Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
F'n clown show.
But hey, Rolo wears cool hats.
F'n clown show.
But hey, Rolo wears cool hats.
What’s up with the continual digs at Rolovich?
Things are much worse in Pullman than we have seen. Might be a rough week or two as a handful of players we we're leaning on for support next year appear headed out the door.
Excited to hear the spin on how we didn't want Calvin anyway.
It does happen with a new coaching staff. It happened with our previous coach, and the coach before him. It could be a problem if there are other issues we don't know about. But, unless we find out otherwise, I will chalk this up to normal turnover.All I see are some players recruited by a previous staff that don’t mesh with the new staff. It happens. No clue what you expect Rolovich to do. Kiss their ass? If they don’t buy in with the new staff Wazzu isn’t good for them and they need to find a new spot. Doesn’t mean they won’t be missed but program doesn’t need a locker room like that.
It does happen with a new coaching staff. It happened with our previous coach, and the coach before him. It could be a problem if there are other issues we don't know about. But, unless we find out otherwise, I will chalk this up to normal turnover.
WSU lost a consensus "national" coach and replaced him with a regional guy. WSU football feels more JV now. Whether that's a fair assessment or not, it's the truth, and now the perception of the program.
I'm not here to debate whether you felt like Leach mailed it in the past couple of seasons, but the perception with him at the helm was a ton more national and conference respect. As soon as he bolted the Cougars went back to the "little ol WSU" program.
UW and WSU now have "regional" coaches again. OSU continues to have that vibe as well. Oregon is the only PNW university that has a "national" coach. Whether again you believe it or not, (or think he isn't an elite coach) it's the perception. It's not Rolovich's fault, it's just how it is, and deep down I think this has something to do with the portal, etc.
Weren’t there also some comments to the same about Leach leaving? Let’s remember things were not so rosey in his last year either.Not sure a ton of the details will ever come to light but I've heard a ton of not happy rumblings in the past year or so. All the news in the past several weeks fit these rumblings. I was surprised when we had so few players transfer out by the semester break and thought concerns I had heard were overblown. Now things seems to be flaring up again and kids are voting with their feet.
It was a huge step back in branding. Rolo is not established at all. WSU is trying to catch a rising star at its beginning. In his defense, he has signed 2 classes and coached 4 games. It’s a terrible way to start. He hasn't had much of a chance to show what he can do. That isn’t his fault. In WSU’s defense, there are only so many established coaches around. Not everyone is gonna get one. And if you don’t have big time facilities or aren't willing to spend the money, why would those guys choose your school?
If WSU wants respect they have to go out and take it. They have to win. Then win more. Then blow people out. Then win more. Then maybe. The respect WSU gets is commensurate with the investment the school has made in football over the past 100 years.
I agree - some of this Rolo couldn't control and it's just bad timing. Hoping what he can control is the day-to-day since he's been on the job. There's been pros and cons across spectrums.
I was happy to see WSU open the pocket book for a coach, $3M is a very good salary, it just felt like that was an overpay to get in on an up-and-comer like Rolo, so would've $3.5M-$4M gotten a more established coach? Maybe they tried.
Like you said, WSU didn't invest in football for far too long. It's apparently and Chun's biggest hurdle for the program is the branding perception. Winning football games is No. 1, obviously, but branding should be No. 1B.
Weren’t there also some comments to the same about Leach leaving? Let’s remember things were not so rosey in his last year either.
There’s 100 guys on the team, many of which have options that weren’t available 5 years ago, almost all of which have been told they’re the greatest thing ever since they were in pee wees.
I don’t like hearing this stuff either but I’d say all things considered with our NFL prospects returning along with the majority of quality players who are 6th year guys, things are gonna be ok.
JDL was already looking shaky, but he was a known quantity. Losing Calvin is bad. Not good signs but also too early to say anything definitively.
Don't forget that the Leach era started off with Marquess Wilson and others leaving - and it still preceded the greatest era of WSU football ever.
If WSU isn't going to commit to having a brand itself, it would behoove them to hire a coach that has an already established brand. They chose neither. They are striking out to develop both.
Price had 2x consecutive 10-winners, not 3x. Doba was coach for 2003. Remember? Other thoughts:We had 3 10 win seasons in a row during that period?
And 2 Rose bowls as well?
Interesting.
Price had 2x consecutive 10-winners, not 3x. Doba was coach for 2003. Remember? Other thoughts:
CML was phoning it in at the end and probably will for the rest of time, so it was time for him to go. But that doesn't stop me being grateful for an historic ride.
- CML has a better W/L record than Price despite playing with a 2-year-handicap rebuilding after the worst coach in program history. If he took over for a mediocre coach like Price did, he'd have cleared 0.600 easy.
- Head to head, CML has the best 1-year stretch (11 wins), is tied for best 2-year stretch (20 wins), has the best 3-year stretch (28), best 4-year (37), best 5-year (43), best 6-year (46), best 7-year (52) and best 8-year (55). Most aren't close: in fact, CML's best record in any given stretch of years is 20% (!) better than CMP's.
- CML took us to as many bowls as CMP in about half the time. Some of that can be explained by growing bowl invite lists, but not enough to explain Leach's 2x success rate.
- Rose Bowls are great; less so when you lose both, and get smoked in the 2nd one.
- It's a real downer to think about what would have been with Cracraft & Marquess Wilson had they not been all or mostly wasted in that transition
I appreciate your response as I was kinda being a dick in my post. Sorry about that.
I would argue that while Leach had to deal with Paul Wulff's crap sandwhich he was handed....he had the facilities, name recognition, and Pac 12 money to get back on track.
Yes, Doba coached the 2003 team, but Price built it...so he gets a lot of credit there.
Leach only cracked 10 wins once and had an extra game to do so. Price had was able to do so 3 times and gets a good deal of credit for that despite facilities that were still in the Paleolithic era.
And as much as I liked that 2018 team, I don't think they could have beaten any of those 10 win teams.
Also, I think the Rosebowl would have been a lot closer had Price not decided to leave...or let Doba coach. That was a recipe for disaster.
Price had 2x consecutive 10-winners, not 3x. Doba was coach for 2003. Remember? Other thoughts:
CML was phoning it in at the end and probably will for the rest of time, so it was time for him to go. But that doesn't stop me being grateful for an historic ride.
- CML has a better W/L record than Price despite playing with a 2-year-handicap rebuilding after the worst coach in program history. If he took over for a mediocre coach like Price did, he'd have cleared 0.600 easy.
- Head to head, CML has the best 1-year stretch (11 wins), is tied for best 2-year stretch (20 wins), has the best 3-year stretch (28), best 4-year (37), best 5-year (43), best 6-year (46), best 7-year (52) and best 8-year (55). Most aren't close: in fact, CML's best record in any given stretch of years is 20% (!) better than CMP's.
- CML took us to as many bowls as CMP in about half the time. Some of that can be explained by growing bowl invite lists, but not enough to explain Leach's 2x success rate.
- Rose Bowls are great; less so when you lose both, and get smoked in the 2nd one.
- It's a real downer to think about what would have been with Cracraft & Marquess Wilson had they not been all or mostly wasted in that transition
Great post, and even then, I'm not convinced Leach was phoning it in. I think he possibly had a bit of a dip in commitment, going from the affect of a fast food worker (even during the good times, like 2018) to a DMV employee (in 2019), but the main issue was having his whole staff poached. I can't think of a single coach in a lower-tier Power 5 situation who ever has been able to navigate having his key assistants poached repeatedly and being asked to replace them on a budget constantly. Someone like Saban can do it because it's Bama, he's Saban, and because they can pay ridiculous amounts to bring in ex-NFL head coaches to be assistants supported by ex-college head coaches and other stars serving as analysts and shit like that.
The win total is really an apples to oranges comparison. Price didn't have the facilities and probably had to paint his own office.
He came in as a nobody from Weber State and didn't have the name or facilities Leach had...yet he reached greater heights.
Nobody?The win total is really an apples to oranges comparison. Price didn't have the facilities and probably had to paint his own office.
He came in as a nobody from Weber State and didn't have the name or facilities Leach had...yet he reached greater heights.
Sponge hates Leach & had zero faith from the Jump in Provo.
(Documented here of all places)
He’s pushed all his chips into the Rolo Era.
(Documented here again of all places)
Cougatron has it all on record.
I’m already enjoying the show.