiring entity says they are going to hire a woman, then 1/2 of the candidate pool is instantly eliminated. So what are we supposed to think? If the hiring entity comes out and says that they are going to hire the best man for the job, I would immediately say that is discrimination, eliminating half of the candidate pool and quite possibly eliminating the best possible person for the job. So yes, I am totally convinced that she was a DEI selection, and not the best possible person for the job. Yes, she has had some good positions, but not an impressive list of accomplishments, IMHO.
As evidence to back that up, Biden also telegraphed his intention to do a DEI selection for the Supreme Court. He specifically stated he was going to hire a black woman for the job, obvious payback to James Clyburn for basically rescuing Biden's campaign in 2020. Once again, at least for appearance's sake you need to state that you will do an exhaustive search and then select the best candidate for the job. By saying he was going to nominate a black woman for the court, that meant he was eliminating 90-95% of the possible field to choose from. If it looks like DEI, walks like DEI, and talks like DEI, it most likely IS DEI. Three points to illustrate why she might not, probably not, was the best qualified to be on the Supreme Court. 1. She was unable to define a woman. WTH? How pathetic is that? 2. She repeated a point from an attorney that AR's (or maybe it was even automatic rifles) fired 600-800 rounds per second! Seriously, how clueless is that? 3. She claimed that black women have twice as good outcomes when the deliver a baby with a black doctor! How stupid is that? Does she really think that is true? Ha!
Yes, I realize that I have just discussed two "black" women, so I undoubtedly will get attacked for being a racist, while ignoring the facts of the situation. Just remember I could have included folks like Mayor Pete, Admiral Rachel, the luggage stealing weirdo, etc, but time prevents that. Gotta run....
Okay. Good.JD Vance is awkward as is, put him up against a dude who’s just genuinely good people and, oh boy! Wowzas! It’s such a short clip but says so much.
Login to view embedded media
What does the pic show?Neat video, literally means nothing.
JD Vance is awkward as is, put him up against a dude who’s just genuinely good people and, oh boy! Wowzas! It’s such a short clip but says so much.
Login to view embedded media
Listening to RFK is basically the same thing as listening to Patrick Mahomes Brother. Dude is a never has been attention whore, who gives a flying F what that asshat has to say. He should be endorsing Trump he’s a perfect addition to his team.
In a Presidential race that will likely come down to the margins, a marginal RFK, Jr. could definitely matter. His support tailed off the last month with all the strange $*** coming out about a past sexual assault, chemicals in water, and the dead bear incident.Listening to RFK is basically the same thing as listening to Patrick Mahomes Brother. Dude is a never has been attention whore, who gives a flying F what that asshat has to say. He should be endorsing Trump he’s a perfect addition to his team.
Listening to RFK is basically the same thing as listening to Patrick Mahomes Brother. Dude is a never has been attention whore, who gives a flying F what that asshat has to say. He should be endorsing Trump he’s a perfect addition to his team.It'd be cool to compare that to Kamala, but she doesn't give interviews.
On another note. RFKs speech today was really good, you'd think the left would listen to it and consider what RFK is saying but that's not what NBC told them to do so they won't.
Sad!
MehhI mean he’s a pretty big dude for a kicker, let’s be honest.
Coug flag right side up…ESPN flag upside down on the same pole? 🤷Fly the flag upside down. A historic signal of distress.
FDA would seem like a better fit. Maybe CDC.Director of the CIA would be most entertaining.
Director of the CIA would be most entertaining.What position are we talking about? Disguise artist? Passport handler? Parole officer?