Time for bed sir........you used to be fun to banter with, but now your just a pathetic, sour old man.
Too bad
The topic was your offense. I commented that we don’t know much because of the opposition. Sorry that seemed “sour”.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Time for bed sir........you used to be fun to banter with, but now your just a pathetic, sour old man.
Too bad
Auburn and BYU this year.
Fresno State and a road game at Rutgers last year.
Both are tougher than your OOC schedule this year.
To be fair I believe it was a comparison to our schedule and not necessarily saying Rutgers was a difficult game.Asked this before and got crickets.
What do Husky fans consider Petersen's signature win (s) at Washington. I know the dominance of WSU yaddy yaddy, but what is there outside of that ? 1-3 Bowl record. I guess Colorado a couple of years back. But that turned out to be a very bad Colorado team which lost their bowl game by over 30 pts.
Also you are the only program that would bring up Rutgers in any form or fashion as a difficult game. Woeful Kansas beat Rutger 55-14 this past week.
Rutgers was actually somewhat competitive 4-5 years ago--not sure about how good they were when ewe-dub played them, though.Asked this before and got crickets.
What do Husky fans consider Petersen's signature win (s) at Washington. I know the dominance of WSU yaddy yaddy, but what is there outside of that ? 1-3 Bowl record. I guess Colorado a couple of years back. But that turned out to be a very bad Colorado team which lost their bowl game by over 30 pts.
Also you are the only program that would bring up Rutgers in any form or fashion as a difficult game. Woeful Kansas beat Rutger 55-14 this past week.
Exactly.To be fair I believe it was a comparison to our schedule and not necessarily saying Rutgers was a difficult game.
Can't say I like 'SC, but I think they're the only ones that can claim to play a legit non-con schedule over the last several years--Alabama, Notre Dame, Texas, etc.--they've definitely made it a lot harder on themselves compared to the cupcake schedulers like bammy and ewe-dub.To be fair I believe it was a comparison to our schedule and not necessarily saying Rutgers was a difficult game.
Can't say I like 'SC, but I think they're the only ones that can claim to play a legit non-con schedule over the last several years--Alabama, Notre Dame, Texas, etc.--they've definitely made it a lot harder on themselves compared to the cupcake schedulers like bammy and ewe-dub.
The topic was your offense. The observation was that you’ve played two lousy Mountain West teams, so who knows?Asked this before and got crickets.
What do Husky fans consider Petersen's signature win (s) at Washington. I know the dominance of WSU yaddy yaddy, but what is there outside of that ? 1-3 Bowl record. I guess Colorado a couple of years back. But that turned out to be a very bad Colorado team which lost their bowl game by over 30 pts.
Also you are the only program that would bring up Rutgers in any form or fashion as a difficult game. Woeful Kansas beat Rutger 55-14 this past week.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that USC is the only 1-A team to have never played a 1-AA team.
The topic was your offense. The observation was that you’ve played two lousy Mountain West teams, so who knows?
Defensive much?
Hey........he changed the topic......answer the question
Why do you come here? I realize that the Rivals uw site is basically non-existent, but really.
I used to enjoy your occasional visits, mutt, but your never-ending BS in a recent thread soured me. Please go away and don't come back.
He was too much of a gunslinger.Halliday with this upgraded talent around him would be ridiculous every game.
UW 44 - Stanford 6
That same Stanford team that WSU beat 42-16 at their stadium the following week.
Just to return to the subject.
The subject was your offense. That SAT must’ve been a bitch for some of you.If you really were concerned with staying on the subject, you'd be spending your time on one of the Hussie forums.
BTW, I'm surprised you haven't started doing Friday prediction threads...
The subject was your offense. That SAT must’ve been a bitch for some of you.
I didn't say anything disparaging about WSU. It was not me who eliminated WSU from the marquee win category. It was you and yours. That said, Stanford had a better 2016 season than WSU.I guess it is complex for you . However I always find it strange that any Huskie fan would ever say anything disparaging about WSU as UW's wins in those games are by far and away the best ones on Pete's resume at the school. It was not tangential discussion but to make a point that the Huskies should do everything they can to pump WSU up , because this season like the last 3, a win in that game will likely be your "marquee " win again before you venture somewhere to get pounded in another bowl game.
That is only while the "official" 1-AA and FCS designations have existed (last 40 plus years).Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that USC is the only 1-A team to have never played a 1-AA team.