My buddy sent this to me last night. It was posted on Die Hard Cougs Facebook page/board/forum/group/cult, whatever they call it. I don't do FB so don't know the proper term to use. I do recall that this outfit has been badmouthed by some folks here, but I am going to post it anyway just to get the good content. Let's see if our attorneys here agree with this interpretation.....
Read this from the Die Hard COUGS block I follow:
Like a lot of us, after the WA SC decision yesterday, I found myself hoisting a pint. But then, since I’m not an attorney, I decided to ask my favorite one (AKA Wifey) about what she thought. For those of you who are attorneys, she’s been in private practice for 20+ years and is 2-0 in the appellate court. The only thing wrong with her is her taste in husbands….
In her opinion:
1. The decision by the SC to not do a discretionary review was DEVASTATING to the plaintiffs (AKA the Mutts). She spelled it out to me in legal terms; I’ll put it in layman’s terms: it’s a GIANT F$CK YOU. And GO AWAY, DON’T BOTHER ME WITH THIS AGAIN.
2. So me, as a layman, asked “What’s their recourse?”. Again, she gave me more legal terms, so I will translate to the layman: Ain’t one.
3. I said that this could possibly drag out for years, unless there was a negotiated settlement. She agreed, and then added something which didn’t require translation: “Your beloved COUGS and the Beavers hold all of the cards. They can wait for the other schools to come begging.”
There is so much to be fretful for over in the future of our COUGS (conference realignment, NIL, portal, etc). But for now, as a buddy of mine said today, “WSU and OSU are the richest and prettiest girls in town”. Let us take a deep breath and hoist yet again.
GO COUGS! FOREVER!!!!!!!