Is to build schedules for our sport programs for the next two years, effectively as an independent. By then, the MWC conference schools will be out of their bad TV deal, binding them to the that conference and they will be effectively free agents. The 8-10 million we would make over that period by simply joining the MWC just isn't worth it. Our 100 year history and the record book associated with it, has value. Further, doesn't WSU and OSU owe it those teams and athletes who won them conference championships, to make a good faith effort to protect their legacy. Joining the MWC for effectively chump change and ease of scheduling reasons? I'm sorry, but hell no! We'd be just like the others, but for a whole lot less money. Also, let's not forget, much of that 8-10 million will be offset with appearance fees and our own independent grants of rights during the interim.
In two years--which and how many schools do you invite to join? My thought is 6 - AF, SDSU, Boise, CSU, Fresno, and UNLV. Why only 6, not 8 including WYO and USU? It is because we no longer have the luxury of "cup cake" scheduling. We as the New Pac conference need to schedule multiple games against Power 4 schools, taking the annual "who have they played" denigration and diminishment off the table. It will also increases revenues significantly. Ultimately, as new conference, in effect, we will want power conference recognition, and the only way you get that is beating power conference teams. All we need is one team a year that is hitting on all cylinders, and that message is sent.
Who should be the commissioner? George or Larry? Just kidding. I'd favor either Luck or Nevarez, both having legal backgrounds. The last thing we need is yet another pitch man making promises and selling snake oil. We need someone trained to manage and assess situations on the risk/benefit continuum, you know, someone who can actually provide sound business and legal advice moving forward.
Thoughts....