ADVERTISEMENT

When is the Pac-12 going to announce media deal and expansion?

Fantasize much? None of them are coming. Everyone is laughing at Teresa and the hapless Pac-X.

Have I said "I told you so" lately? :)
Only every single frikken day. Right there at the bottom of each message.

But don't worry, the announcement is imminent! They will be announcing the new league members at halftime on Saturday, in front of the sold out stadium crowd. There will be AD's, players, and cheerleaders from each of the new PAC members. I am already getting a thrill running up my leg!

ICE, Greenland, etc. - this is getting so bad

Who can/would build one of those plants in a day, to take advantage of yesterday’s tariff rates? Which will go poof the next day, based on whether it’s pump week, or dump week?
Depends on the industry. Revisit in two years and see who has come back to this hemisphere for manufacturing.

There’s also lots of foreign countries licking their chops to take manufacturing away from the Chinese. By participating in reciprocal tariff agreements, they can likely secure defense agreements from the US by playing ball.

Cam Ward projected #1 to Titans...

John Schneider's track record on offensive line has been terrible. If the Seahawks don't make it to the playoffs, and maybe past the opening round, I think Schneider's time in Seattle has come to an end.

I think Pete Carroll was the main guy finding the talent and making it work . Pete wanted the right personalities to fit his culture. I just don't see the same "magic" coming from John.
Maybe he can find some marginal DLs and switch them over!

Sac State to the Pac....

Oh c'mon. Don't lower yourself to the level of the trolls here. And, silly Coug, why would you think anyone (besides the Always-razor focused Loyal One) want to talk about Cougar Athletics?

I did see where the Baseball team had 2,400-plus fans for the recent series-clinching SJSU game. Must have been Mom's weekend? Oh, I mean "parents" weekend. Gotta stay woke.
Won't someone think of the parents? How dare you not be inclusive to moms/ dads on dads/moms weekend?

This is one of the things that irks me the most. Change for the sake of change. How many fcking people were writing letters about moms/ dads weekend not being inclusive? Oh that's right... the wrong sex parent was being escorted off of campus in handcuffs, remember all those stories of that happening? Yeah... me either.

When is the Pac-12 going to announce media deal and expansion?

I hope we hear UNLV, Tulane and Memphis are coming. Best markets and best brands.
The silence surrounding the conference situation is deafening.

If I give Gould the benefit of the doubt and assume she understands the gravity of the situation and getting the league shored up ASAFP, then the reality is that we simple aren't very attractive to teams who might come to the PAC - which would be possible the worst possibility.

If I assume she's a dumbass and doesn't realize the gravity of the situation, then either she can't or won't offer teams enough to switch conferences, which isn't much better but at least can be remedied.

Neither situation is great, which is why the leagues future is dire.

Sac State to the Pac....

I have absolutely nothing new or useful to add. Just wanted to move this thread to the top of the list and see how many views I could suck in....

;) :rolleyes:
Oh c'mon. Don't lower yourself to the level of the trolls here. And, silly Coug, why would you think anyone (besides the Always-razor focused Loyal One) want to talk about Cougar Athletics?

I did see where the Baseball team had 2,400-plus fans for the recent series-clinching SJSU game. Must have been Mom's weekend? Oh, I mean "parents" weekend. Gotta stay woke.
  • Like
Reactions: cr8zyncalif

ICE, Greenland, etc. - this is getting so bad

It's the type of manufacturing done overseas - chips (aside from Micron), pharmaceuticals, munitions, etc.

There's still US manufacturing of some products but as Chamath said, it's the risk of not bringing manufacturing onshore that is the real issue.
Who can/would build one of those plants in a day, to take advantage of yesterday’s tariff rates? Which will go poof the next day, based on whether it’s pump week, or dump week?

ICE, Greenland, etc. - this is getting so bad

How much of the job losses are due to automation? We still seem to have pretty good manufacturing capacity, per FRED.
It's the type of manufacturing done overseas - chips (aside from Micron), pharmaceuticals, munitions, etc.

There's still US manufacturing of some products but as Chamath said, it's the risk of not bringing manufacturing onshore that is the real issue.

Cam Ward projected #1 to Titans...

Here's another point on NFL QBs. Salary vs. production (wins).


Top QBs are valued over $50M a year, taking up nearly 20% of salary cap.

If you can get some good production out of a young guy - see Jayden Daniels at $9.4M - now you have money to spend on talent around the QB.
  • Like
Reactions: Coug90

Cam Ward projected #1 to Titans...

I suppose the logic is that its all a crap shoot and you're just as likely to get a solid qb at 1 as you are in the 5th round, perhaps even a little better chance.

Gotta go do some work, but maybe later I'll go do the research to see if there is a correlation between qb success and draft selection order.
***** couldn't help myself, check this out:
Login to view embedded media

Also, look towards the bottom and you'll find this gem:
"Tom Brady, Gardner Minshew, Dak Prescott, Kirk Cousins, Russell Wilson, Nick Foles, Jimmy Garoppolo, and Drew Brees are the only quarterbacks drafted outside of the first round in twenty years to have a completion percentage of 60%, a TD:INT ratio over 2.00, and an ANY/A rating over 6.00." That's pretty good company Minshew is mentioned with.
That's a good analysis, but I have two questions/comments:

  • It shows that QBs picked in the top 5 are better than those picked 6-32...but the difference isn't that big. Those top 5 QBs have a lot more starts, but none of their performance measures - win percentage, completion percentage, passer rating - are markedly higher than those picked later in the round. And, their TD:INT ration is lower than those picked in the bottom half (a stat that might be influenced by Aaron Rogers alone).
  • My second comment follows directly from the first...QBs from the top 5 picks have almost 2x as many starts and more seasons rostered than the later picks. So how much of their modestly better performance is because teams are more reluctant to give up on a top 5 pick? (It would also be fair to ask how much their performance is impeded because teams are too eager to put them on the field before they're ready.)

I can't necessarily vouch for the completeness of this list, but here are the QBs drafted in the top 5 since 2000. There are 33. The jury may still be out on 11 of them (Mayfield through Richardson), the rest of them I think we know who they are. Of that 22...it looks to me that for a large percentage, it could be argued they weren't worth the top 5...and that someone taken later would have been a better choice. I think 8 of the 22 would be considered outright busts by a majority.



Michael Vick
David Carr
Joey Harrington
Carson Palmer
Eli Manning
Philip Rivers
Alex Smith
Vince Young
jamarcus russell
Matt Ryan
Matthew Stafford
Mark Sanchez
Sam Bradford
Cam Newton
Andrew Luck
Robert Griffin III
Blake Bortles
Jameis Winston
Marcus Mariota
Jared Goff
Carson Wentz
Mitchell Trubisky
Baker Mayfield
Sam Darnold
Kyler Murray
Joe Burrow
Tua Tagovailoa
Trevor Lawrence
Zach Wilson
Trey Lance
Bryce Young
CJ Stroud
Anthony Richardson

Cam Ward projected #1 to Titans...

Corellary:
John Schneider has spent the last month rationalizing why he doesn't need draft or acquire OL. He acknowledges the need, refuses to do it.

Hopefully Lucas can stay healthy and make a difference this year and they find 2 more guys that can earn their paycheck.
John Schneider's track record on offensive line has been terrible. If the Seahawks don't make it to the playoffs, and maybe past the opening round, I think Schneider's time in Seattle has come to an end.

I think Pete Carroll was the main guy finding the talent and making it work . Pete wanted the right personalities to fit his culture. I just don't see the same "magic" coming from John.
  • Like
Reactions: Coug90

Cam Ward projected #1 to Titans...

Yeah, logic tends to get lost behind the irrational exuberance. People get sucked in by the highlight films and don’t notice that they’re outnumbered by the head-scratching and face-palming ones.
I suppose the logic is that its all a crap shoot and you're just as likely to get a solid qb at 1 as you are in the 5th round, perhaps even a little better chance.

Gotta go do some work, but maybe later I'll go do the research to see if there is a correlation between qb success and draft selection order.
***** couldn't help myself, check this out:
Login to view embedded media

Also, look towards the bottom and you'll find this gem:
"Tom Brady, Gardner Minshew, Dak Prescott, Kirk Cousins, Russell Wilson, Nick Foles, Jimmy Garoppolo, and Drew Brees are the only quarterbacks drafted outside of the first round in twenty years to have a completion percentage of 60%, a TD:INT ratio over 2.00, and an ANY/A rating over 6.00." That's pretty good company Minshew is mentioned with.

Cam Ward projected #1 to Titans...

No doubt the number of #1 qb draft picks who have busted is larger than those who have even just had a winning record, but you can't convince anyone in the NFL to not gamble on the next great thing, in spite of the facts.
Yeah, logic tends to get lost behind the irrational exuberance. People get sucked in by the highlight films and don’t notice that they’re outnumbered by the head-scratching and face-palming ones.

Cam Ward projected #1 to Titans...

Tell that to the teams who drafted Trey Lance, will Levis, Jamarcus Russell, and Ryan Leaf. Their perspective is probably different.
No doubt the number of #1 qb draft picks who have busted is larger than those who have even just had a winning record, but you can't convince anyone in the NFL to not gamble on the next great thing, in spite of the facts.
  • Like
Reactions: cr8zyncalif

ICE, Greenland, etc. - this is getting so bad

I'm not a violent criminal. Is that what you are saying? What a stupid post.

And I post 3 links containing damning info, and the Trumpers immediately pivot to Panama? Nice comebacks.

On the flip side, my retirement accounts are healing well today. :) After the Orange One (is he orange-er than usual or is it just me?) pauses all his tariffs. So how the F is anyone, US or our trading "partners", supposed to operate with this on again off again circus? I mean really. Were the cargo boats docking yesterday from overseas subject to tariffs, but today they are good to go?

I have no idea what the mechanisms are for collecting tariffs, but Christ what an accounting nightmare. Absolute insanity.
Login to view embedded media
It’s not a tumor…er, trade war

It’s about repatriating manufacturing and, to some degree, redistributing wealth.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT