No Wulffui, Michael Black is someone who had a checkered past. Somethinhg you are clearly naïve to . At this point it has nothing to do with "wulff was good enough", it is about your non sense and complaints about the same crap every coach has dealt with. You simply want to think Wulff is the only coach with a kid gone "bad".
1. I don't know what HS you went to where a kid goes from a 12 year old in Juvi to a HS senior in four years- is this more "3/4 isn't 75%" math? Obviously, he wasn't 12.
I sense this will be like your "I bet you can't even tell the difference between Leach quotes and Wulff quotes" proposition.
Not at all. But you made a vociferous defense- "how could Wulff have known he could be trouble? SHOW ME ANYTHING!?"
You tell me how old he was. 13? The article was written before his senior year. I was 17 going into my senior year. So my apologies. He was 13. Now that changes everything.
I know, since growing it is now legal.
Not 12. Probably not 13, either- the kinds of kids who commit robbery in their early teens don't necessarily expedite their classroom experience at a standard pace.
You've never backed up any of the goofy assertions you made before- why start now?
I said show me something. Because you made the claim he should have known. You didn't provide the article, Fab did. You simply said he had a grow operation and he was a bad guy. I asked you ten times where do you get that from.
Which goofy assertions are you referring to. Chris Ball to DC? Do you really want me to prove it to you? What will that mean to you?
Maybe I am missing a post, which is very likely with this new system. But I have gone back and I didn't see it where he remotely mentioned he was on a recruiting visit? No where did he say he was with potential recruits. Please show me where you see that?
"I didn't lead with anything. I mostly just shook hands, smiled, listened, allowed kids to ask all the questions and then thanked them for their time, took a tour of facilities, watched a practice and left. They were impressed meeting an NFL draft prospect(at the time), though as well as the trophies. Kids seem to like trophies."
Really, especially the part that says "kids". You know my "kids" took a tour of the facility, they asked questions and they watched a practice. I have two girls. Didn't seem like "recruiting" visit to me.
By what you wrote, no. And I asked four times at least what happened at Bellevue High and you couldn't answer. And are you still saying Barrington had problems at his high school?
Got it...if you do something on the field its ok. Check.
I've never, in my life, described my children in a discussion as "kids"- solely kids- the kids, my kids... Yes. But when I say "kids"... I'm usually talking about OTHER PEOPLE'S KIDS. Seriously, when you go shopping, do you tell your wife, "I'm taking kids shopping", ever?
One out of two- and they both wound up bad. Given that a documented history on Atofau was met with a shrug by Wulff, how do you know he didn't just blow through red flags with Barrington like he clearly did with JA?
I was right, you were wrong. Someone else verified that.
I thought you said you are a student at WSU? Why is it ridiculous? I say it all the time. "I picked up the kids". I dropped the kids off. What time are the girls or kids coming home. Interesting take however.
You don't think Leach takes that kid? Really? Tell me what you know about Rashard Hunt? How about Julius Howard? Tell me who said the following? "we wait until a guy's guilty" when asked if any discipline will be taken. "But if we're certain somebody's guilty, we may act sooner".
Yes, you say, "THE kids", never just "kids"- you just did in all these sentences, at least, which is the point I'm making, with regards to how you discuss your children.
Your right, my kids didn't ask about the transfer discussion. If there was a kid from say Maryland, and transferred out to WSU, my kids could have easily said "I watched you play at University of Md, how did you get to WSU? Or I remember you at WSU, how did you get to Eastern? I mean there is a lot of ways to get that in a simple discussion without assuming some nefarious act took place.
Jesus, again, you have no idea. Instead of asking you assume there was something that he said. How do you know it wasn't a simple typo? How do you know the kids weren't 5th graders? How do you know Chinook isn't a PE teacher letting his kids go see Eastern because his best friend is Beau BAldwin.
Just let it go. You weren't involved to begin with, so you don't need to gin up weird hypotheticals for someone else.
Solid suggestion, couple that with an early signing period and good evaluators work will pay off. Offer early, if they accept get them signed up. If they don't sign, then you know exactly where they stand. If you want to really get radical, make the NFL start paying for the development of these players. Force the issue and have the NFL start a true minor league system. That will take some of the top flight kids out of the equation, but the kids that are in school will be there for a reason.
I wasn't involved, that is why I am providing you with alternatives for when you "gin up" the conversation that you assumed took place.
Thank goodness you're here to ignore what is said so you can make stuff up.
Shopping for flowers.
